Article published In:
The Mental LexiconVol. 4:3 (2009) ► pp.380–429
Good and bad opposites
Using textual and experimental techniques to measure antonym canonicity
The goal of this paper is to combine corpus methodology with experimental methods to gain insights into the nature of antonymy as a lexico-semantic relation and the degree of antonymic canonicity of word pairs in language and in memory. Two approaches to antonymy in language are contrasted, the lexical categorical model and the cognitive prototype model. The results of the investigation support the latter model and show that different pairings have different levels of lexico-semantic affinity. At this general level of categorization, empirical methods converge; however, since they measure slightly different aspect of lexico-semantic opposability and affinity, and since the techniques of investigation are different in nature, we obtain slightly conflicting results at the more specific levels. We conclude that some antonym pairs can be diagnosed as “canonical” on the strength of three indicators: textual co-occurrence, individual judgement about “goodness” of opposition, and elicitation evidence.
Keywords: conventionalization, lexico-semantic relation, antonym, adjective, synonym, contrast, prototype, gradable
Cited by (44)
Cited by 44 other publications
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Matti Miestamo & Carl Börstell
2024. A cross-linguistic study of lexical and derived antonymy. Linguistics 
Bianchi, Ivana & Roberto Burro
2023. The Perception of Similarity, Difference and Opposition. Journal of Intelligence 11:9 ► pp. 172 ff.
Branchini, Erika, Roberto Burro & Ivana Bianchi
2023. Training People to Think in Opposites Facilitates the Falsification Process in Wason’s Rule Discovery Task. Journal of Intelligence 11:5 ► pp. 91 ff.
Caballero, Rosario & Carita Paradis
2023. Sharing Perceptual Experiences through Language. Journal of Intelligence 11:7 ► pp. 129 ff.
Hassanein, Hamada
2023. A tale of two tool(kit)s: from canonical antonymy to non-canonical opposition in the Qur’anic discourse. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59:3 ► pp. 577 ff.
Bianchi, Ivana, Hang Truong, Alex M. T. Russell & Roberto Burro
2022. Testing Australian standard consumers' understanding of the language used to describe wine. Journal of Sensory Studies 37:4
Giannouli, Vaitsa, Juliana Yordanova & Vasil Kolev
2022. The Primacy of Beauty in Music, Visual Arts and Literature: Not Just a Replication Study in the Greek Language Exploring the Effects of Verbal Fluency, Age and Gender. Psychological Reports 125:5 ► pp. 2636 ff.
Khafaga, Ayman
2022. Semiotic staging of the ideological point of view in Amiri Baraka’sSlave Ship: A social-semiotic approach. Cogent Arts & Humanities 9:1
Kozlov, Alexey & Maria Privizentseva
2022. Chapter 5. Typology of dimensions. In The Typology of Physical Qualities [Typological Studies in Language, 133], ► pp. 117 ff.
Bianchi, Ivana, Erika Branchini, Stefania Torquati, Arianna Fermani, Elena Capitani, Veronica Barnaba, Ugo Savardi & Roberto Burro
2021. Non experts’ understanding of terms frequently used by experts to describe the sensory properties of wine: An investigation based on opposites. Food Quality and Preference 92 ► pp. 104215 ff.
Branchini, Erika, Elena Capitani, Roberto Burro, Ugo Savardi & Ivana Bianchi
2021. Opposites in Reasoning Processes: Do We Use Them More Than We Think, but Less Than We Could?. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Erben Johansson, Niklas, Jon W Carr & Simon Kirby
2021. Cultural evolution leads to vocal iconicity in an experimental iterated learning task. Journal of Language Evolution 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Gladkova, Anna & Jesús Romero-Trillo
2021. Is ugliness in the mind of the beholder?. International Journal of Language and Culture 8:1 ► pp. 106 ff.
Hassanein, Hamada & Mohammad Mahzari
2021. A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 200 ff.
Kato, Sachi, Masayuki Asahara, Nanami Moriyama, Asami Ogiwara & Makoto Yamazaki
2021. Opposite Information Annotation on ‘Word List by Semantic Principles’. Journal of Natural Language Processing 28:1 ► pp. 60 ff.
Truong, Hang, Roberto Burro & Ivana Bianchi
2021. The sensorial experience of wine for nonexperts: How the terms frequently used in Italian guidebooks are understood by standard consumers in Vietnam. Journal of Sensory Studies 36:4
Capitani, Elena, Erika Branchini, Roberto Burro, Ugo Savardi & Ivana Bianchi
2020. The opposite of a transformation process. An exploration based on diagrams. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 32:7 ► pp. 698 ff.
Erben Johansson, Niklas, Andrey Anikin, Gerd Carling & Arthur Holmer
2020. The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features. Linguistic Typology 24:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
Schaeffer, Nora Cate & Jennifer Dykema
2020. Advances in the Science of Asking Questions. Annual Review of Sociology 46:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Canestrari, Carla & Ivana Bianchi
2018. Perceptual opposites and the modulation of contrast in irony. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 48 ff.
Schietecat, Anne C., Daniël Lakens, Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn, Yvonne A. W. de Kort, Nathan Van der Stoep & Rolf Zwaan
2018. Predicting Context-Dependent Cross-Modal Associations with Dimension-Specific Polarity Attributions Part 1 – Brightness and Aggression. Collabra: Psychology 4:1
Schietecat, Anne C., Daniël Lakens, Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn, Yvonne A. W. de Kort, Rolf Zwaan & Nathan Van der Stoep
2018. Predicting Context-dependent Cross-modal Associations with Dimension-specific Polarity Attributions. Part 2: Red and Valence. Collabra: Psychology 4:1
Bianchi, Ivana, Carita Paradis, Roberto Burro, Joost van de Weijer, Marcus Nyström & Ugo Savardi
2017. Identification of opposites and intermediates by eye and by hand. Acta Psychologica 180 ► pp. 175 ff.
Boholm, Max
2017. The semantic field of risk. Safety Science 92 ► pp. 205 ff.
Johansson, Niklas
2017. Tracking linguistic primitives. In Dimensions of Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 15],
Tzeng, Christina Y., Lynne C. Nygaard & Laura L. Namy
2017. The Specificity of Sound Symbolic Correspondences in Spoken Language. Cognitive Science 41:8 ► pp. 2191 ff.
Branchini, Erika, Ivana Bianchi, Roberto Burro, Elena Capitani & Ugo Savardi
2016. Can Contraries Prompt Intuition in Insight Problem Solving?. Frontiers in Psychology 7
Jones, Dean J. & Gunjan Mansingh
2016. 2016 International Conference on Data Science and Engineering (ICDSE), ► pp. 1 ff.
Lindley, Jori
2016. Literal versus exaggeratedalwaysandnever. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 219 ff.
Cacciari, Cristina, Francesca Pesciarelli, Tania Gamberoni, Fabio Ferlazzo, Leo Russo, Francesca Pedrazzi & Ermanno Melati
2015. Is Black Always the Opposite of White? An Investigation on the Comprehension of Antonyms in People with Schizophrenia and in Healthy Participants. Behavioral Sciences 5:1 ► pp. 93 ff.
Ding, Jing & Chu-Ren Huang
2015. Canonicity of Chinese Opposite Pairings. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9332], ► pp. 430 ff.
Giora, Rachel, Ari Drucker, Ofer Fein & Itamar Mendelson
2015. Default Sarcastic Interpretations: On the Priority of Nonsalient Interpretations. Discourse Processes 52:3 ► pp. 173 ff.
Ji-Ryong Lim
2015. Cognitive Semantic Properties of the Working of Opposites. Urimal null:40 ► pp. 65 ff.
Kostić, Nataša
2015. Antonym sequence in written discourse: a corpus-based study. Language Sciences 47 ► pp. 18 ff.
Spiridonov, Vladimir & Emilia Ezrina
2015. The Interaction of Several Languages in the Cognitive System. SSRN Electronic Journal
van de Weijer, Joost, Carita Paradis, Caroline Willners & Magnus Lindgren
2014. Antonym canonicity: Temporal and contextual manipulations. Brain and Language 128:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Giora, Rachel, Elad Livnat, Ofer Fein, Anat Barnea, Rakefet Zeiman & Iddo Berger
2013. Negation Generates Nonliteral Interpretations by Default. Metaphor and Symbol 28:2 ► pp. 89 ff.
Mohammad, Saif M., Bonnie J. Dorr, Graeme Hirst & Peter D. Turney
2013. Computing Lexical Contrast. Computational Linguistics 39:3 ► pp. 555 ff.
Tribushinina, Elena, Huub van den Bergh, Marianne Kilani-Schoch, Ayhan Aksu-Koç, Ineta Dabašinskienė, Gordana Hrzica, Katharina Korecky-Kröll, Sabrina Noccetti & Wolfgang Dressler
2013. The role of explicit contrast in adjective acquisition: A cross-linguistic longitudinal study of adjective production in spontaneous child speech and parental input. First Language 33:6 ► pp. 594 ff.
Paradis, Carita
2012. Cognitive Grammar. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Paradis, Carita
2012. Lexical Semantics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Paradis, Carita
2015. Conceptual Spaces at Work in Sensory Cognition: Domains, Dimensions and Distances. In Applications of Conceptual Spaces [Synthese Library, 359], ► pp. 33 ff.
Paradis, Carita
2023. Cognitive Grammar. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Tribushinina, Elena
2011. Once again on norms and comparison classes. Linguistics 49:3
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.