Disasters, devastation and polysemy
Jean Aitchison | Emeritus Professor of Language and Communication, University of Oxford
This paper explores meaning change, especially how listeners and readers handle polysemy, a topic which has come to the forefront of attention in recent years. It discusses in particular words for catastrophic events, which perhaps because of their dramatic content, seem to be prone to polysemy. The paper will look first at word class differences associated with the lexical item devastate, and will consider how their meanings differ. It will then evaluate the various meanings of the word disaster, looking particularly at clues which enable readers to distinguish the different senses. Finally, it looks at the newspaper language used to report an event which was widely labeled a disaster, the so-called 9/11 disaster, and considers journalists’ descriptions of the event.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Crow, Deserai Anderson & Olga Baysha
2013.
“Conservation” as a Catalyst for Conflict: Considering Stakeholder Understanding in Policy Making.
Review of Policy Research 30:3
► pp. 302 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.