The paper explores how linguistic indices related to lexical networks and psycholinguistic models of lexical knowledge can be used to predict produced and not produced words in second language (L2) speakers. Two hypotheses are tested in this study. The first addresses how lexical properties thought to be important in word knowledge interrelate with word production. The second addresses which lexical properties are most predictive of word production. To test these hypotheses, a set of 45 frequent nouns and verbs produced by L2 learners were collected. A comparison word list of 45 frequent nouns and verbs produced by native speakers, but not found in the L2 data set were also collected. Polysemy and hypernymy values from the WordNet database along with word meaningfulness, concreteness, familiarity, and imagability values from the MRC Psycholinguistic Database and frequency values from SUBTLEXus were collected for each word. ANOVA analyses of variance and discriminant function analyses were conducted for each data set to examine which lexical indices discriminated between produced and not produced words and how these indices interrelated. The results of the noun analysis indicate that produced nouns are more frequent, more meaningful, and more familiar than not produced nouns. Results from the verb analysis show that produced verbs are more frequent, more meaningful, less specific, and more familiar than not produced verbs. These findings provide evidence for the importance of word properties in lexical production.
2023. To What Extent Do Learner‐ and Word‐Related Variables Affect Production of Derivatives?. Language Learning 73:1 ► pp. 301 ff.
Booton, Sophie A, Elizabeth Wonnacott, Alex Hodgkiss, Sandra Mathers & Victoria A Murphy
2022. Children’s Knowledge of Multiple Word Meanings: Which Factors Count and For Whom?. Applied Linguistics 43:2 ► pp. 293 ff.
ÇAKMAK, Ceren Taşatan & Ali MERÇ
2021. Turkish EFL learners’ lexical competence and performance. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi 17:2 ► pp. 946 ff.
De Wilde, Vanessa, Marc Brysbaert & June Eyckmans
2020. Learning English Through Out‐of‐School Exposure: How Do Word‐Related Variables and Proficiency Influence Receptive Vocabulary Learning?. Language Learning 70:2 ► pp. 349 ff.
Monteiro, Kátia R, Crossley, Scott A & Kyle, Kristopher
2020. In Search of New Benchmarks: Using L2 Lexical Frequency and Contextual Diversity Indices to Assess Second Language Writing. Applied Linguistics 41:2 ► pp. 280 ff.
Crossley, Scott A., Stephen Skalicky, Kristopher Kyle & Katia Monteiro
2019. ABSOLUTE FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEXICAL ACQUISITION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:04 ► pp. 721 ff.
Crossley, Scott A., Tom Cobb & Danielle S. McNamara
2013. Comparing count-based and band-based indices of word frequency: Implications for active vocabulary research and pedagogical applications. System 41:4 ► pp. 965 ff.
Crossley, Scott A., Nicholas Subtirelu & Tom Salsbury
2013. FREQUENCY EFFECTS OR CONTEXT EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE WORD LEARNING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35:4 ► pp. 727 ff.
KÖSE, Gül DURMUŞOĞLU & İlknur YUKSEL
2013. ELT Majors' Cross Sectional Evaluation of Academic Lexical Competence and Performance. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 4:2
Crossley, Scott A., Tom Salsbury & Danielle S. McNamara
2012. Predicting the proficiency level of language learners using lexical indices. Language Testing 29:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
CROSSLEY, SCOTT A., TOM SALSBURY, DANIELLE S. McNAMARA & SCOTT JARVIS
2011. What Is Lexical Proficiency? Some Answers From Computational Models of Speech Data. TESOL Quarterly 45:1 ► pp. 182 ff.
Crossley, Scott A., Tom Salsbury, Danielle S. McNamara & Scott Jarvis
2011. Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices. Language Testing 28:4 ► pp. 561 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.