Cover not available
Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 18:3 (2023) ► pp.401–416

Bilingual and monolingual adults’ lexical choice in storytelling

Evidence for the weaker-links hypothesis?

ORCID logo | University of British Columbia
| University of Alberta
| University of Alberta
Bilinguals often have a harder time accessing words for production than monolinguals, perhaps because they have less exposure to words from each language (the weaker-links hypothesis). This research on lexical access mostly comes from studies of words in isolation. The purpose of the present study was to test whether bilinguals also show greater lexical access difficulties than monolinguals when telling a story. In the context of a narrative, we predicted that bilinguals would produce fewer different words and words of higher frequency than monolinguals, in order to make lexical access easier. For the same reason, we also predicted that bilinguals would use more cognates than monolinguals. English monolinguals, French monolinguals, and highly proficient French-English bilinguals watched a cartoon and told the story back. We coded the words they used for frequency and cognate status. In English, the results showed little difference between bilinguals and monolinguals on word frequency and cognate status. In French, first-language-English bilinguals used higher frequency words than first-language-French bilinguals. These results support predictions from the weaker-links hypothesis in lexical access for storytelling, albeit only for French.
Keywords: weaker-links hypothesis, lexical access, bilingualism
Article outline
  • This study
  • Method
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Coding
  • Results
    • Word frequency
    • Word frequency and vocabulary scores
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 1 February 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.21015.nic
References (48)
References
Aziz, J. R. & Nicoladis, E. (2019). “My French is rusty”: Proficiency and bilingual gesture use in a majority English community. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22 1, 826–835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, P., Nicoladis, E., & Keith, M. (2017). Bilingual children’s lexical strategies in a narrative task. Journal of Child Language, 44 1, 829–849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K. F., & Yang, S. (2010). Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 1, 525–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broersma, M., Carter, D., & Acheson, D. J. (2016). Cognate costs in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 1, 1461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M. & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequenc measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41 (4), 977–990. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cattani, A., Abbot-Smith, K., Farag, R., Krott, A., Arreckx, F., Dennis, I., & Floccia, C. (2014). How much exposure to English is necessary for a bilingual toddler to perform like a monolingual peer in language tests?. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49 (6), 649–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chuang, Y. Y., Bell, M. J., Banke, I., & Baayen, R. H. (2021). Bilingual and multilingual mental lexicon: a modeling study with Linear Discriminative Learning. Language Learning, 71 (S1), 219–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., La Heij, W., & Navarrete, E. (2006). The dynamics of bilingual lexical access. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 137–151.Google Scholar
Costa, A. & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50 1, 491–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Caño, A. (2005). On the facilitatory effects of cognate words in bilingual speech production. Brain and Language, 94 1, 94–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dell, G. S., Oppenheim, G. M., & Kittredge, A. K. (2008). Saying the right word at the right time: Syntagmatic and paradigmatic interference in sentence production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23 1, 583–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Third Edition. American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., & Thériault-Whalen, C. M. (1993). Échelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody: EVIP. Toronto: Psycan.Google Scholar
Dupuy, H. J. (1974). The rationale, development and standardization of a basic word vocabulary test. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (DHEW Publications No. HRA 74–1334). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L. & Hawkins, J. A. (2019). The Complex Adaptive System Principles model for bilingualism: Language interactions within and across bilingual minds. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23 1, 1223–1248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, M., Almeida, J., Janssen, N., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Lexical selection in bilingual speech production does not involve language suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32 1, 1075–1089.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58 (3), 787–814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140 1, 186–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graziano, M., Nicoladis, E., & Marentette, P. (2020). How referential gestures align with speech: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual speakers. Language Learning, 70 1, 266–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heitmeier, M., Chuang, Y. Y., Axen, S. D., & Baayen, R. H. (2023). Frequency effects in Linear Discriminative Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11044.Google Scholar
Ivanova, I. & Costa, A. (2008). Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production?. Acta Psychologica, 127 1, 277–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jescheniak, J. D. & Levelt, W. J. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20 1, 824–843.Google Scholar
Kastenbaum, J. G., Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Sheng, L., Mavis, I., Sebastian-Vaytadden, R., … & Kiran, S. (2019). The influence of proficiency and language combination on bilingual lexical access. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22 1, 300–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klaus, J., Lemhöfer, K., & Schriefers, H. (2018). The second language interferes with picture naming in the first language: Evidence for L2 activation during L1 production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33 1, 867–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kremmel, B. (2016). Word families and frequency bands in vocabulary tests: Challenging conventions. TESOL Quarterly, 50 (4), 976–987. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kremmel, B. & Schmitt, N. (2016). Interpreting vocabulary test scores: What do various item formats tell us about learners’ ability to employ words?. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13 1, 377–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kyle, K., Crossley, S., & Berger, C. (2018). The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): Version 2.0. Behavior Research Methods, 50 1, 1030–1046. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laurent, A. & Nicoladis, E. (2015). Gesture restriction affects French-English bilinguals’ speech only in French. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 1, 340–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laws, K. R. (2004). Sex differences in lexical size across semantic categories. Personality and Individual Differences, 36 (1), 23–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. W. & Williams, J. N. (2001). Lexical access in spoken word production by bilinguals: Evidence from the semantic competitor priming paradigm. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4 1, 233–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leśniewska, J., Pichette, F., & Béland, S. (2018). First language test bias? Comparing French-speaking and Polish-speaking participants’ performance on the Peabody picture vocabulary test. Canadian Modern Language Review, 74 (1), 27–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 1, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lund, K. & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28 1, 203–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMillan, C. T., Corley, M., & Lickley, R. J. (2009). Articulatory evidence for feedback and competition in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 1, 44–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (3), 516–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicoladis, E. (in press). Bilinguals’ lexical choice in storytelling: Testing the weaker-links hypothesis. In E. Babatsouli (Ed.), Multilingual acquisition and learning: Towards and eco-systemic view of diversity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Nicoladis, E. & Jiang, Z. (2018). Language and cognitive predictors of lexical selection in storytelling for monolingual and sequential bilingual children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19 1, 413–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicoladis, E. & Wiebe, S. A. (2020). How to use a wide variety of words in telling a story with a small vocabulary: cognitive predictors of lexical selection for simultaneous bilingual children. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35 1, 330–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, R. C. & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17 1, 273–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poulin-Dubois, D., Bialystok, E., Blaye, A., Polonia, A., & Yott, J. (2013). Lexical access and vocabulary development in very young bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17 1, 57–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64 1, 249–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Magnuson, J. S., Alario, F. X., & Costa, A. (2016). Breaking down the bilingual cost in speech production. Cognitive Science, 40 1, 1911–1940. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwieter, J. W. & Sunderman, G. (2008). Language switching in bilingual speech production: In search of the language-specific selection mechanism. The Mental Lexicon, 3 1, 214–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smithson, L. & Nicoladis, E. (2013). Verbal memory resources predict iconic gesture use among bilinguals and monolinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 1, 934–944. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, M. D., Poarch, G. J., & Bialystok, E. (2018). Why is lexical retrieval slower for bilinguals? Evidence from picture naming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21 1, 479–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G. B. (1987). Three studies of predicted gender differences in processes of word reading. The Journal of Educational Research, 80 (4), 212–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, E. (2015). The relationship between bilingual exposure and morphosyntactic development. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17 (2), 97–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yan, S. & Nicoladis, E. (2009). Finding le mot juste: Differences between bilingual and monolingual children’s lexical access in comprehension and production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12 1, 323–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar