Article published In:
Bridging the Methodological Divide: Linguistic and psycholinguistic approaches to formulaic language
Edited by Stefanie Wulff and Debra Titone
[The Mental Lexicon 9:3] 2014
► pp. 419436
References
Altmann, G., & Steedman, M
(1988) Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 301, 191–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Christiansen, M.H
in preparation). Building blocks of language learning.
Arnon, I., & Clark, E
(2011) Why brush your teeth is better than teeth: Children’s word production is facilitated by familiar frames. Language Learning and Development, 71, 107–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Cohen Priva, U
(2013) More than words: The effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration. Language and Speech, 561, 349–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Ramscar, M
(2012) Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: How order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned. Cognition, 1221, 292–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Snider, N
(2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multiword phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 621, 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D
(2008) Stored word sequences in language learning. Psychological Science, 191, 241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borovsky, A., Elman, J.L., & Fernald, A
(2012) Knowing a lot for one’s age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1121, 417–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M
(2008) Automatic evaluation of syntactic learners in typologically-different languages. Cognitive Systems Research, 91, 198–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1957) Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W
(2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. 
Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N.D
(2007) The “good enough” approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 11, 71–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank, S.L., & Bod, R
(2011) Insensitivity of the human sentence-processing system to hierarchical structure. Psychological Science, 221, 829. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janssen, N., & Barber, H.A
(2012) Phrase frequency effects in language production. PloS one, 71, e33202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jolsvai, H., McCauley, S.M., & Christiansen, M.H
(2013) Meaning overrides frequency in idiomatic and compositional multiword chunks. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Langacker, R
(1987) The foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 11). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B
(2000) The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk, volume II: The database. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Manning, C. & Scütze, H
(1999) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. 
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maslen, R.J., Theakston, A.L., Lieven, E.V., & Tomasello, M
(2004) A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 471, 1319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCauley, S.M. & Christiansen, M.H
in preparation). Language learning as language use: A computational model of children’s language comprehension and production.
(2011) Learning simple statistics for language comprehension and production: The CAPPUCCINO model. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher & 
T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1619–1624). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
McCauley, S.M , & Christiansen, M.H
(2013) Toward a unified account of comprehension and production in language development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 361, 366–367 (commentary on Pickering & Garrod). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCauley, S.M. & Christiansen, M.H
(2014) Prospects for usage-based computational models of grammatical development: Argument structure and semantic roles. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 51, 489–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCauley, S.M., Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M.H
in press). Language emergence in development: A computational perspective. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.) The handbook of language emergence Hoboken, NJ Wiley-Blackwell DOI logo
Pelucchi, B., Hay, J.F., & Saffran, J.R
(2009) Learning in reverse: Eight-month-old infants track backward transitional probabilities. Cognition, 1131, 244–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perruchet, P., & Desaulty, S
(2008) A role for backward transitional probabilities in word segmentation? Memory and Cognition, 361, 1299–1305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A
(1998) PARSER: A model for word segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 391, 246–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Punyakanok, V., & Roth, D
(2001) The use of classifiers in sequential inference. In Proceedings of NIPS 2001 (pp. 995–1001).
Pickering, M.J., & Garrod, S
(2013) An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 361, 329–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & McCauley, S.M
(2013) Expectation and error distribution in learning: The curious absence of “mouses” in adult speech. Language, 891, 760–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramscar, M., & Yarlett, D
(2007) Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 311, 927–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M.H
(2007) Word-chunk frequencies affect the processing of pronominal object-relative clauses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 601, 161–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A.J., & Sturt, P
(2002) Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 61, 382–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, US: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., & Baayen, R.H
(2010) Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 151–173). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C
(2011) Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 611, 569–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, A
(1999) Formulaic language in learners and native speakers. Language Teaching, 321, 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 66 other publications

Arnon, Inbal & Morten H. Christiansen
2017. The Role of Multiword Building Blocks in Explaining L1–L2 Differences. Topics in Cognitive Science 9:3  pp. 621 ff. DOI logo
Arnon, Inbal, Stewart M. McCauley & Morten H. Christiansen
2017. Digging up the building blocks of language: Age-of-acquisition effects for multiword phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 92  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Cassani, Giovanni, Robert Grimm, Walter Daelemans, Steven Gillis & Eva María Rosa Martínez
2018. Lexical category acquisition is facilitated by uncertainty in distributional co-occurrences. PLOS ONE 13:12  pp. e0209449 ff. DOI logo
Chater, Nick & Morten H. Christiansen
2016. Squeezing through the Now-or-Never bottleneck: Reconnecting language processing, acquisition, change, and structure. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39 DOI logo
Christiansen, Morten H.
2019. Implicit Statistical Learning: A Tale of Two Literatures. Topics in Cognitive Science 11:3  pp. 468 ff. DOI logo
Contreras Kallens, Pablo & Morten H. Christiansen
2022. Models of Language and Multiword Expressions. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 5 DOI logo
Diessel, Holger
2019. The Grammar Network, DOI logo
Gambi, Chiara, Fiona Gorrie, Martin J. Pickering & Hugh Rabagliati
2018. The development of linguistic prediction: Predictions of sound and meaning in 2- to 5-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 173  pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Green, Kieran & John W. Schwieter
2018. Using more native-like language acquisition processes in the foreign language classroom. Cogent Education 5:1  pp. 1429134 ff. DOI logo
Grimm, Robert, Giovanni Cassani, Steven Gillis & Walter Daelemans
2017. Facilitatory Effects of Multi-Word Units in Lexical Processing and Word Learning: A Computational Investigation. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo
Grimm, Robert, Giovanni Cassani, Steven Gillis & Walter Daelemans
2019. Children Probably Store Short Rather Than Frequent or Predictable Chunks: Quantitative Evidence From a Corpus Study. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
HAVRON, NAOMI & INBAL ARNON
2017. Minding the gaps: literacy enhances lexical segmentation in children learning to read. Journal of Child Language 44:6  pp. 1516 ff. DOI logo
Isbilen, Erin S. & Morten H. Christiansen
2020. Chunk‐Based Memory Constraints on the Cultural Evolution of Language. Topics in Cognitive Science 12:2  pp. 713 ff. DOI logo
Isbilen, Erin S., Morten H. Christiansen & Nick Chater
2019. It's about time: Adding processing to neuroemergentism. Journal of Neurolinguistics 49  pp. 224 ff. DOI logo
Isbilen, Erin S., Stewart M. McCauley, Evan Kidd & Morten H. Christiansen
2020. Statistically Induced Chunking Recall: A Memory‐Based Approach to Statistical Learning. Cognitive Science 44:7 DOI logo
Jach, Daniel
2021. Something I was dealing with. In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30],  pp. 340 ff. DOI logo
Koch, Nikolas, Stefan Hartmann & Antje Endesfelder Quick
2022. Traceback and Chunk-Based Learning: Comparing Usage-Based Computational Approaches to Child Code-Mixing. Languages 7:4  pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
LIEVEN, ELENA
2016. Usage-based approaches to language development: Where do we go from here?. Language and Cognition 8:3  pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
McCauley, Stewart M.
2020. Towards an integrated, single-system account of language development as skill learning. Journal of Communication Disorders 83  pp. 105942 ff. DOI logo
McCauley, Stewart M. & Morten H. Christiansen
2017. Computational Investigations of Multiword Chunks in Language Learning. Topics in Cognitive Science 9:3  pp. 637 ff. DOI logo
Montgomery, James W., Julia L. Evans, Jamison D. Fargo, Sarah Schwartz & Ronald B. Gillam
2018. Structural Relationship Between Cognitive Processing and Syntactic Sentence Comprehension in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 61:12  pp. 2950 ff. DOI logo
Montgomery, James W., Ronald B. Gillam & Julia L. Evans
2021. A New Memory Perspective on the Sentence Comprehension Deficits of School-Age Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Implications for Theory, Assessment, and Intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 52:2  pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
Montgomery, James W., Ronald B. Gillam & Elena Plante
2024. Enhancing Syntactic Knowledge in School-Age Children With Developmental Language Disorder: The Promise of Syntactic Priming. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 33:2  pp. 580 ff. DOI logo
Oakey, David
2020. Phrases in EAP academic writing pedagogy: Illuminating Halliday’s influence on research and practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 44  pp. 100829 ff. DOI logo
Perruchet, Pierre
2019. What Mechanisms Underlie Implicit Statistical Learning? Transitional Probabilities Versus Chunks in Language Learning. Topics in Cognitive Science 11:3  pp. 520 ff. DOI logo
Peter, Michelle S. & Caroline F. Rowland
2019. Aligning Developmental and Processing Accounts of Implicit and Statistical Learning. Topics in Cognitive Science 11:3  pp. 555 ff. DOI logo
Poletiek, Fenna H., Christopher M. Conway, Michelle R. Ellefson, Jun Lai, Bruno R. Bocanegra & Morten H. Christiansen
2018. Under What Conditions Can Recursion Be Learned? Effects of Starting Small in Artificial Grammar Learning of Center‐Embedded Structure. Cognitive Science 42:8  pp. 2855 ff. DOI logo
Roete, Ingeborg, Stefan L. Frank, Paula Fikkert & Marisa Casillas
2020. Modeling the Influence of Language Input Statistics on Children's Speech Production. Cognitive Science 44:12 DOI logo
Schmid, Samuel, Douglas Saddy & Julie Franck
2023. Finding Hierarchical Structure in Binary Sequences: Evidence from Lindenmayer Grammar Learning. Cognitive Science 47:1 DOI logo
Schwering, Steven C. & Maryellen C. MacDonald
2020. Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14 DOI logo
Senoussi, Mehdi, Pieter Verbeke & Tom Verguts
2022. Time-Based Binding as a Solution to and a Limitation for Flexible Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Theakston, Anna & Elena Lieven
2017. Multiunit Sequences in First Language Acquisition. Topics in Cognitive Science 9:3  pp. 588 ff. DOI logo
Uzun, Kutay
2018. The use of lexical bundles and the definite article ‘the’: A core expression analysis. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education 7:3  pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana
2019. Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner, DOI logo
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana, Alena Konina, Nitin Williams, Nina Mikušová & Anna Mauranen
2022. Perceptual chunking of spontaneous speech: Validating a new method with non-native listeners. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1:2  pp. 100012 ff. DOI logo
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana, Alena Konina, Nitin Williams, Nina Mikušová & Anna Mauranen
2023. Chunking up speech in real time: linguistic predictors and cognitive constraints. Language and Cognition 15:3  pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
Yaiche, Sameh, Isabelle Maillochon & Dominique Bassano
2020. L’émergence du figement dans la production langagière précoce. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 11:2  pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Grammar as a Network. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Meaning-Shift Units in L2 Processing: Usage vs. Word Association Responses. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Subject Index. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 286 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Construction Families. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Sequential Relations. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Meaning-Based Responses Are ‘Harder’ to Give. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. References. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. A Sample Word Association Task. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Preface. In The Grammar Network,  pp. xiii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. A Dynamic Network Model of Parts of Speech. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Cognitive Processes and Language Use. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Encoding Asymmetries of Grammatical Categories. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. L2 Use and Processing of Multi-Word Units. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Introduction. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Symbolic Relations. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Towards the Bigger Picture. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Author Index. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Introduction. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Index. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 264 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Triangulating Usage, Exposure and Processing. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Phrase Structure. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 172 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. The Taxonomic Network. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. References. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Conclusion. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. From a Unit of Meaning to a Meaning-Shift Unit. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Usage Concgrams Compared to Exposure Corpus. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 224 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Argument Structure and Linguistic Productivity. In The Grammar Network,  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Meaning-Shift Units in L2 Learning and Use: Usage vs. Exposure. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.