Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 12:3 (2017) ► pp. 283308
References

References

Adelman, J. S., & Estes, Z.
(2013) Emotion and memory: A recognition advantage for positive and negative words independent of arousal. Cognition, 129, 530–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R.
(2007) The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W.
(1999) Perceptual symbol systems. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.Google Scholar
(2003) Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 513–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1281–1289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D.
(2003) Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, L. F., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., & Barsalou, L. W.
(2014) A psychological construction account of emotion regulation and dysregulation: The role of situated conceptualization. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), The Handbook of Emotion Regulation (2nd Ed, pp. 447–465). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S. D. R., Burnett, A. N., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M.
(2011) Imageability and body-object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 1100–1109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 298 ]
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J.
(1999) Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings (Technical Report C-1). Gainesville, FL: Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V.
(2014) Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, L., Westbury, C., & Burgess, C.
(2001) Characterizing the neighborhood: Semantic neighborhood effects in lexical decision and naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 531–544. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B.
(1989) Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 824–845.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, I. S., Leonard, G. A., Pexman, P. M., Pittman, D. J., Siakaluk, P. D., & Goodyear, B. G.
(2012) The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 6:22, 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J.
(1996) Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1331–1356.Google Scholar
Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J., & Pexman, P. M.
(2002) Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 686–713.Google Scholar
Hino, Y., Pexman, P. M., & Lupker, S. J.
(2006) Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks: Are they due to semantic coding? Journal of Memory & Language, 55, 247–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
James, C. T.
(1975) The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 130–136.Google Scholar
Jastrzembski, J. E.
(1981) Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 278–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jastrzembski, J. E., & Stanners, R. F.
(1975) Multiple word meanings and lexical search speed. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 534–537. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juhasz, B. J., & Yap, M. J.
(2013) Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 160–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juhasz, B. J., Yap, M. J., Dicke, J., Taylor, S. C., & Gullick, M. M.
(2011) Tangible words are recognized faster: The grounding of meaning in sensory and perceptual systems. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1683–1691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F.
(2012) Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48, 805–825. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiverstein, J., & Miller, M.
(2015) The embodied brain: Towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 9:237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kousta, S. -T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E.
(2011) The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 14–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kousta, S. -T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G.
(2009) Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112, 473–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 299 ]
Kroll, J. F., & Mervis, J. S.
(1986) Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 92–107.Google Scholar
Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. B.
(2014) Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1065–1081. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M.
(2012) Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 978–990. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T.
(1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lund, K., & Burgess, C.
(1996) Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co- occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moffat, M., Siakaluk, P. D., Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M.
(2015) Situated conceptualization and semantic processing: Effects of emotional experience and context availability in semantic categorization and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 408–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newcombe, P. I., Campbell, C., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M.
(2012) Effects of emotional and sensorimotor knowledge in semantic processing of concrete and abstract nouns. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 6:275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pecher, D.
(2001) Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 545–551. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P. M.
(2012) Meaning based influences on visual word recognition. In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition. Vol. 2 (pp. 24–43). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., Siakaluk, P. D., Bodner, G. E., & Pope, J.
(2008) There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 161–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Holyk, G. G., & Monfils, M. -H.
(2003) Number of features effects and semantic processing. Memory & Cognition, 31, 842–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Hino, Y.
(2002) The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number of features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 542–549. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P. M., & Yap, M. J.
in press). Individual differences in semantic processing: Insights from the Calgary semantic decision project. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
Recio, G., Conrad, M., Hansen, L. B., & Jacobs, A. M.
(2014) On pleasure and thrill: The interplay between arousal and valence during visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 134, 34–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A.
(1970) Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9, 487–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., & Rubenstein, M.
(1971) Homographic entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meanings. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 10, 57–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, G., O’Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C.
(2014) Emotion words and categories: evidence from lexical decision. Cognitive Processing, 15, 209–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C.
(2010) Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 393–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 300 ]
Siakaluk, P. D., Buchanan, L., & Westbury, C.
(2003) The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks. Memory & Cognition, 31, 100–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siakaluk, P. D., Knol, N., & Pexman, P. M.
(2014) Effects of emotional experience for abstract words in the Stroop task. Cognitive Science, 38, 1698–1717. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siakaluk, P. D., Newcombe, P. I., Duffels, B., Li, E., Sidhu, D. M., Yap, M. J., & Pexman, P. M.
(2016) Effects of emotional experience in lexical decision. Frontiers in Psychology. 7:1157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. J., & Sears, C. R.
(2008) Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body- object interaction effect. Cognition, 106, 433–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Sears, C. R., Wilson, K., Locheed, K., & Owen, W. J.
(2008) The benefits of sensorimotor knowledge: Body-object interaction facilitates semantic processing. Cognitive Science, 32, 591–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tillotson, S. M., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M.
(2008) Body-object interaction ratings for 1,618 monosyllabic nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 1075–1078. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M., & Kousta, S.
(2009) Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition, 1, 219–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, D., Ponari, M., & Vigliocco, G.
(2014) How does emotional content affect lexical processing? Cognition and Emotion, 28, 737–746. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M.
(2013) Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1191–1207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wellsby, M., Siakaluk, P. D., Owen, W. J., & Pexman, P. M.
(2011) Embodied semantic processing: The body-object interaction effect in a non-manual task. Language and Cognition, 3, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Barrett, L. F., Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W.
(2011) Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1105–1127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, M. J., Pexman, P. M., Wellsby, M., Hargreaves, I. S., & Huff, M.
(2012) An abundance of riches: Cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, M. J., & Seow, C. S.
(2014) The influence of emotion on lexical processing: Insights from RT distributional analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 526–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, M. J., Tan, S. E., Pexman, P. M., & Hargreaves, I. S.
(2011) Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 742–750. CrossrefGoogle Scholar