Morphological generalization of Hebrew verb classes
An elicited production study in native and non-native speakers
The present work investigated how morphological generalization, namely the way speakers extend their knowledge to
novel complex words, is influenced by sources of variability in language and speaker properties. For this purpose, the study
focused on a Semitic language (Hebrew), characterized by unique non-concatenative morphology, and native (L1) as well as
non-native (L2) speakers. Two elicited production tasks tested what information sources speakers employ in verbal inflectional
class generalization, i.e., in forming complex novel verbs. Phonological similarity was tested in Experiment 1 and argument structure in Experiment 2. The analysis focused on the
two most common Hebrew inflectional classes, Paal and Piel, which also constituted the vast
majority of responses in the two tasks. Unlike the commonly found outcomes in Romance inflectional class generalization, the
results yielded, solely for Piel, a graded phonological similarity effect and a robust argument structure effect, i.e., more Piel
responses in a direct object context than without. The L2 pattern partially differed from the L1: (i) argument structure effect
for L2 speakers was weaker, and (ii) L2 speakers produced more Paal than Piel responses. The results are discussed within the
framework of rule-based and input-based accounts.
Article outline
- Generalization of Hebrew verb classes
- Morphological generalization in non-native (L2) speakers
- The present study
- Experiment 1
- Method
- Participants
- Simulation
- Materials
- Procedure
- Data analysis
- Results
- Experiment 2
- Method
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure
- Data analysis
- Results
- Discussion
- Language-specific effects on morphological generalization
- Speaker-specific effects on morphological generalization
- Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Agathopoulou, E., & Papadopoulou, D.
(
2009)
Regularity patterns of the Greek past perfective: a psycholinguistic study. In
G. K. Giannakis,
Μ. Baltazani,
G. I. Xydopoulos &
Α. Tsangalidis (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Greek linguistics, Ioannina (pp. 1–13).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Albright, A.
(
2002)
Islands of reliability for regular morphology: Evidence from Italian.
Language, 684–709.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Albright, A., & Hayes, B.
(
2003)
Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study.
Cognition, 901, 119–161.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aronoff, M.
(
1994)
Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. MIT press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
(
2008)
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items.
Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P.
(
2010)
Analyzing reaction times.
International Journal of Psychological Research, 31, 12–28.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berent, I., Pinker, S., & Shimron, J.
(
1999)
Default nominal inflection in Hebrew: Evidence for mental variables.
Cognition, 721, 1–44.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berent, I., & Shimron, J.
(
1997)
The representation of Hebrew words: Evidence from the obligatory contour principle.
Cognition, 641, 39–72.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, R. A.
(
1993)
Marking of verb transitivity by Hebrew-speaking children.
Journal of Child Language, 201, 641–669.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, R. A.
(
1997)
Modern Hebrew. In
R. Hetzron (Ed.),
The Semitic languages (pp. 312–333). New York: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolozky, S.
(
1999a)
Measuring productivity in word formation: The case of Israeli Hebrew. Brill.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolozky, S.
(
1999b)
On the special status of the vowels a and e in Israeli Hebrew.
Hebrew Studies, 401, 233–250.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(
2015)
Structure, form, and meaning in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Arabic.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 301, 955–992.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brooks, P. J., Braine, M. D., Catalano, L., Brody, R. E., & Sudhalter, V.
(
1993)
Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning.
Journal of Memory and Language, 321, 76–95.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brovetto, C., & Ullman, M. T.
(
2005)
The mental representation and processing of Spanish verbal morphology. In
Eddington, D. (Ed.),
Selected proceedings of the 7th hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 98–105). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. L., & Moder, C. L.
(
1983)
Morphological classes as natural categories.
Language, 251–270.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, L., Shu, H. U. A., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P.
(
2007)
ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 101, 161–174.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
(
2006)
Grammatical processing in language learners.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 271, 3–42.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
(
2018)
Some notes on the shallow structure hypothesis.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 401, 693–706.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culbertson, J., Gagliardi, A., & Smith, K.
(
2017)
Competition between phonological and semantic cues in noun class learning.
Journal of Memory and Language, 921, 343–358.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culbertson, J., & Wilson, C.
(
2013)
Artificial grammar learning of shape-based noun classification. In
M. Knauff,
M. Pauen,
N. Sebanz, &
I. Wachsmuth (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 2118–2123). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cuskley, C., Colaiori, F., Castellano, C., Loreto, V., Pugliese, M., & Tria, F.
(
2015)
The adoption of linguistic rules in native and non-native speakers: Evidence from a Wug task.
Journal of Memory and Language, 841, 205–223.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dawdy-Hesterberg, L. G., & Pierrehumbert, J. B.
(
2014)
Learnability and generalisation of Arabic broken plural nouns.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 291, 1268–1282.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deutsch, A.
(
2016)
The separability of morphological processes from semantic meaning and syntactic class in production of single words: Evidence from the Hebrew root morpheme.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 451, 1–28.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dewaele, J. M., & Véronique, D.
(
2001)
Gender assignment and gender agreement in advanced French interlanguage: A cross-sectional study.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 41, 275–297.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dussias, P. E., Marful, A., Gerfen, C., & Molina, M. T. B.
(
2010)
Usage frequencies of complement-taking verbs in Spanish and English: Data from Spanish monolinguals and Spanish-English bilinguals.
Behavior Research Methods, 421, 1004–1011.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dussias, P. E., & Scaltz, T. R. C.
(
2008)
Spanish-English L2 speakers’ use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading.
Acta Psychologica, 1281, 501–513.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eddington, D.
(
2000)
Analogy and the dual-route model of morphology.
Lingua, 1101, 281–298.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eddington, D.
(
2002)
Dissociation in Italian conjugations: A single-route account.
Brain and Language, 811, 291–302.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farhy, Y., & Veríssimo, J.
(
2019)
Semantic Effects in Morphological Priming: The Case of Hebrew Stems.
Language and Speech, 621, 737–750.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farhy, Y., Veríssimo, J., & Clahsen, H.
(
2018a)
Universal and particular in morphological processing: Evidence from Hebrew.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 711, 1125–1133.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farhy, Y., Veríssimo, J., & Clahsen, H.
(
2018b)
Do late bilinguals access pure morphology during word recognition? A masked-priming study on Hebrew as a second language.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 211, 945–951.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fisher, C., Hall, D. G., Rakowitz, S., & Gleitman, L.
(
1994)
When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth.
Lingua, 921, 333–375.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frigo, L., & McDonald, J. L.
(
1998)
Properties of phonological markers that affect the acquisition of gender-like subclasses.
Journal of Memory and Language, 391, 218–245.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A.
(
1997)
The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences.
Journal of Memory and Language, 371, 58–93.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hahn, U., & Nakisa, R. C.
(
2000)
German inflection: Single route or dual route?.
Cognitive Psychology, 411, 313–360.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hahne, A., Mueller, J. L., & Clahsen, H.
(
2006)
Morphological processing in a second language: Behavioral and event-related brain potential evidence for storage and decomposition.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 181, 121–134.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopp, H.
(
2013)
Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability.
Second Language Research, 291, 33–56.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Itai, A., & Wintner, S.
(
2008)
Language resources for Hebrew.
Language Resources and Evaluation, 421, 75–98.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ionin, T., & Montrul, S.
(
2010)
The role of L1 transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2 English.
Language Learning, 601, 877–925.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaeger, T. F.
(
2008)
Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models.
Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 434–446.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiang, N.
(
2004)
Morphological insensitivity in second language processing.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 251, 603–634.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiang, N.
(
2007)
Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning.
Language Learning, 571, 1–33.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hudson Kam, C. L., & Newport, E. L.
(
2005)
Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change.
Language Learning and Development, 11, 151–195.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kam, C. L. H., & Newport, E. L.
(
2009)
Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages.
Cognitive Psychology, 591, 30–66.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krause, H., Bosch, S., & Clahsen, H.
(
2015)
Morphosyntax in the bilingual mental lexicon: An experimental study of strong stems in German.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 371, 597–621.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leikin, M., Schwartz, M., & Share, D. L.
(
2010)
General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: a Russian-Hebrew study of beginning literacy.
