Article published in:
Bridging the Methodological Divide: Linguistic and psycholinguistic approaches to formulaic language
Edited by Stefanie Wulff and Debra Titone
[The Mental Lexicon 9:3] 2014
► pp. 419436
References

References

Altmann, G., & Steedman, M.
(1988) Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Christiansen, M.H.
in preparation). Building blocks of language learning.
Arnon, I., & Clark, E.
(2011) Why brush your teeth is better than teeth: Children’s word production is facilitated by familiar frames. Language Learning and Development, 7, 107–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Cohen Priva, U.
(2013) More than words: The effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration. Language and Speech, 56, 349–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Ramscar, M.
(2012) Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: How order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned. Cognition, 122, 292–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Snider, N.
(2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multiword phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D.
(2008) Stored word sequences in language learning. Psychological Science, 19, 241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borovsky, A., Elman, J.L., & Fernald, A.
(2012) Knowing a lot for one’s age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112, 417–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(2008) Automatic evaluation of syntactic learners in typologically-different languages. Cognitive Systems Research, 9, 198–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1957) Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. 
Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N.D.
(2007) The “good enough” approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frank, S.L., & Bod, R.
(2011) Insensitivity of the human sentence-processing system to hierarchical structure. Psychological Science, 22, 829. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, N., & Barber, H.A.
(2012) Phrase frequency effects in language production. PloS one, 7, e33202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jolsvai, H., McCauley, S.M., & Christiansen, M.H.
(2013) Meaning overrides frequency in idiomatic and compositional multiword chunks. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1987) The foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(2000) The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk, volume II: The database. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Manning, C. & Scütze, H.
(1999) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. 
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maslen, R.J., Theakston, A.L., Lieven, E.V., & Tomasello, M.
(2004) A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, S.M. & Christiansen, M.H.
in preparation). Language learning as language use: A computational model of children’s language comprehension and production.
(2011) Learning simple statistics for language comprehension and production: The CAPPUCCINO model. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher & 
T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1619–1624). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
McCauley, S.M , & Christiansen, M.H.
(2013) Toward a unified account of comprehension and production in language development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 366–367 (commentary on Pickering & Garrod). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, S.M. & Christiansen, M.H.
(2014) Prospects for usage-based computational models of grammatical development: Argument structure and semantic roles. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5, 489–499. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, S.M., Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M.H.
in press). Language emergence in development: A computational perspective. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.) The handbook of language emergence Hoboken, NJ Wiley-Blackwell Crossref
Pelucchi, B., Hay, J.F., & Saffran, J.R.
(2009) Learning in reverse: Eight-month-old infants track backward transitional probabilities. Cognition, 113, 244–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perruchet, P., & Desaulty, S.
(2008) A role for backward transitional probabilities in word segmentation? Memory and Cognition, 36, 1299–1305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A.
(1998) PARSER: A model for word segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 246–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Punyakanok, V., & Roth, D.
(2001) The use of classifiers in sequential inference. In Proceedings of NIPS 2001 (pp. 995–1001).
Pickering, M.J., & Garrod, S.
(2013) An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & McCauley, S.M.
(2013) Expectation and error distribution in learning: The curious absence of “mouses” in adult speech. Language, 89, 760–793. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramscar, M., & Yarlett, D.
(2007) Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 31, 927–960. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M.H.
(2007) Word-chunk frequencies affect the processing of pronominal object-relative clauses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 161–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A.J., & Sturt, P.
(2002) Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 382–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, US: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., & Baayen, R.H.
(2010) Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 151–173). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
(2011) Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61, 569–613. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A.
(1999) Formulaic language in learners and native speakers. Language Teaching, 32, 213–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 51 other publications

No author info given
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 9 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 38 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 66 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 153 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 206 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 220 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 224 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 239 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 264 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. xiii ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 9 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 43 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 63 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 90 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 142 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 172 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 281 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In The Grammar Network,  pp. 286 ff. Crossref logo
Cassani, Giovanni, Robert Grimm, Walter Daelemans, Steven Gillis & Eva María Rosa Martínez
2018. Lexical category acquisition is facilitated by uncertainty in distributional co-occurrences. PLOS ONE 13:12  pp. e0209449 ff. Crossref logo
Christiansen, Morten H.
2019. Implicit Statistical Learning: A Tale of Two Literatures. Topics in Cognitive Science 11:3  pp. 468 ff. Crossref logo
Diessel, Holger
2019.  In The Grammar Network, Crossref logo
Gambi, Chiara, Fiona Gorrie, Martin J. Pickering & Hugh Rabagliati
2018. The development of linguistic prediction: Predictions of sound and meaning in 2- to 5-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 173  pp. 351 ff. Crossref logo
Green, Kieran & John W. Schwieter
2018. Using more native-like language acquisition processes in the foreign language classroom. Cogent Education 5:1  pp. 1429134 ff. Crossref logo
Grimm, Robert, Giovanni Cassani, Steven Gillis & Walter Daelemans
2017. Facilitatory Effects of Multi-Word Units in Lexical Processing and Word Learning: A Computational Investigation. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
Grimm, Robert, Giovanni Cassani, Steven Gillis & Walter Daelemans
2019. Children Probably Store Short Rather Than Frequent or Predictable Chunks: Quantitative Evidence From a Corpus Study. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Isbilen, Erin S. & Morten H. Christiansen
2020. Chunk‐Based Memory Constraints on the Cultural Evolution of Language. Topics in Cognitive Science 12:2  pp. 713 ff. Crossref logo
Isbilen, Erin S., Morten H. Christiansen & Nick Chater
2019. It's about time: Adding processing to neuroemergentism. Journal of Neurolinguistics 49  pp. 224 ff. Crossref logo
Isbilen, Erin S., Stewart M. McCauley, Evan Kidd & Morten H. Christiansen
2020. Statistically Induced Chunking Recall: A Memory‐Based Approach to Statistical Learning. Cognitive Science 44:7 Crossref logo
Jach, Daniel
2021.  In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30],  pp. 340 ff. Crossref logo
McCauley, Stewart M.
2020. Towards an integrated, single-system account of language development as skill learning. Journal of Communication Disorders 83  pp. 105942 ff. Crossref logo
Montgomery, James W., Julia L. Evans, Jamison D. Fargo, Sarah Schwartz & Ronald B. Gillam
2018. Structural Relationship Between Cognitive Processing and Syntactic Sentence Comprehension in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 61:12  pp. 2950 ff. Crossref logo
Montgomery, James W., Ronald B. Gillam & Julia L. Evans
2021. A New Memory Perspective on the Sentence Comprehension Deficits of School-Age Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Implications for Theory, Assessment, and Intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 52:2  pp. 449 ff. Crossref logo
Oakey, David
2020. Phrases in EAP academic writing pedagogy: Illuminating Halliday’s influence on research and practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 44  pp. 100829 ff. Crossref logo
Perruchet, Pierre
2019. What Mechanisms Underlie Implicit Statistical Learning? Transitional Probabilities Versus Chunks in Language Learning. Topics in Cognitive Science 11:3  pp. 520 ff. Crossref logo
Peter, Michelle S. & Caroline F. Rowland
2019. Aligning Developmental and Processing Accounts of Implicit and Statistical Learning. Topics in Cognitive Science 11:3  pp. 555 ff. Crossref logo
Poletiek, Fenna H., Christopher M. Conway, Michelle R. Ellefson, Jun Lai, Bruno R. Bocanegra & Morten H. Christiansen
2018. Under What Conditions Can Recursion Be Learned? Effects of Starting Small in Artificial Grammar Learning of Center‐Embedded Structure. Cognitive Science 42:8  pp. 2855 ff. Crossref logo
Roete, Ingeborg, Stefan L. Frank, Paula Fikkert & Marisa Casillas
2020. Modeling the Influence of Language Input Statistics on Children's Speech Production. Cognitive Science 44:12 Crossref logo
Schwering, Steven C. & Maryellen C. MacDonald
2020. Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14 Crossref logo
Uzun, Kutay
2018. The use of lexical bundles and the definite article ‘the’: A core expression analysis. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education 7:3  pp. 269 ff. Crossref logo
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner, Crossref logo
Yaiche, Sameh, Isabelle Maillochon & Dominique Bassano
2020. L’émergence du figement dans la production langagière précoce. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 11:2  pp. 196 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.