Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 13:2 (2018) ► pp. 186214
References

References

Alegre, M. A., & Gordon, P.
(1996) Red rats eater exposes recursion in children’s word formation. Cognition, 60, 65–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allan, D.
(2004) Oxford Placement Test 2: Test Pack. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 211 ]
Aronoff, M.
(1976) Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H.
(1993) The CELEX lexical data base on CD-ROM.Google Scholar
Barr, D. J.
(2013) Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berent, I., & Pinker, S.
(2007) The dislike of regular plurals in compounds: Phonological familiarity or morphological constraint? The Mental Lexicon, 2, 129–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, S.-J.
(2012) Imaging brain development: the adolescent brain. Neuroimage, 61, 397–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, H.
(1988) On the morphological parallelism between compounds and constructs. In G. Booji & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology, 1 (pp. 45–65). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Budd, M.-J., Paulmann, S., Barry, C., & Clahsen, H.
(2013) Brain potentials during language production in children and adults: An ERP study of the English past tense. Brain and Language, 127, 345–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Producing morphologically complex words: An ERP study with children and adults. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 51–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casey, B., Tottenham, N., Liston, C., & Durston, S.
(2005) Imaging the developing brain: what have we learned about cognitive development? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 104–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H.
(1999) Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991–1013. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Dual-mechanism morphology. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (Vol. 4, pp 1–5). Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Behavioral methods for investigating morphological and syntactic processing in children. In I. Sekerina, E. Fernández, & H. Clahsen, (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children’s language processing (pp. 1–27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Gerth, S., Heyer, V., & Schott, E.
(2015) Morphology constrains native and non-native word formation in different ways: Evidence from plurals inside compounds. The Mental Lexicon, 10, 53–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Reifegerste, J.
(2017) Morphological processing in old-age bilinguals. In M. Libben, T. Gollan, & G. Libben (Eds.), Bilingualism: A framework for understanding the mental lexicon (pp. 217–247). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. Council for Cultural Co-operation. Education Committee. Modern Languages Division
(2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambrige, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cunnings, I., & Clahsen, H.
(2007) The time-course of morphological constraints: Evidence from eye-movements during reading. Cognition, 104, 476–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, A.-M., & Williams, E.
(1987) On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 212 ]
Festman, J., & Clahsen, H.
(2016) How Germans prepare for the English past tense: Silent production of inflected words during EEG. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 487–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P.
(2006) Synthetic compounding in the English interlanguage of Basque–Spanish bilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3, 231–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldrick, M., Putnam, M., & Schwarz, L.
(2016) Coactivation in bilingual grammars: A computational account of code mixing. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 19, 857–876. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P.
(1985) Level-ordering in lexical development. Cognition, 21, 73–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haskell, T. R., MacDonald, M. C., & Seidenberg, M. S.
(2003) Language learning and innateness: Some implications of compounds research. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 119–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holm, S.
(1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70. Stable URL: http://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/4615733
Hopp, H.
(2010) Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29, 33–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Indefrey, P.
(2011) The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J.
(2004) The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., & Wexler, K.
(2002) Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research, 18, 95–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaensch, C., Heyer, V., Gordon, P., & Clahsen, H.
(2014) What plurals and compounds reveal about constraints in word formation. Language Acquisition, 21, 319–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, D. P., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J.
(2002) Inflectional frames in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 209–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kappenman, E. S., & Luck, S.
(2010) The effects of electrode impedance on data quality and statistical significance in ERP recordings. Psychopshysiology 47, 888–904. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P.
(1982) From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations, Part 1 (pp. 131–75). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Koester, D., & Schiller, N. O.
(2008) Morphological priming in overt language production: Electrophysiological evidence from Dutch. Neuroimage, 42, 1622–1630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(1995) L2 acquisition of English synthetic compounding is not constrained by level-ordering (and neither, probably, is L1). Second Language Research, 11, 20–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 213 ]
Lawrence, M.
(2016) ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. R package version 4.2. https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=ezGoogle Scholar
Legendre, G., Miyata, Y., & Smolensky, P.
(1990) Harmonic grammar – A formal multi-level connectionist theory of linguistic well-formedness: Theoretical foundations. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 388–395). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, V. A.
(2000) Compounding and the representation of L2 inflectional morphology. Language Learning, 50, 153–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oyang, G., Sommer, W., Zhou, C., Aristei, S., Pinkpank, T., & Rahman, R. A.
(2016) Articulation artefacts during overt language production in Event-Related Brain Potentials: Description and correction. Brain topography, 29, 791–813. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pater, J.
(2009) Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. Cognitive Science, 33, 999–1035. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T.
(2002) The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 456–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prado, E. L., & Ullman, M. T.
(2009): Can imageability help us draw the line between storage and composition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 35, 849–866. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Ramscar, M., & Dye, M.
(2011) Learning language from the input: Why innate constraints can’t explain noun compounding. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Runnqvist, E., Strijkers, K., Sadat, J., & Costa, A.
(2011) On the temporal and functional origin of L2 disadvantages in speech production: A critical review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sahin, N. T., Pinker, S., Cash, S. S., Schomer, D., & Halgren, E.
(2009) Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca’s area. Science, 326, 445–449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., MacDonald, M. C., & Haskell, T. R.
(2007) Semantics and phonology constrain compound formation. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 287–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva, R., Gerth, S., & Clahsen, H.
(2013) Morphological constraints in children’s spoken language comprehension: A visual world study of plurals inside compounds in English. Cognition, 129, 457–469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smolensky, P., Goldrick, M., & Mathis, D.
(2014) Optimization and quantization in gradient symbol systems: A framework for integrating the continuous and the discrete in cognition. Cognitive Science, 38, 1102–1138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sonnenstuhl, I. & Huth, A.
(2002) Processing and representation of German n-plurals. A dual mechanism approach. Brain & Language, 81, 276–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veríssimo, J.
(2016) Extending a Gradient Symbolic approach to the native versus non-native contrast: The case of plurals in compounds. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 19, 900–902. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 214 ]
White, L.
(2002) Morphological variability in endstate L2 grammars: The question of L1 influence. In A. Do, S. Fish, & B. Skarabela (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 758–768). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar