Review published In:
Metaphor and the Social WorldVol. 13:2 (2023) ► pp.331–338
Book review
. Metaphor in Legal Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2022. 244 pp. ISBN 1-5275-7849-6 / 978-1-5275-7849-4
Reviewed by
References (7)
Anthony, L. (2015). AntConc (Version
3.5.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus
Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Macmillan-Palgrave. 
Marín Pérez, M. J., & Rea Rizzo, C. (2012). Structure
and design of the British Law Report Corpus (BLRC): a legal corpus of judicial decisions from the
UK. Journal of English
Studies,
10
1, 131–145.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A
Method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and
Symbol, 22 (1). 1–39.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A
Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins Publishing.
Stefanowitsch, A. (2007). Words
and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Th. Gries. (Eds.), Corpus-Based
Approaches to Metaphor and
Metonymy, (pp. 63–105). De Gruyter Mouton.
Wojtczak, S. & Witczak-Plisiecka, I. (2019). Metaphors
and Legal Language: a Few Comments on Ordinary, Specialised and Legal Meaning. Research in
Language, 17 (3), 273–295.