Current theoretical approaches to inflectional morphology make extensive use of the two concepts of abstract feature decomposition and underspecification. Psycholinguistic models of inflection, in contrast, generally lack such more differentiated morphological analyses. This paper reports a series of behavioral experiments that investigate the processing of grammatical gender of nouns in German. The results of these experiments support the idea that elements in the mental lexicon may be underspecified with regard to their grammatical features. However, contrary to all established morphological and psycholinguistic approaches, we provide evidence that even the lexical representation of bare noun stems is characterized by underspecified gender information. The observation that the domain of underspecification of grammatical features extends from inflectional markers to noun stems, supports the idea that underspecification is a more general characteristic of the mental lexicon. We conclude that this finding is mainly driven by economical reasons: a feature (or feature value) that is never used for grammatical operations (e.g., inflectional marking or evaluation of agreement) is not needed in the language system at all.
Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 101, 425–455.
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 281, 297–332.
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S., Hadler, M., & Sonnenstuhl, I. (2001). The mental representation of inflected words: An experimental study of adjectives and verbs in German. Language, 771, 510–543.
Corbett, G., & Fraser, N. (1993). Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics, 291, 113–142.
De Martino, M., Bracco, G., & Laudanna, A. (2011). The activation of grammatical gender information in processing Italian nouns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 261, 745–776.
Friederici, A.D., & Jacobson, Th. (1999). Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 281, 467–484.
Frisson, St., & Pickering, M.J. (1999). The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 1366–1383.
Grimshaw, J. (2001). Optimal clitic positions and the lexicon in romance clitic systems. In G. Legendre, J. Grimshaw, & S. Vikner (Eds.), Optimal theoretic syntax (pp. 205–240). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Vol. 24 of current studies in linguistics (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1994). Some key features of distributed morphology. In H.H. Andrew Carnie & T. Bures (Eds.), MITWPL: Papers on Phonology and Morphology, Vol. 211 (pp. 275–288). Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL.
Holmes, V.M., & Segui, J. (2004). Sublexical and lexical influences on gender assignment in French. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 331, 425–457.
Janssen, U., & Penke, M. (2002). How are inflectional affixes organized in the mental lexicon? Evidence from the investigation of agreement errors in agrammatic aphasics. Brain and Language, 811, 180–191.
Köpcke, K.-M. (1982). Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Krifka, M. (2009). Case syncretism in German feminines: Typological, functional and structural aspects. In P. Steinkrüger & M. Krifka (Eds.), On inflection (pp. 141–172). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2002). Underspecified recognition. Labphon, 71, 637–676.
Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2010). Distinctive features: phonological under-specification in representation and processing. Journal of Phonetics, 381, 44–59.
Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 1–75.
Lukatela, G., Gligorijević, B., Kostić, A., & Turvey, M.T. (1980). Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory and Cognition, 81, 415–423.
Meunier, F., Seigneuric, A., & Spinelli, E. (2008). The morpheme gender effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 581, 88–99.
Opitz, A., Regel, St., Müller, G., & Friederici, A.D. (2013). Neurophysiological evidence for morphological underspecification in German strong adjective inflection. Language, 891, 231–264.
Penke, M. (2006). Flexion im mentalen Lexikon. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Penke, M., Janssen, U., & Eisenbeiss, S. (2004). Psycholinguistic evidence for the underspecification of morphosyntactic features. Brain and Language, 901, 423–433.
Pickering, M.J., & Frisson, St. (2001). Processing ambiguous verbs: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 271, 556–573.
Rumelhart, D.E., & McClelland, J.L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 891, 60–94.
Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 191, 841–850.
Schiller, N.O., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 481, 169–194.
Seidenberg, M.S., & Gonnerman, L.M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 41, 353–361.
Stump, G. (2001). Inflectional Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trommer, J. (2006). Person and number agreement in Dumi. Linguistics, 441, 1011–1057.
Wegera, Kl.-P. (1997). Das Genus: Ein Beitrag zur Didaktik des DaF-Unterrichts. Munich: Iudicum-Verlag.
Wunderlich, D. (1996). Minimalist morphology: The role of paradigms. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995 (pp. 93–114). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Klassen, Rachel, Björn Lundquist & Marit Westergaard
2023. L1 Grammatical Gender Variation through the Representation in the Lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:2 ► pp. 359 ff.
Seyboth, Margret & Frank Domahs
2023. Why do He and She Disagree: The Role of Binary Morphological Features in Grammatical Gender Agreement in German. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:3 ► pp. 923 ff.
2022. Structural and phonological cues for gender assignment in monolingual and bilingual children acquiring German. Experiments with real and nonce words. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1
Pinta, Justin
2022. Gender Agreement in Correntino Spanish. Journal of Language Contact 14:3 ► pp. 609 ff.
Lohndal, Terje & Marit Westergaard
2021. Grammatical Gender: Acquisition, Attrition, and Change. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 95 ff.
Ruberg, Tobias
2021. Gender agreement in SLI: A study on production and inflection of articles in German. Language Acquisition 28:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
BORDAG, DENISA, AMIT KIRSCHENBAUM, MARIA ROGAHN, ANDREAS OPITZ & ERWIN TSCHIRNER
2019. Misbehaved masculines: Incidental acquisition of grammatical gender in L2 German during reading. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22:1 ► pp. 130 ff.
Kimball, Amelia E., Kailen Shantz, Christopher Eager & Joseph Roy
2019. Confronting Quasi-Separation in Logistic Mixed Effects for Linguistic Data: A Bayesian Approach. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 26:3 ► pp. 231 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.