Cover not available
Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 18:3 (2023) ► pp.446–471

Adult L2 learners’ morphological sensitivity in a morphosyllabic language

ORCID logo | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
| Shenzhen University
| Carnegie Mellon University
This study examined adult L2 learners’ morphological sensitivity in Chinese, a morphosyllabic language, and explored whether there is any modulating effects of L2 proficiency. Two word naming experiments (segment shifting and standard word naming) were administered to three participant groups, including native Chinese speakers, higher L2 Chinese proficiency learners, and lower L2 Chinese proficiency learners. In both experiments, reaction times (RTs) displayed only main effects of Chinese proficiency group and word type. This suggests that the morphological processing of L2 learners did not differ from that of native speakers, although the RTs of L2 learners were longer and exhibited more variability. Concerning error rates, both experiments showed that learners with higher and lower L2 proficiency had significantly higher error rates for words with unreliable morphological cues compared to those with reliable cues. Taken together, these findings indicate that L2 learners developed sensitivity to intraword morphological structure and employed decompositional strategies when reading Chinese words, irrespective of their L2 proficiency levels.
Keywords: morphological processing, Chinese, word naming, second language proficiency
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • Morphological decomposition in L2 word processing: Evidence from Chinese
  • The current study
  • General method
    • Participants
    • Method
  • Experiment 1: Segment shifting
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Data analysis
    • Results
  • Experiment 2: Standard word naming
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Data analysis
    • Results
  • Discussion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 10 June 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.22004.ke
References (48)
References
Arcodia, G. F. (2011). A Construction Morphology account of derivation in Mandarin Chinese. Morphology, 21 (1), 89–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L., Stowe, J. C., Maloof, C. J., Brovetto, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). The storage and composition of inflected forms in adultlearned second language: A study of the influence of length of residence, age of arrival, sex, and other factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15 1, 820840. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Fasiolo, M., Wood, S., & Chuang, Y. Y. (2022). A note on the modeling of the effects of experimental time in psycholinguistic experiments. The Mental Lexicon, 17 (2), 178–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, G. E. (2005). The grammar of words: an introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 5 (6), e10729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, T. (2018). The contribution of morphological awareness to lexical inferencing in L2 Chinese: Comparing more-skilled and less-skilled learners. Foreign Language Annals, 51 (4), 816–830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chinese Proficiency Test Center. (2011). Grading syllabus for Chinese vocabulary and Chinese characters (in Chinese). Beijing: Economy and Science Press.Google Scholar
Crepaldi, D., Che, W. C., Su, I. F., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Lexical-semantic variables affecting picture and word naming in Chinese: A mixed logit model study in aphasia. Behavioural Neurology, 25 (3), 165–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A. (2015). Morphological decomposition in native and non-native French speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (3), 524–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupé, C. (2018). Modeling linguistic variables with regression models: Addressing non-Gaussian distributions, non-independent observations, and non-linear predictors with random effects and generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 1, 307831. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. University of Hawaii Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deng, T., Shi, J., Dunlap, S., Bi, H., & Chen, B. (2016). Morphological knowledge affects processing of L2 derivational morphology: An event-related potential study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 37 1, 47–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64 (4), 344–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, D., Creemers, A., & Goodwin Davies, A. (2021). Morphology and the mental lexicon: Three questions about decomposition. In A. Papafragou, J. C. Trueswell, & L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Mental Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Frost, R., & Pnini, T. (1995). Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: Evidence from English and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21 (4), 947–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Basnight-Brown, D. M., Đurđević, D. F., & Pastizzo, M. J. (2010). Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 (02):119–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., & Prostko, B. (2002). Graded aspects of morphological processing: Task and processing time. Brain and Language, 81 (1–3), 12–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., & Kroll, J. F. (2019). Learning and using morphology and morphosyntax in a second language. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35 (5), 263–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gao, F., Wang, J., Wu, C., Wang, M. Y., Zhang, J., & Yuan, Z. (2022). The neural dynamics associated with lexicality effect in reading single Chinese words, pseudo-words and non-words. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 16(2), 471–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gor, K. (2017). The mental lexicon of L2 learners of Russian: Phonology and morphology in lexical storage and access. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 25 (2), 277–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ke, S. & Koda, K. (2017). Contributions of morphological awareness to adult L2 Chinese word meaning inferencing. The Modern Language Journal, 101 (4), 742–755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ke, S., & Koda, K. (2019). Is vocabulary knowledge sufficient for word-meaning inference? An investigation of the role of morphological awareness in adult L2 learners of Chinese. Applied Linguistics, 40 (3), 456–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2010). Not so fast: A discussion of L2 morpheme processing and acquisition. Language Learning, 60 (1), 221–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese (2008). Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese. Beijing: Commercial Presss.Google Scholar
Li, P., Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1993). Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(2), 169–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liang, L., & Chen, B. (2014). Processing morphologically complex words in second-language learners: The effect of proficiency. Acta Psychologica, 150 1, 69–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, & J. Williams (Eds.), Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 35–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maeng, J., & Kim, S-A. (2023). L2 processing of morphologically complex words in Chinese. Linguistic Research, 40 1, 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neubauer, K., & Clahsen, H. (2009). Decomposition of inflected words in a second language: An experimental study of German participles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31 (3), 403–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an” outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134 (4), 584–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Is the Science of Reading Just the Science of Reading English?. Reading Research Quarterly, 56 1, S391–S402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, H., & Ke, C. (2007). Radical awareness and word acquisition among nonnative learners of Chinese. The Modern Language Journal, 91 1, 97–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11 (2), 245–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Su, Y-F., & Samuels, S. J. (2010). Developmental changes in character-complexity and word- length effects when reading Chinese script. Reading and Writing, 23 1, 1085–1108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tian, S., & Baayen, H. R. (2022). Productivity and semantic transparency: An exploration of word formation in Mandarin Chinese. The Mental Lexicon, 17(3), 458–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tseng, Y. H., Hsieh, S. K., & Chen, P. Y. (2020, December). Computational modeling of affixoid behavior in Chinese morphology. In D. Scott, N. Bel & C. Zong (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 2879–2888). Barcelona: International Committee on Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uchihara, T., & Saito, K. (2019). Exploring the relationship between productive vocabulary knowledge and second language oral ability. The Language Learning Journal, 47 (1), 64–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainio, S., Pajunen, A., & Hyönä, J. (2014). L1 and L2 word recognition in Finnish: Examining L1 effects on L2 processing of morphological complexity and morphophonological transparency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(1), 133–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wade-Woolley, L., Geva, E. (1999). Processing inflected morphology in second language word recognition: Russian-speakers and English-speakers read Hebrew. Reading and Writing 11 1, 321–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Huang, L., & Guo, S. (2016). The overall design and quality analysis of the unified comprehensive Chinese examination of the preparatory education for international students in China [in Chinese]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 38 1, 53–58.Google Scholar
Wang, M., Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2004). The implicit and explicit learning of orthographic structure and function of a new writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8 1, 357–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., Chang, L.-Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2014). The effect of radical-based grouping in character learning in Chinese as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 98 1, 773–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, J. (2000). Orthographic effect on word recognition by learners of Chinese as a Foreign Language. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 35 1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Zeng, L. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative study of Chinese semi-affixes (in Chinese). Chinese Teaching in the World, 4 1, 75–87.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. (2017). Word reading in L1 and L2 learners of Chinese: Similarities and differences in the functioning of component processes. The Modern Language Journal, 101 (2), 391–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., & Koda, K. (2018). Word-knowledge development in Chinese as a heritage language learners: A comparative study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40 (1), 201–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, E. H., Lai, X. X., Li, D., Lei, V. L. C., Chen, Y., & Cao, H. W. (2021). Electrophysiological correlates of character transposition in two-character Chinese word identification. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 60 1, 101024. DOI logoGoogle Scholar