Article published In:
Current challenges in metaphor researchEdited by Nina Julich-Warpakowski and Paula Pérez Sobrino
[Metaphor and the Social World 13:1] 2023
► pp. 16–36
Edited by Nina Julich-Warpakowski and Paula Pérez Sobrino
[Metaphor and the Social World 13:1] 2023
► pp. 16–36
Zooming in on the notion of metaphoricity
Notions, dimensions, and operationalizations
The present contribution addresses the notion of metaphoricity and discusses different positions in relation to this complex and multi-dimensional phenomenon. Generally, the notion of metaphoricity is used when metaphor is not considered a binary category anymore, or when the status of an expression as metaphorical is at stake (e.g. in discussions of metaphor identification). We will focus on the first understanding of metaphoricity as a scalar phenomenon. Despite the fact that the term is used more and more in the metaphor literature, it is often unclear what it actually entails, e.g. how metaphor is gradable. To shed light on this theoretical and methodological problem, in this paper we will discuss different notions of the term metaphoricity by illustrating how metaphoricity is understood and how it can be operationalized and studied.
Keywords: metaphor, metaphoricity, gradability, dynamic, conventionality, semantic similarity
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Notions of metaphoricity
- 3.Dimensions of metaphoricity
- 3.1Semantic similarity between domains involved in a metaphorical mapping
- 3.2Conventionality
- 3.3Noticeability and imaginability
- 3.4Metaphoricity as a matter of use
- 3.5Deliberateness
- 3.6Ecology
- 3.7Metaphorical to whom?
- 4.Conclusion and perspectives for further research
- Notes
-
References
References
Beger, A.
(2019) The contested notion of ‘deliberate metaphor’: What can we learn from ‘unclear’ cases in academic lectures? Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association,
7
(1), 51–66. 
Bortfeld, H., & McGlone, M. S.
(2001) The Continuum of Metaphor Processing. Metaphor and Symbol,
16
(1 & 2), 75–86.
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V.
(2014) Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods,
46
1, 904–911.
Caballero, R., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
(2013) Ways of perceiving, moving, and thinking: Revindicating culture in conceptual metaphor research. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics,
5
(1–2), 268–290.
Cameron, L.
(2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R.
(Eds.) (2010) Metaphor analysis. Research practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. Equinox.
Cox, A.
(2016) Music and Embodied Cognition. Listening, Moving, Feeling, and Thinking. Indiana University Press.
Devylder, S., & Zlatev, J.
(2020) Cutting and Breaking Metaphors of the Self and the Motivation and Sedimentation Model. In A. Baicchi & G. Radden (Eds.), Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language. John Benjamins.
Dirven, R.
(2003) Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (2nd ed., pp. 75–111). Mouton De Gruyter.
Gibbs, Jr., R. W.
(1994) The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
(2015) Counting Metaphors: What Does this Reveal about Language and Thought? Cognitive Semantics,
1
(2), 155–177.
Gibbs, Jr., R. W. Jr.
(2017) Metaphor Wars. Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. Cambridge University Press.
Goatly, A.
(2011[1997]) The Language of Metaphors (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Grady, J. E., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S.
(1999) Blending and metaphor. In G. J. Steen & R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 101–124). John Benjamins.
Hampe, B.
(2017) Embodiment and Discourse: Dimensions and Dynamics of Contemporary Metaphor Theory. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor. Embodied Cognition and Discourse. (pp. 3–23). Cambridge University Press.
Hanks, P.
(2006) Metaphoricity is gradable. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (pp. 17–35). Mouton de Gruyter.
Jensen, T. W.
(2017) Doing Metaphor: An Ecological Perspective on Metaphoricity in Discourse. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse (pp. 257–276). Cambridge University Press.
Jensen, T. W., & Cuffari, E.
(2014) Doubleness in Experience: Toward a Distributed Enactive Approach to Metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol,
29
(4), 278–297.
Jensen, T. W., & Greve, L.
(2019) Ecological cognition and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol,
34
(1), 1–16.
Julich-Warpakowski, N.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors We Live By. The University Of Chicago Press.
(1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metaphor in specialist discourse. Insights and implications for metaphor studies and beyond. In J. B. Herrmann & T. Berber Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor in Specialist Discourse (Vol. 41, pp. 299–314). John Benjamins.
Müller, C.
(2008) Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking. A Dynamic View. The University of Chicago Press.
Müller, C., & Tag, S.
(2010) The Dynamics of Metaphor: Foregrounding and Activating Metaphoricity in Conversational Interaction. Cognitive Semiotics,
10
(6), 85–120.
Nacey, S., Dorst, A. G., Krennmayr, T., & Reijnierse, W. G.
(Eds.) (2019) Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages. MIPVU around the world. (Vol. 221). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Nacey, S., Krennmayr, T., Dorst, A. G., & Reijnierse, W. G.
(2019) What the MIPVU protocol doesn’t tell you (even though it mostly does). In S. Nacey, A. G. Dorst, T. Krennmayr, & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages. MIPVU around the world (Vol. 221, pp. 41–67). John Benjamins.
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol,
22
(1), 1–39.
Reijnierse, W. G.; Burgers, C. F.; Krennmayr, T.; Steen, G. J.
(2018) DMIP: A Method for Identifying Potentially Deliberate Metaphor in Language Use. Corpus Pragmatics,
2
1, 129–147.
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Bolognesi, M., & Krennmayr, T.
(2019) How Polysemy Affects Concreteness Ratings: The Case of Metaphor. Cognitive Science,
43
1, 2–11.
Ricoeur, P.
(1986) Die lebendige Metapher. Wilhelm Fink.
Semino, E.
(2008) Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Steen, G.
(2008) The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol,
23
(4), 213–241.
Steen, G. J.
(2007) Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research. John Benjamins.
(2011a) The contemporary theory of metaphor now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics,
9
(1), 26–64.
Steen, G. J.
(2011b) From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik.de, 211, 83–110.
Steen, G. J.
(2017) Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics,
14
(1), 1–24.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
Stefanowitsch, A.
(2006) Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (Vol. 1711, pp. 63–105). Mouton de Gruyter.
Urbonaitė, J., Šeškauskienė, I., & Cibulskienė, J.
(2019) Linguistic metaphor identification in Lithuanian. In S. Nacey, A. G. Dorst, T. Krennmayr, & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages. MIPVU around the world (Vol. 221, pp. 159–181). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Zlatev, J., & Blomberg, J.
(2016) Embodied intersubjectivity, sedimentation and non-actual motion expressions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics,
39
(2), 185–208.