Cover not available
Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 15:3 (2020) ► pp.464–484

Does verb transitivity influence word association responses?

| Keimyung University, Korea
Although several studies have investigated the influence of the grammatical class of cue words on response patterns in the word association task, relatively little is known about the influence of more fine-grained distinctions such as cue transitivity. The present study tests two predictions, made in existing studies, of the influence of this variable. The first is that cue transitivity would influence the grammatical class of responses; the second, that it would affect the directionality of position-based, or syntagmatic, responses. English language associative responses to 49 transitive and 49 intransitive cues were gathered from 53 English L1 respondents. These responses were then analysed according to their grammatical class and categorical designation. Results suggested that cue transitivity influences both of these measurements: transitive cues yielded more noun responses and more associations classified as likely to follow the cue in text than did intransitives, while transitives received more verb responses and more associations likely to precede the cue. These results are discussed in the light of contiguity-based and semantic theories of the determinants of word association.
Keywords: word association, transitivity, grammatical class, co-occurrence, semantics
Article outline
  • Previous research on transitivity and lexical processing
  • Investigating the influence of cue transitivity
    • Predictions
    • Method
      • Cue selection
      • Categorization of data
  • Results
    • Grammatical class of responses
    • Response categorisation
    • Response distribution
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 January 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20019.thw
References (36)
References
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., & Đurđević, D. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 1181, 428–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bøyum, M. (2016). A new word association test for Norwegian. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Brown, R., & Berko, J. (1960). Word Association and the Acquisition of Grammar. Child Development, 31(1), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Category: English intransitive verbs (n.d.). In Wiktionary. Retrieved 14th August 2017. [URL]
Charles, W. G., & Miller, G. A. (1989). Contexts of antonymous adjectives. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10(03), 357–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1970). Word Associations and linguistic theory. In New Horizons in Linguistics (pp. 271–286). Penguin.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. In Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 2nd1, p. 567).Google Scholar
Cramer, P. (1968). Word Association. Academic Press.Google Scholar
De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. (2008). Word associations: network and semantic properties. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 824–845.Google Scholar
DeDe, G. (2014). Verb Transitivity Bias Affects On-line Sentence Reading in People with Aphasia. Aphasiology, 27(3), 326–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deese, J. (1962). Form class and the determinants of association. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 79–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Entwisle, D. R. (1966). Form Class and Children’s Word Associations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 51, 558–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervin, S. M. (1961). Changes with Age in the Verbal Determinants of Word-Association. The American Journal of Psychology, 74(3), 361–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (2006). Habits and Rabbits: Word associations and the L2 lexicon. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, M. Medved Krajnovic, & J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 61 (pp. 121–145). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Word association patterns: unpacking the assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 319–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T., Playfoot, D., Wray, A., & Wright, M. J. (2015). Establishing the Reliability of Word Association Data for Investigating Individual and Group Differences. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 23–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guida, A., & Lenci, A. (2007). Semantic properties of word associations to Italian verbs. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 191(2007), 293–326.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. In Language (Vol. 56, Issue 2, pp. 251–299). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubíček, M., Kilgariff, A., & Kovář, V. (2013). The tenten corpus family. Proceedings of the 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., & Raymond, W. D. (2000). Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production. In J. Bybee & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 229–254). John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Kang, B. (2018). Collocation and word association: Comparing collocation measuring methods. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(1), 85–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 441, 978–990. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 921, 57–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McRae, K., Khalkhali, S., & Hare, M. (2012). Semantic and Associative Relations in Adolescents and Young Adults: Examining A Tenuous Dichotomy. In V. F. Reyna, S. B. Chapman, M. R. Dougherty, & J. Confrey (Eds.), The Adolescent Brain: Learning, Reasoning, and Decision Making (pp. 39–66). American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nissen, H. B., & Henriksen, B. (2006). Word class influence on word association test results. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 389–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polzella, D. J., & Rohrman, N. L. (1970). Psychological aspects of transitive verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(5), 537–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spence, D. P., & Owens, K. C. (1990). Lexical co-occurrence and association strength. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19(5), 317–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A., Lieven, E., Pine, J., & Rowland, C. (2001). The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb argument structure. Journal of Child Language, 281, 127–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thwaites, P. (2019a). Are Grammatical Class Effects on L1 Word Association Responses Independent of Cue Frequency, Age-of-acquisition, and Concreteness? Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 35.2, 105–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019b). “Lexical and Distributional Influences on Word Association Response Generation.” Unpublished PhD Thesis. Cardiff University.Google Scholar
(Submitted). What explains weak correlations between word association and corpus co-occurrence? Manuscript submitted for publication.
van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 671(January 2015), 1176–1190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vivas, L., Manoiloff, L., García, A. M., Lizarralde, F., & Vivas, J. (2019). Core Semantic Links or Lexical Associations: Assessing the Nature of Responses in Word Association Tasks. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(1), 243–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wettler, M., Rapp, R., & Sedlmeier, P. (2005). Free Word Associations Correspond to Contiguities Between Words in Texts*. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 12(2–3), 111–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Thwaites, Peter
2022. Exploring the impact of lexical context on word association responses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 27:3 ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.