Cover not available
Article published In:
Current challenges in metaphor research
Edited by Nina Julich-Warpakowski and Paula Pérez-Sobrino
[Metaphor and the Social World 13:1] 2023
► pp. 104–119
Afterword

Measurement matters

An afterword on current challenges in metaphor research

| University of Alberta
Researchers studying metaphor, as a human artifact, as a thing we use in communicating and expression, as an ability we acquire, as a seemingly fundamental process in human embodied cognition, and in other guises, face many methodological hurdles. This article considers several categories of such challenges, and with reference to and in partnership with the other articles in this special issue, seeks to suggest some means of overcoming or at least minimizing the obstacles.
Keywords: metaphor, methods, measurement, subjectivity, authenticity, scientific control, linguistic diversity, multimodality, emotion, metaphor identification
Article outline
  • Measurement: The big picture
  • Measuring metaphor
  • Metaphor: Babies and bathwaters
  • Metaphor proxy wars
  • How metaphorical is a metaphor?
  • New measures and techniques
  • Issues over subjectivity
  • Metaphor complexity
  • Linguistic and cultural diversity
  • Methods for broadened metaphorical research
  • Metaphor and emotion/personality
  • The social dimension of metaphor: Metaphor as social work
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 July 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00031.col
References (24)
References
Aron, A., Lewandowski, G. W., Mashek, D., & Aron, E. N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J. A. (2020). Metaphor thoughtfully. In A. Baicchi (Guest Ed.), A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Eds.), Figurative meaning construction in thought and language. Series: Figurative thought and language (Vol. 9), (pp. 13–44). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L. (2015). Using figurative language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). How language makes meaning: Embodiment and conjoined antonymy. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). On why people don’t say what they mean: Production of figurative formulaic language. In J. Barnden & A. Gargett (Guest Eds.), A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Eds.), Producing figurative expression. Series: Figurative thought and language (Vol. 10), (pp. 129–173). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Humor and figurative language: Good for a laugh, and more. In M. Strick & T. E. Ford (Eds.), Current issues in social psychology: The social psychology of humor, (pp. 92–108). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(forthcoming). The big figurative picture: What’s in a domain. In H. Colston (Ed.), What makes a figure?: Re-thinking figuration. Series: Figurative thought and language (Vol., pp., tbd) . John Benjamins.
Colston, H. L. & Rasse, C. (2022). Figurativity: Cognitive, because it’s social. In H. Colston, G. Steen, & T. Matlock (Guest Eds.), C. F. Burgers (Ed.), Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond. Series: Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication (Vol. 9), (pp. 243–264). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, A., Rasse, C., & Colston, H. L. (2023). On poetry and the science(s) of meaning. Metaphor and Symbol: Special Issue on Poetry, 38(2), pp TBD. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, A. (2017). The standard experimental approach to the study of irony: Let us not be hasty in throwing out the baby with the bathwater. In A. Athanasiadou & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication. Series: Figurative thought and language (Vol. X), (pp. 237–254). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Maddox, L. (2019). Aphantasia: What it’s like to live with no mind’s eye. Science Focus, published online, 14 November.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 ( 1 ), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reid, J., Al-Azary, H., & Katz, A. (2023). Cognitive factors related to metaphor goodness in poetic and non-literary metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 38(2), 130–148. DOI logo
Šorm, E. & Steen, G. (2018). Towards a method for visual metaphor identification. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process, (pp. 18–47). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, B., Kaal, A., & Krennmayr, T. (2010). Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics, 21 ( 4 ), 765–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 14 1, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Veale, T. (2020). Metaphor as sign and as symbol. In J. Barnden & A. Gargett (Guest Eds.), A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Eds.), Producing figurative expression. Series: Figurative thought and language (Vol. 10), (pp. 511–532). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, K. D. (2001). Ostracism: The power of silence. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Zeman, A., Dewar, M., & Della Salla, S. (2015). Lives without imagery: Congenital aphantasia. Cortex, 73 1, 378–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar