Cover not available
Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 12:3 (2017) ► pp.373–403

Verb morphology in speakers with agrammatic aphasia

Language production of English past participles

| University of Potsdam | ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (CCD) | Macquarie University | International Doctorate for Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB), Macquarie University, Sydney (AU), Universities of Groningen (NL), Newcastle (UK), Potsdam (GE) & Trento (IT)
| University of Potsdam
| University of Potsdam
| ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (CCD) | Macquarie University
This paper reports an investigation of the production of verb morphology in English speakers with agrammatic aphasia. Our main goal was to test four accounts of the processing of (ir-)regularity by quantifying regularity using affix type and the presence or absence of stem changes.
Production accuracy of regular, mixed and two types of irregular past participles (irregular 1, irregular 2) was tested in English using a sentence completion task with a group of five speakers with agrammatic aphasia.
The results showed significant effects on production accuracy of whether the verb required a stem change and of time reference frame but no effect of affix type: past participles that required stem changes (mixed and irregular 2 past participles) were more difficult to produce than past participles that did not change their stem (regular and irregular 1 past participles). Moreover, the production of present continuous forms was more accurate compared to past participle forms.
These results suggest that a categorical conception of regular versus irregular is over-simplified, as accuracy was best predicted by stem change rather than by regularity. This is a finding most consistent with the Stem-based Assembly model.
The results of this study have implications for the design and selection of stimuli in future experiments: Experimental stimuli need to be controlled for stem changes and affix type rather than assuming that irregular verbs are homogeneous.
Keywords: agrammatic aphasia, language production, regular and irregular verbs, English past participles, morphology, sentence completion
Article outline
  • Linguistic background: English past participle formation
  • Explanatory approaches to processing and representation of verb morphology
  • Regular and irregular verbs in the study of language production in people with agrammatic Broca’s aphasia
  • Cross-linguistics differences in the study of (ir-)regularity
  • Aims and predictions
  • Methodology
    • Participants
    • Material and design
    • Procedure
    • Scoring
    • Data analysis
  • Results
    • Quantitative analysis
    • Qualitative analysis
  • Discussion
    • The effect of stem change and affix type
    • Graded patterns of accuracy
    • Structural differences across languages and their influence on language production
    • Time reference
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 16 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.17006.mar
References (53)
References
Algeo, J. (2009). The origins and development of the English language. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 31, 232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, H. R., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical data base on CD-ROM. (Philadephia, PA)Google Scholar
Bastiaanse, R. (2008). Production of verbs in base position by Dutch agrammatic speakers: Inflection versus finiteness. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 211, 104–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R., Bamyaci, E., Hsu, C. -J., Lee, J., Duman, T. Y., & Thompson, C. K. (2011). Time reference in agrammatic aphasia: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 241, 652–673. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R., & Jonkers, R. (2012). Linguistic accounts of agrammatic aphasia. In R. Bastiaanse & C. K. Thompson (Eds.), Perspectives on Agrammatism, (pp. 17–33). London, New York: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D. M. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News, 51, 27–31.Google Scholar
Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 [Computer software manual]. (R package version 1.1–5)Google Scholar
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & Wulfeck, B. (2001). Psycholinguistics: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 521, 369–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Friederici, A. D., & Wulfeck, B. (1987). Comprehension in aphasia: A crosslinguistic study. Brain and Language, 321, 19–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., & MacWhinney, B. (1991). Crosslinguistic research in aphasia: An overview. Brain and Language, 411, 123–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bird, H., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Seidenberg, M. S., McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. (2003). Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: What’s the connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 481, 502–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cholin, J., Rapp, B., & Miozzo, M. (2010). When do combinatorial mechanisms apply in the production of inflected words? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 271, 334–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: a multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 991–1060. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2010). ‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 631, 83–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, C. J. (2005). N-watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 371, 65–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faroqi-Shah, Y. (2007). Are regular and irregular verbs dissociated in non-fluent aphasia? Brain Research Bulletin, 741, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fix, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2006). Morphophonological structure and agrammatic regular/irregular past-tense production. Brain and Language, 991, 155–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fruchter, J., Stockall, L., & Marantz, A. (2013). MEG masked priming evidence for form-based decomposition of irregular verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 71, 798. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, J. (1968). Vorreden zur Deutschen Grammatik von 1819 und 1822. Mit einem Vorwort zum Neudruck von Hugo Steger. [Prefeces to German grammar 1819 to 1822. With an introduction to the reprint by Hugo Steger]. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helbig, G., & Buscha, J. (2006). Deutsche Grammatik [German grammar]. Berlin, München: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 434–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 961, 7592–7597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Imaging the past: Neural activation in frontal and temporal regions during regular and irregular past-tense processing. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 51, 282–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Justus, T., Larsen, J., de Mornay Davies, P., & Swick, D. (2008). Interpreting dissociations between regular and irregular past-tense morphology: Evidence from event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 81, 178–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery. New York: Grune Stratton.Google Scholar
Kliegl, R., Wei, P., Dambacher, M., Yan, M., & Zhou, X. (2011). Experimental effects and individual differences in linear mixed models: Estimating the relation of spatial, object, and attraction effects in visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mailhammer, R. (2007). Islands of resilience: The history of the German strong verbs from a systemic point of view. Morphology, 171, 77–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 291, 189–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1997). Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature, 3871, 592–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marusch, T., von der Malsburg, T., Bastiaanse, R., & Burchert, F. (2012). Tense morphology in German agrammatism: The production of regular, irregular and mixed verbs. The Mental Lexicon, 71, 351–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miceli, G., Silveri, M., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Variations in the pattern of omissions and substitutions of grammatical morphemes in the spontaneous speech of so-called agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 361, 447–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (2004). Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic complexity on word production in aphasia: It’s the number of phonemes that counts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 211, 57–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penke, M., Janssen, U., & Krause, M. (1999). The representation of inflectional morphology: Evidence from Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 681, 225–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penke, M., & Westermann, G. (2006). Broca’s area and inflectional morphology: Evidence from Broca’s aphasia and computer modeling. Cortex, 421, 563–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, J., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 2531, 530–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1994). Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammer. In S. D. Lima, R. Corrigan, & G. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 321–351). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2004). On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Communination, 431, 103–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 413–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1973). A grammar of contemporary English. Harlow: Longman Group.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Roth, C. (2011). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. In J. S. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, & B. Caplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 428–430). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, K., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Grammatical processing of nouns and verbs in the left frontal cortex? Neuropsychologia, 411, 1189–1198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Khader, P. H., Wiese, R., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for the continuous processing of linguistic categories of regular and irregular verb inflection in German. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 251, 1284–1304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Zwitzerlood, P., & Rösler, F. (2007). Stem access in regular and irregular inflections: Evidence from German principles. Journal of Memory and Language, 571, 325–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swinburn, K., Porter, G., & Howard, D. (2004). Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 301, 37–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 921, 231–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., & Pinker, S. (1997). A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 91, 266–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, D., & Fabri, R. (1995). Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 141, 236–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Cordonier, Natacha, Evodie Schaffner, Lana Zeroual & Marion Fossard
2024. Time reference in aphasia: are there differences between tenses and aphasia fluency type? A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 15 DOI logo
de Aguiar, Vânia & Adrià Rofes
2022. The noun-verb distinction. In The Temporal Lobe [Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 187], ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Ciaccio, Laura Anna, Frank Burchert & Carlo Semenza
2020. Derivational Morphology in Agrammatic Aphasia: A Comparison Between Prefixed and Suffixed Words. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Heitmeier, Maria & R. Harald Baayen
2020. Simulating phonological and semantic impairment of English tense inflection with linear discriminative learning. The Mental Lexicon 15:3 ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.