Reading and Writing, 231, 269–292.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leiner, D. J.
(
2016)
SoSci Survey (
Version 2.6.00) [Computer software]. Available at
[URL]
Levy, Y.
(
1983)
The acquisition of Hebrew plurals: The case of the missing gender category.
Journal of Child Language, 101, 107–121.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthews, C.
(
2010)
On the nature of phonological cues in the acquisition of French gender categories: Evidence from instance-based learning models.
Lingua, 1201, 879–900.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D.
(
2017)
Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models.
Journal of Memory and Language, 941, 305–315.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCarthy, C.
(
2008)
Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation.
Second Language Research, 241, 459–486.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonald, J. L.
(
2006)
Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners.
Journal of Memory and Language, 551, 381–401.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonald, J. L., & Roussel, C. C.
(
2010)
Past tense grammaticality judgment and production in non-native and stressed native English speakers.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 131, 429–448.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montrul, S.
(
2011)
Morphological errors in Spanish second language learners and heritage speakers.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 331, 163–192.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T.
(
2010)
Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study.
Language Learning, 601, 154–193.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T.
(
2012)
Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 241, 933–947.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Naigles, L. R.
(
1996)
The use of multiple frames in verb learning via syntactic bootstrapping.
Cognition, 581, 221–251.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Naigles, L. G., & Kako, E. T.
(
1993)
First contact in verb acquisition: Defining a role for syntax.
Child Development, 641, 1665–1687.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parodi, T., Schwartz, B. D., & Clahsen, H.
(
2004)
On the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of German nominals.
Linguistics, 669–706.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S.
(
1999)
Words and rules. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S.
(
2013)
Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. MIT press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plag, I.
(
2000)
Irregular past tense formation in English interlanguage.
Language Use, Language Acquisition and Language History. (Mostly) Empirical Studies in Honour of Rüdiger Zimmermann, 134–149.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prasada, S., & Pinker, S.
(
1993)
Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 81, 1–56.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramscar, M.
(
2002)
The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule.
Cognitive Psychology, 451, 45–94.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reeder, P. A., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N.
(
2017)
Distributional learning of subcategories in an artificial grammar: Category generalization and subcategory restrictions.
Journal of Memory and Language, 971, 17–29.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L.
(
1986)
On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In
J. L. McClelland,
D. E. Rumelhart, & The PDP Research Group (Eds.).
Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol.21, pp.216–271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Say, T., & Clahsen, H.
(
2002)
Words, rules and stems in the Italian mental lexicon. In
S. Nooteboom,
F. Weerman, &
F. Wijnen (Eds.),
Storage and computation in the language faculty (pp. 93–129). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schuler, K. D., Reeder, P. A., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N.
(
2017)
The effect of Zipfian frequency variations on category formation in adult artificial language learning.
Language Learning and Development, 131, 357–374.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skousen, R., Lonsdale, D., & Parkinson, D. B.
Stavrakaki, S., & Clahsen, H.
(
2009)
The perfective past tense in Greek child language.
Journal of Child Language, 361, 113–142.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steinhauer, K., White, E. J., & Drury, J. E.
(
2009)
Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
Second Language Research, 251, 13–41.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traxler, M. J.
(
2005)
Plausibility and verb subcategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: Evidence from self-paced reading.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 341, 1–30.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Velan, H., & Frost, R.
(
2011)
Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?.
Cognition, 1181, 141–156.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Veríssimo, J., & Clahsen, H.
(
2014)
Variables and similarity in linguistic generalization: Evidence from inflectional classes in Portuguese.
Journal of Memory and Language, 761, 61–79.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M., & Leung, Y. K. I.
(
2004)
Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 251, 105–133.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, M. P., & Garnsey, S. M.
(
2009)
Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences.
Journal of Memory and Language, 601, 368–392.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Clahsen, Harald & Anna Jessen
2021.
Morphological generalization in bilingual language production: Age of acquisition determines variability.
Language Acquisition 28:4
► pp. 370 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Marzi, Claudia & Vito Pirrelli
2023.
A discriminative information-theoretical analysis of the regularity gradient in inflectional morphology.
Morphology 33:4
► pp. 459 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.