Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 13:1 (2018) ► pp.3873
References (50)
References
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(38), 419–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2004). The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 47(Pt 1), 31–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(5 Pt 1), 3048–3058. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Levelt, W. J. M., Schreuder, R., & Ernestus, M. T. C. (2008). Paradigmatic structure in speech production. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 431, 1–29.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Vasishth, S., Kliegl, R., & Bates, D. (2017). The cave of shadows: Addressing the human factor with generalized additive mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 941, 206–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Wurm, L. H., & Aycock, J. (2007). Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities. The Mental Lexicon, 2(3), 419–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using {lme4}. Journal Of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beddor, P. S., McGowan, K. B., Boland, J. E., Coetzee, A. W., & Brasher, A. (2013). The time course of perception of coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(4), 2350–2366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, A., Brenier, J. M., Gregory, M., Girand, C., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 92–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, A., Jurafsky, D., Fosler-Lussier, E., Girand, C., Gregory, M., & Gildea, D. (2003). Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 1001–1024. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blazej, L. J., & Cohen-Goldberg, A. M. (2015). Can We Hear Morphological Complexity Before Words Are Complex ? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 50–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from [URL]
Brysbaert, M., New, B., & Keuleers, E. (2012). Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies. Behavior Research Methods, 441, 991–997. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, C. (2014). Probabilistic reduction and probabilistic enhancement. Morphology, 24(4), 291–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connine, C. M., Titone, D., & Wang, J. (1993). Auditory word recognition: Extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahan, D., Swingley, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Magnuson, J. S. (2000). Linguistic gender and spoken-word recognition in French. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(4), 465–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Gaskell, M. G. (2002). Leading up the lexical garden path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(1), 218–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Anes, M. D., Weeks, P. A., & McFarlane, D. K. (1996). Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken-language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving-window technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(2), 324–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gahl, S., & Garnsey, S. M. (2004). Knowledge of Grammar, Knowledge of Usage: Syntactic Probabilities Affect Pronunciation Variation. Language, 80(4), 748–775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregory, M. L., Raymond, W. D., Bell, A., Fosler-Lussier, E., & Jurafsky, D. (1999). The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. In Chicago Linguistics Society (Vol. 351, pp. 151–166).Google Scholar
Heinrich, A., Flory, Y., & Hawkins, S. (2010). Influence of English r-resonances on intelligibility of speech in noise for native English and German listeners. Speech Communication, 52(11–12), 1038–1055. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyönä, J., Vainio, S., & Laine, M. (2002). A morphological effect obtains for isolated words but not for words in sentence context. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 417–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., & Raymond, W. D. (2001). Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, 229–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemps, R. J. J .K., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: the case of Dutch plural nouns. Memory & Cognition, 33(3), 430–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemps, R. J. J .K., Wurm, L. H., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Prosodic cues for morphological complexity in Dutch and English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1/2), 43–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., & Bresnan, J. (2012). The effects of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 588–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2007). Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), 2261–2271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1972). {T}he timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51(6.2), 2018–2024. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukyanenko, C., & Fisher, C. (2016). Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns. Cognition, 1461, 349–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magnuson, J. S., Dixon, J. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2007). The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science, 31(1), 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattys, S. L., Barden, K., & Samuel, A. G. (2014). Extrinsic cognitive load impairs low-level speech perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 748–754. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattys, S. L., Brooks, J., & Cooke, M. (2009). Recognizing speech under a processing load: Dissociating energetic from informational factors. Cognitive Psychology, 59(3), 203–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattys, S. L., & Wiget, L. (2011). Effects of cognitive load on speech recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 145–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, R. H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 941, 305–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 47(8), 908–930. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moscoso Del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94(1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 341, 739–773. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]
Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2003). The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 90(1), 51–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuppler, B., Van Dommelen, W. A., Koreman, J., & Ernestus, M. (2012). How linguistic and probabilistic properties of a word affect the realization of its final /t/: Studies at the phonemic and sub-phonemic level. Journal of Phonetics, 40(4), 595–607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabak, W., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Lexical statistics and lexical processing: semantic density, information complexity, sex, and irregularity in Dutch. Linguistic evidence – Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives, (1993), 529–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Producing inflected verbs: A picture naming study. The Mental Lexicon, 5(1), 22–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tily, H., Gahl, S., Arnon, I., Snider, N., Kothari, A., & Bresnan, J. (2009). Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation in spontaneous speech. Language and Cognition, 1(2), 147–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tily, H., & Kuperman, V. (2012). {R}ational phonological lengthening in spoken {D}utch. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 132(6), 3935–3940. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L., & Turk, A. E. (2010). English words on the Procrustean bed: Polysyllabic shortening reconsidered. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 459–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Hashimoto, Daiki
2023. The effect of verbal conjugation predictability on speech signal. Morphology 33:1  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Schlechtweg, Marcel & Holden Härtl
2023. Quotation marks and the processing of irony in English: evidence from a reading time study. Linguistics 61:2  pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Schlechtweg, Marcel, Jörg Peters & Marina Frank
2023. L1 variation and L2 acquisition: L1 German /eː/-/ɛː/ overlap and its effect on the acquisition of L2 English /ɛ/-/æ/. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Lohmann, Arne & Benjamin V. Tucker
Schlechtweg, Marcel & Greville G. Corbett
2021. The duration of word-final s in English: A comparison of regular-plural and pluralia-tantum nouns. Morphology 31:4  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
SCHLECHTWEG, MARCEL & GREVILLE G. CORBETT
2023. Is morphosyntactic agreement reflected in acoustic detail? Thesduration of English regular plural nouns. English Language and Linguistics 27:1  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.