References
Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F. (
2006) Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science , 171, 814-823. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besner, D., & Joordens, S. (
1995) Wrestling with ambiguity—Further reflections: Reply to Masson and Borowsky (1995) and Rueckl (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 211, 515-519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T., & Medler, D. A. (
2005) Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 171, 905-917. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bleasdale, F. A. (
1987) Concreteness-dependent associative priming: Separate lexical organization for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition , 131, 582-594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J. D., & McCarrell, N. S. (
1974) A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension. In W. Weimer & D. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes (pp. 189-229). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brown, W. P., & Ure, D. M. J. (
1969) Five rated characteristics of. 650 word association stimuli. British Journal of Psychology , 601, 233-249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colangelo, A., Buchanan, L., & Westbury, C. (
2004) Deep dyslexia and semantic errors: A test of the failure of inhibition hypothesis using a semantic blocking paradigm. Brain and Cognition , 541, 232-234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colangelo, A., & Buchanan, L. (
2005) Semantic ambiguity and the failure of inhibition hypothesis as an explanation for reading errors in deep dyslexia. Brain & Cognition , 57(1), 39-42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (
2005) Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain , 1281, 615-627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crutch, S. J., Ridha, B. H., & Warrington, E. K. (
2006) The different frameworks underlying abstract and concrete knowledge: Evidence from a bilingual patient with a semantic refractory access dysphasia. Neurocase , 121, 151-163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (
2005) BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods , 371, 665-671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S., Furnas, G., Landauer, T., & Harshman, R. (
1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 411, 391-407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeGroot, A. M. B. (
1989) Representational aspects of Word imageability and Word frequency as assessed through Word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 151, 824-845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (
1988) Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language , 271, 429-446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A., Avilés, A., Afonso, O., Scheepers, C., & Carreiras, M. (
2009) Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm. Cognition , 1101, 284-292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estévez, A. (
1991) Estudio normativo sobre ambigüedad en castellano. Cognitiva , 31, 237-271.Google Scholar
Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (
1996) Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 221, 1331-1356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (
2002) Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition , 281, 686-713. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. R., & Bryden, M. P. (
1987). The effects of word orientation and imageability on visual half-field presentations with a lexical decision task. Neuropsychologia , 251, 527-538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huettig, F., Quinlan, P., McDonald, S., & Altmann, G. T. (
2006) Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict language-mediated eye movements in the visual world. Acta Psychologica , 1211, 65-80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joordens, S., & Besner, D. (
1994). When banking on meaning is not (yet) money in the bank: Explorations in connectionist modeling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 201, 1051-1062. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jorge-Botana, G., León, J. A., Olmos, R., & Hassan-Montero, Y. (
2010). Visualizing polysemy using LSA and the predication algorithm. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 61(8), 1706-1724.Google Scholar
Jorge-Botana, G., Olmos, R., & Barroso, A. (
2012) The construction-integration framework: A means to disminish bias in LSA-based call routing. International Journal of Speech Technology , 15(2), 151-164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012). Gallito (Version 2.0.1) [NLP Software]. Retrieved from: [URL]
Jorge-Botana, G., Olmos, R., & Barroso, A.
Gallito 2.0: A natural language processing tool to support research on discourse. In Proceedings of the twenty-third Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Valencia from 16 to 18 July 2013.
Kilgarriff, A. (
1997) I don't believe in word senses. Computers and the Humanities , 31(2), 91-113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (
1998) The representation of knowledge in minds as machines. International Journal of Psychology , 33(6), 411-420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W., Patel, V. L., & Ericsson, K. A.. (
1999) The role of long term working memory in text comprehension. Psychologia , 421, 186-198.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (
2000) Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psyhonomic Bulletin and Review , 71, 257-266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001) Predication. Cognitive Science , 251, 173-202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Bowles, A. (
2002) Metaphor comprehension: What makes a metaphor difficult to understand?. Metaphor and Symbol , 171, 249-262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (
2008) Symbol systems and perceptual representations. In M. de Vega, A. M. Glenberg & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition (pp. 145-164). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Mangalath, P. (
2011). The construction of meaning. Topics in Cognitive Science , 31, 346-370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L. (
2001) The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language , 451, 259-282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (
1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review , 1041, 211-240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (
2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition , 1141, 96-104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M. M. (
2011) Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science , 31, 273-302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M. M., & Zwaan, R. A. (
2009). Language encodes geographical information. Cognitive Science , 331, 51-73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M., & Hutchinson, S. (
2012) Neurological evidence linguistic processes precedeperceptual simulation in conceptual processing. Frontiers in Psychology , 31, 1-11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, S., & Shillcock, R. (
2001). Rethinking the word frequency effect: The neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing. Language and Speech , 441, 295-323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mirman, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (
2008). Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: Processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 34(1), 65-79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millis, K., & Larson, M. (
2008) Applying the construction-integration framework to aesthetic responses to representational artworks. Discourse Process , 451, 263-287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakov, P., Popova, A., & Mateev, P. (
2001) Weight functions impact on LSA performance. In Euro Conference RANLP’2001 (Recent Advances in NLP) , Tzigov Chark, Bulgaria (pp. 187-193).
Paivio, A. (
1986)  Mental representations . New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1991)  Images in mind: The evolution of a theory . New York: Harvester-Wheasheaf.Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M., & Lupker, S. J. (
1999) The impact of semantic ambiguity on visual word recognition: Do homophone and polysemy effects co-occur? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology , 531, 323-334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (
2004). Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 301, 1252-1270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., Edwards, J. D., Henry, L. C., & Goodyear, B. G. (
2007). Neural correlates of concreteness in semantic categorization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 191, 1407-1419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piercey, C. D., & Joordens, S. (
2000) Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks. Memory & Cognition , 281, 657-666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riordan, B., & Jones, M. N. (
2011) Redundancy in perceptual and linguistic experience: Comparing feature-based and distributional models of semantic representation. Topics in Cognitive Science , 31, 303-345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (
2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language , 461, 245-266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samson, D., & Pillon, A. (
2003). Concreteness effects in lexical tasks: Access to a mental image? Brain and Language , 871, 25-26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (
1998) Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language , 271, 499-520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (
1983) Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychololgy, Learning and Memory and Cognition , 91, 82-102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Stowe, R. W. (
1989) Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words. Reading Research Quartely , 241, 114-126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Akin, C. E. (
1994) Developmental trends in lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Reading Research Quarterly , 291, 251-263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebastián, N., Martí, M. A., Carreiras, M. F., & Cuetos, F. (
2000)  LEXESP, léxico informatizado del Español . Barcelona: Ediciones de la Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. (
1987) Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science , 2371, 1317-1323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wandmacher, T.
2005How semantic is latent semantic analysis? In Proceedings of RECITAL'05 , Dourdan, France.
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Jorge-Botana, Guillermo, Ricardo Olmos & Vicente Sanjosé
2017. Predicting Word Maturity from Frequency and Semantic Diversity: A Computational Study. Discourse Processes 54:8  pp. 682 ff. DOI logo
Martínez-Mingo, Alejandro, Guillermo Jorge-Botana, José Ángel Martinez-Huertas & Ricardo Olmos Albacete
2023. Quantum projections on conceptual subspaces. Cognitive Systems Research 82  pp. 101154 ff. DOI logo
Martínez‐Huertas, José Á., Guillermo Jorge‐Botana & Ricardo Olmos
2021. Emotional Valence Precedes Semantic Maturation of Words: A Longitudinal Computational Study of Early Verbal Emotional Anchoring. Cognitive Science 45:7 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.