Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 11:1 (2016) ► pp.94114
References
Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M
(2001) What preschool children do and do not do with ungrammatical word orders. Cognitive Development, 161, 679–692. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Graded representations in the acquisition of English and German transitive constructions. Cognitive Development, 231, 48–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abbot-Smith, K., & Tomasello, M
(2010) The influence of frequency and semantic similarity on how children learn grammar. First Language, 301, 79–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brisard, F., Laarman, E., & Nicoladis, E
(2008) Clausal order and the acquisition of Dutch deverbal compounds. Morphology, 181, 143–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V.
(1981) Lexical innovations: How children learn to create new words. In W. Deustch (Ed.), The child’s construction of language (pp. 299–328). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E
(1993) The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V., & Barron, B.J.S
(1988) A thrower button or a button thrower? Children’s judgments of grammatical and ungrammatical compound nouns. Linguistics, 261, 3–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V., Gelman, S.A., & Lane, N.M.
(1985) Compound nouns and category structure in young children. Child Development, 561, 84–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.V., Hecht, B.F., & Mulford, R.C.
(1986) Coining complex compounds in English: Affixes and word order in acquisition. Linguistics, 241, 7–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M.
(1997) Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. Google Scholar
Gamache, J., & Schmitt, C
(2014) Compounds, learning mechanisms, and the continuity hypothesis in language acquisition. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 201, 110–118.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E.
(2003) Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. TRENDS in Cognitive Science, 71, 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E., Casenhiser, D.M., & Sethuraman, N
(2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 151, 289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M
(2003) Early syntactic creativity: A usage- based approach. Journal of Child Language, 301, 333–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M
(2005) The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 201, 121–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, V.A., & Nicoladis, E
(2006) When answer-phone makes a difference in children’s acquisition of English compounds. Journal of Child Language, 331, 677–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagpal, J., & Nicoladis, E
Nicoladis, E
(2003) Cross-linguistic transfer in deverbal compounds of preschool bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 61, 17–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Preschool children’s acquisition of compounds. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 96–124). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E., & Yin, H
(2002) The role of frequency in acquisition of English and Chinese compounds by bilingual children. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish, & A.H.J. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E.O.
(1982) The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M
(1992) First verbs. A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000a) Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 741, 209–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000b) First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 111, 61–82.Google Scholar
(2003) Constructing a language: A Usage-Based Theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar