Article published In:
Linguistic Perspectives on Morphological ProcessingEdited by Harald Clahsen, Vera Heyer and Jana Reifegerste
[The Mental Lexicon 11:2] 2016
► pp. 308–328
Edited by Harald Clahsen, Vera Heyer and Jana Reifegerste
[The Mental Lexicon 11:2] 2016
► pp. 308–328
The processing of morphologically complex words in a specific speaker group
A masked-priming study with Turkish heritage speakers
The present study investigates to what extent morphological priming varies across different groups of native speakers of a language. In two masked-priming experiments, we investigate the processing of morphologically complex Turkish words in Turkish heritage speakers raised and living in Germany. Materials and experimental design were based on Kırkıcı and Clahsen’s (2013) study on morphological processing in Turkish native speakers and L2 learners, allowing for direct comparisons between the three groups. Experiment 1 investigated priming effects for morphologically related prime-target pairs. Heritage speakers showed a similar pattern of results as the L1 comparison group, with significant priming effects for prime-target pairs with inflected primes (e.g. ‘sorar-sor’ asks-ask) as well as for prime-target pairs with derived primes (e.g. ‘sağlık-sağ’ health-healthy). In Experiment 2, we measured priming effects for prime-target pairs which were semantically and morphologically unrelated, but only related with regard to orthographic overlap (e.g. ‘devre-dev’ period-giant). Unlike both L1 speakers raised in Turkey and highly proficient L2 learners, heritage speakers also showed significant priming effects in this condition. Our results suggest that heritage speakers differ from both native speakers and L2 learners in that they rely more on (orthographic) surface form properties of the stimulus during early stages of word recognition, at the expense of morphological decomposition.
References (28)
Andrews, S., & Hersch, J. (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1391, 299–318. 
Andrews, S., Lo, S. (2012). Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: Individual differences in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 152–163.
Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2013). Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 279–296.
Barr, D., Levy, R. Scheepers, C., & Tily, H.J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 255–278.
Beyersmann, E., Casalis, S., Ziegler, J.C., & Grainger, J. (2015). Language proficiency and morpho-orthographic segmentation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 221, 1054‑1061.
Bolger, P.A., & Zapata, G.C. (2011). Psycholinguistic approaches to language processing in heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 81, 1–29.
Clahsen, H., & Neubauer, K. (2010). Morphology, frequency, and the processing of derived words in native and nonnative speakers. Lingua, 1201, 2627–2637.
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Sato, M. & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning 601: 21–43.
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J.A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 641, 344–358.
Feldman, L.B., Kostic, A., Basnight-Brown, D.M., Filipovic Durdevic, D., & Pastizzo, M.J. (2010). Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and nonnative speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 131, 119–135.
Gor, K., & Cook, S. (2010). Non-native processing of verbal morphology: In search of regularity. Language Learning, 60.11, 88–126.
Heyer, V., & Clahsen, H. (2015). Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner AND in scandal: Dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 181, 543–550.
Kırkıcı, B., & Clahsen, H. (2013). Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 161, 776–794.
Lavric, A., Elchlepp, H., & Rastle, K. (2012). Tracking hierarchical processing in morphological decomposition with brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 381, 811–816.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2007). Morphological processes in language comprehension. In G. Gaskel (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 231, 394–421.
Montrul, S. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 51, 39–68.
Montrul, S., & Bowles, M. (2009). Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of Differential Object Marking in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 121, 363–383.
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 581, 503–553.
Neubauer, K., & Clahsen, H. (2009). Decomposition of inflected words in a second language: An experimental study of German participles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 311, 403–435.
Rastle, K., Davis, M.D., Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Tyler, L.K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 151, 407–437.
Rastle, K., Davis, M.D., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morphoorthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 111, 1090–1098.
Rastle, K., & Davis, M.H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 231, 942–971.
Rothman, J. (2009). Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages, International Journal of Bilingualism, 131, 155–163.
Rothman, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2014). A prolegomenon to the construct of the native speaker: Heritage speaker bilinguals are natives too! Applied Linguistics, 351, 93–98.
Say, B., Zeyrek, D., Oflazer, K., & Özge, U. (2002). Development of a corpus and a Treebank for present-day written Turkish. In K. İmer & G. Doğan (Eds.), Current research in Turkish linguistics. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. Northern Cyprus: Eastern Mediterranean University.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime User’s Guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
Silva, R. & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 111: 245–260.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Oğuz, Enis & Bilal Kırkıcı
2023. The processing of morphologically complex words by developing readers of Turkish: a masked priming study. Reading and Writing 36:8 ► pp. 2053 ff. 
Bayram, Fatih, Grazia Di Pisa, Jason Rothman & Roumyana Slabakova
2021. Current Trends and Emerging Methodologies in Charting Heritage Language Grammars. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 545 ff.
Jegerski, Jill & Irina A. Sekerina
2021. The Psycholinguistics of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 449 ff.
Uygun, Serkan & Harald Clahsen
2021. Morphological processing in heritage speakers: A masked priming study on the Turkish aorist. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24:3 ► pp. 415 ff.
Ciaccio, Laura Anna, Naledi Kgolo & Harald Clahsen
2020. Morphological decomposition in Bantu: a masked priming study on Setswana prefixation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:10 ► pp. 1257 ff.
Jacob, Gunnar, Duygu Fatma Şafak, Orhan Demir & Bilal Kırkıcı
2019. Preserved morphological processing in heritage speakers: A masked priming study on Turkish. Second Language Research 35:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Gor, Kira, Anna Chrabaszcz & Svetlana Cook
2018. Early and late learners decompose inflected nouns, but can they tell which ones are inflected correctly?. Journal of Second Language Studies 1:1 ► pp. 106 ff.
JACOB, GUNNAR
2018. Morphological priming in bilingualism research. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21:3 ► pp. 443 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Research Approaches to Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 373 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.