Cover not available
Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 17:1 (2022) ► pp.104–131

A N400 event-related potential elicitation paradigm for Canadian French speakers

| McGill University | Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR – Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital (JRH) of the CISSS de Laval) | Université de Montréal | Research Centre, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM) of the CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l’Île de-Montréal
| McGill University
| McGill University
| McGill University
| McGill University
| McGill University | Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR – Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital (JRH) of the CISSS de Laval)
| McGill University | Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR – Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital (JRH) of the CISSS de Laval)
| McGill University | Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR – Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital (JRH) of the CISSS de Laval)
The N400 event-related brain potential (ERP) can be used to evaluate language comprehension, and may be a particularly powerful tool for the assessment of individuals who are behaviourally unresponsive. This study presents a set of semantic violation sentences developed in Canadian French and characterizes their ability to elicit an N400 effect in healthy adults. A novel set of 100 French sentences were created and normed through two surveys that assessed sentence cloze probability (n = 98) and semantic plausibility (n = 99). The best 80 sentences (40 congruent; 40 incongruent) were selected for the final stimulus set and tested for their ability to elicit N400 effects in 33 French-speaking individuals. The final stimulus set successfully generated an N400 effect in the grand-average across all individuals, and in the grand-average within age groups (young, middle-age, and older adults). On a single-subject level, the final stimulus set elicited N400 effects in 76% of the participants. The feasibility of using this stimulus set to assess semantic processing in behaviourally unresponsive individuals was demonstrated in a case example of a French individual in a disorder of consciousness. These sentences enable the inclusion of Canadian French speakers in this simple assessment of language comprehension abilities.
Keywords: N400 ERP component, cloze probability, semantic plausibility rating, Canadian French N400 elicitation paradigm, Canadian French
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Phase 1: Sentence creation and norming
    • 2.1Materials and method
      • 2.1.1Sentence creation
      • 2.1.2Sentence norming
      • 2.1.3Participants
    • 2.2Results
      • Participant characteristics
      • Prospective N400 sentences characteristics
  • 3.Phase 2: N400 event-related potential validation
    • 3.1Materials and methods
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Stimulus presentation
      • 3.1.3Electroencephalographic recording and pre-processing
      • 3.1.4Event-related potential analysis
    • 3.2Results
      • 3.2.1Participants correctly identified the congruent and incongruent sentences
      • 3.2.2The final stimulus sentences set generated N400 event-related potentials
      • 3.2.3The final stimulus set generated N400 ERPs across all age groups
      • 3.2.4Individual responses to sentences varied between age groups
  • 4.Case application: Disorders of consicousness
    • 4.1Materials and methods
    • 4.2Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 25 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20032.aze
References (45)
References
Alcaide-Aguirre, R. E., Warschausky, S. A., Brown, D., Aref, A., & Huggins, J. E. (2017). Asynchronous brain–computer interface for cognitive assessment in people with cerebral palsy. Journal of Neural Engineering, 14 (6), 066001. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angrilli, A., Penolazzi, B., Vespignani, F., De Vincenzi, M., Job, R., Ciccarelli, L., Palomba, D., & Stegagno, L. (2002). Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 322 (1), 5–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blain-Moraes, S., Boshra, R., Ma, H. K., Mah, R., Ruiter, K., Avidan, M., Connolly, J. F., & Mashour, G. A. (2016). Normal Brain Response to Propofol in Advance of Recovery from Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrne, J. M., Dywan, C. A., & Connolly, J. F. (1995). Assessment of children’s receptive vocabulary using event-related brain potentials: Development of a clinically valid test. Child Neuropsychology, 1 (3), 211–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chetail, F., Colin, C., & Content, A. (2012). Electrophysiological markers of syllable frequency during written word recognition in French. Neuropsychologia, 50 (14), 3429–3439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J. F., Phillips, N. A., Stewart, S. H., & Brake, W. G. (1992). Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences. Brain and Language, 43 (1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, R. C. N., Marchand, Y., Eskes, G. A., Harrison, E. R., Phillips, S. J., Major, A., & Connolly, J. F. (2003). Electrophysiological assessment of language function following stroke. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114 1, 662–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desrochers, A. (2006). OMNILEX: Une base de données sur le lexique du français contemporain. Cahiers linguistiques d’Ottawa, 341, 25–34.Google Scholar
Duncan, C., Barry, R., Connolly, J. F., Fischer, C., Michie, P., Naatanen, R., Polich, J., Reinvang, I., & Van Petten, C. (2009). Event-related potentials in clinical research: Guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300 and N400. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120 1, 1883–1908. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., Kutas, M., & Schul, R. (2010). Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain and Language, 115 (3), 149–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., De Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39 (2), 133–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., Van Petten, C., Schwartz, T. J., & Kutas, M. (2003). Sounds, Words, Sentences: Age-Related Changes Across Levels of Language Processing. Psychology and Aging, 18 (4), 858–872. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, C., Luaute, J., & Morlet, D. (2010). Event-related potentials (MMN and novelty P3) in permanent vegetative or minimally conscious states. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 121 (7), 1032–1042. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntatic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22 (5), 1219–1248.Google Scholar
Giacino, J., Kalmar, K., & Whyte, J. (2004). The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: Measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85 (12), 2020–2029. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunter, T. C., Jackson, J. L., & Mulder, G. (1992). An Electrophysiological Study of Semantic Processing in Young and Middle-Aged Academics. Psychophysiology, 29 (1), 38–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. 191.Google Scholar
Isel, F., Hahne, A., Maess, B., & Friederici, A. D. (2007). Neurodynamics of sentence interpretation: ERP evidence from French. Biological Psychology, 74 (3), 337–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmotsu, N., Girard, H. M., Kucukboyaci, N. E., McEvoy, L. K., Hagler, D. J., Dale, A. M., Halgren, E., & McDonald, C. R. (2012). Age-Related Changes in the Neurophysiology of Language in Adults: Relationship to Regional Cortical Thinning and White Matter Microstructure. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32 (35), 12204–12213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotchoubey, B. (2005). Event-related potential measures of consciousness: Two equations with three unknowns. Progress in Brain Research, 150 1, 427–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62 1, 621–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Event-related potentials to semantically inapprpriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11 1, 99–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & Iragui, V. (1998). The N400 in a semantic categorization task across 6 decades. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 108 (5), 456–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & van Petten, C. (1994). Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related potential investigations. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 83–143). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C. (1998). Event-related brain potential studies of language. Advances in Psychophysiology, 3 1, 139–187.Google Scholar
Lai, C. L., Lin, R. T., Liou, L. M., & Liu, C. K. (2010). The role of event-related potentials in cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Clinical Neurophysiology, 121(2), 194–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. S., Lee, S. H., Moon, E. O., Moon, Y. J., Kim, S., Kim, S. H., & Jung, I. K. (2013). Neuropsychological correlates of the P300 in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 401, 62–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, R., Song, W., Du, J., Huo, S., & Shan, G. (2015). Connecting the P300 to the diagnosis and prognosis of unconscious patients. Neural Regeneration Research, 10 (3), 473–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13 (02), 201–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paller, K. A., Kutas, M., & Mayes, A. R. (1987). Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 67 (4), 360–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, D. C., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2009). The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annual Review of Psychology, 60 1, 173–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrin, F., Schnakers, C., Schabus, M., Degueldre, C., Goldman, S., Brédart, S., Faymonville, M.-E., Lamy, M., Moonen, G., Luxen, A., Maquet, P., & Laureys, S. (2006). Brain response to one’s own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome. Archives of Neurology, 63 (4), 562–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Risetti, M., Formisano, R., Toppi, J., Quitadamo, L. R., Bianchi, L., Astolfi, L., Cincotti, F., & Mattia, D. (2013). On ERPs detection in disorders of consciousness rehabilitation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7 1, 775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robichon, F., Besson, M., & Faïta, F. (1996). Normes de complétion pour 744 contextes linguistiques français de différents formats. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 50(2), 205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, R. A., Bussière, M., Froeschl, M., & Nathan, H. J. (2014). Auditory-evoked potentials during coma: Do they improve our prediction of awakening in comatose patients? Journal of Critical Care, 29 (1), 93–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohaut, B., Faugeras, F., Chausson, N., King, J.-R., Karoui, I. E., Cohen, L., & Naccache, L. (2015). Probing ERP correlates of verbal semantic processing in patients with impaired consciousness. Neuropsychologia, 66 1, 279–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabourin, L., Leclerc, J. C., Lapierre, M., Burkholder, M., & Brien, C. (2016). The language background questionnaire in L2 research: Teasing apart the variables. Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistics Association, Calgary, Canada.Google Scholar
Schafer, E. W. P. (1985). Neural adaptability: A biological determinant of g factor intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8 (02), 240–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schnakers, C., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Giacino, J., Ventura, M., Boly, M., Majerus, S., Moonen, G., & Laureys, S. (2009). Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurology, 9 (1), 35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stough, C. K. K., Nettelbeck, T., & Cooper, C. J. (1990). Evoked brain potentials, string length and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 11 (4), 401–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 (6), 657–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wlotko, E. W., Lee, C.-L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2010). Language of the aging brain: Event-related potential studies of comprehension in older adults. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4 (8), 623–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Z., Yang, F., Li, D., Zhou, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Chen, X. (2017). Age-related reduction of adaptive brain response during semantic integration is associated with gray matter reduction. PLOS ONE, 12 (12), e0189462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Benraïss, A., & Besson, M. (1999). From print to meaning: An electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing word meaning. Psychophysiology, 36 (6), 775–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar