Zooming in on the notion of metaphoricity
Notions, dimensions, and operationalizations
The present contribution addresses the notion of metaphoricity and discusses different positions in relation to this complex and multi-dimensional phenomenon. Generally, the notion of metaphoricity is used when metaphor is not considered a binary category anymore, or when the status of an expression as metaphorical is at stake (e.g. in discussions of metaphor identification). We will focus on the first understanding of metaphoricity as a scalar phenomenon. Despite the fact that the term is used more and more in the metaphor literature, it is often unclear what it actually entails, e.g. how metaphor is gradable. To shed light on this theoretical and methodological problem, in this paper we will discuss different notions of the term metaphoricity by illustrating how metaphoricity is understood and how it can be operationalized and studied.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Notions of metaphoricity
- 3.Dimensions of metaphoricity
- 3.1Semantic similarity between domains involved in a metaphorical mapping
- 3.2Conventionality
- 3.3Noticeability and imaginability
- 3.4Metaphoricity as a matter of use
- 3.5Deliberateness
- 3.6Ecology
- 3.7Metaphorical to whom?
- 4.Conclusion and perspectives for further research
- Notes
-
References
References (41)
References
Beger, A. (2019). The contested notion of ‘deliberate metaphor’: What can we learn from ‘unclear’ cases in academic lectures? Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association,
7
(1), 51–66. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bortfeld, H., & McGlone, M. S. (2001). The Continuum of Metaphor Processing. Metaphor and Symbol,
16
(1 & 2), 75–86. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods,
46
1, 904–911. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caballero, R., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). Ways of perceiving, moving, and thinking: Revindicating culture in conceptual metaphor research. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics,
5
(1–2), 268–290. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. Bloomsbury Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor analysis. Research practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cox, A. (2016). Music and Embodied Cognition. Listening, Moving, Feeling, and Thinking. Indiana University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dirven, R. (2003). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (2nd ed., pp. 75–111). Mouton De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, Jr., R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, Jr., R. W. (2015). Counting Metaphors: What Does this Reveal about Language and Thought? Cognitive Semantics,
1
(2), 155–177. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, Jr., R. W. Jr. (2017). Metaphor Wars. Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goatly, A. (2011[1997]). The Language of Metaphors (2nd ed.). Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grady, J. E., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In G. J. Steen & R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 101–124). John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hampe, B. (2017). Embodiment and Discourse: Dimensions and Dynamics of Contemporary Metaphor Theory. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor. Embodied Cognition and Discourse. (pp. 3–23). Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanks, P. (2006). Metaphoricity is gradable. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (pp. 17–35). Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jensen, T. W. (2017). Doing Metaphor: An Ecological Perspective on Metaphoricity in Discourse. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse (pp. 257–276). Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jensen, T. W., & Cuffari, E. (2014). Doubleness in Experience: Toward a Distributed Enactive Approach to Metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol,
29
(4), 278–297. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jensen, T. W., & Greve, L. (2019). Ecological cognition and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol,
34
(1), 1–16. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. The University Of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking. A Dynamic View. The University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, C., & Tag, S. (2010). The Dynamics of Metaphor: Foregrounding and Activating Metaphoricity in Conversational Interaction. Cognitive Semiotics,
10
(6), 85–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nacey, S., Krennmayr, T., Dorst, A. G., & Reijnierse, W. G. (2019). What the MIPVU protocol doesn’t tell you (even though it mostly does). In S. Nacey, A. G. Dorst, T. Krennmayr, & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages. MIPVU around the world (Vol. 221, pp. 41–67). John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol,
22
(1), 1–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reijnierse, W. G.; Burgers, C. F.; Krennmayr, T.; Steen, G. J. (2018). DMIP: A Method for Identifying Potentially Deliberate Metaphor in Language Use. Corpus Pragmatics,
2
1, 129–147. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Bolognesi, M., & Krennmayr, T. (2019). How Polysemy Affects Concreteness Ratings: The Case of Metaphor. Cognitive Science,
43
1, 2–11. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ricoeur, P. (1986). Die lebendige Metapher. Wilhelm Fink.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steen, G. (2008). The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol,
23
(4), 213–241. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steen, G. J. (2011b). From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik.de, 211, 83–110.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steen, G. J. (2017). Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics,
14
(1), 1–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (Vol. 1711, pp. 63–105). Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Urbonaitė, J., Šeškauskienė, I., & Cibulskienė, J. (2019). Linguistic metaphor identification in Lithuanian. In S. Nacey, A. G. Dorst, T. Krennmayr, & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages. MIPVU around the world (Vol. 221, pp. 159–181). John Benjamins Publishing Company. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zlatev, J., & Blomberg, J. (2016). Embodied intersubjectivity, sedimentation and non-actual motion expressions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics,
39
(2), 185–208. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Paliichuk, Elina
2023.
A spiderweb of human trafficking: An empirical linguistic study.
Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :43(4)
► pp. 124 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.