Article published in:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 8:1 (2018) ► pp. 4063
References

References

Bargh, J.
(1994) The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bargh, J., Schwader, K., Hailey, S., Dyer, R., & Boothby, E.
(2012) Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16(12) 593–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B.
(2012) Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Breton, A.
(1969) Manifestoes of surrealism, R. Seaver & H. Lane, Trans. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carney, D., Cuddy, A., & Yap, A.
(2010) Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays cause changes in neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21, 1363–1368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D.
(2008) Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind? Memory & Cognition, 36, 1047–1056. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A.
(1998) STRAIGHT: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 107–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C.
(Eds.) (2008) Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conely, K.
(2003) Robert Desnos, surrealism, and the marvelous in everyday life. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M.
(1990) Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
[ p. 61 ]
Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L.
(2006) A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 1, 95–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Epstein-Jannai, M.
(2010) Some remarks about semi-automatic writing: Between constraints and possibilites in a writing workshop. New Writing, 7, 58–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.
(1984) Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science, 8, 275–304.Google Scholar
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Are deliberate metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World. 1, 26–52.Google Scholar
(2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2017) Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphor in human life. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Colston, H.
(2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., Kushner, J., & Mills, R.
(1991) Authorial intentions and metaphor comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 11–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., Beitel, D., Harrington, M., & Sanders, P.
(1994) Taking a stand on the meanings of stand: Bodily experience as motivation for polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 11, 231–251.Google Scholar
Giora, R.
(2002) On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Is metaphor unique? In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 143–160). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, P., & Glucksberg, S.
(1983) On understanding metaphor: The role of context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 577–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., & Bookin, H.
(1982) On understanding nonliteral speech: can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 21, 85–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.
(1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H.
(1925) Treatise on physiological optics, Volume II. The Optical Society of America 1925.Google Scholar
James, W.
(1890) The principles of psychology. New York: MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, S., Creigh, P., & Bartolotti, J.
(2010) Integrating speech and iconic gestures in a Stroop task: Evidence for automatic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 683–694. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kazmerski, V., Blasko, D., & Dessalegn, B.
(2003) ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 31, 673–689. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B.
(1989) On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 375–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 62 ]
Koutstaal, W.
(1992) Skirting the abyss: A history of experimental explorations of automatic writing in psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 28, 5–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) The agile mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (Vol. 2) (pp. 202–251). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, M., Robinson, M., & Meier, B.
(Eds.) (2014) The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life. Washington, DC: APA Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langton, S., & Bruce, V.
(2007) You must see the point: Automatic processing of curs to the direction of social attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 247–257.Google Scholar
Müller, C.
(2007) Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamics view. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Muldoon, P.
(2007) The end of the poem: Oxford lectures. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Murphy, G.
(1996) On metaphoric representations. Cognition, 60, 173–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Obermeier, C., Holle, H., & Gunter, T. C.
(2011) What iconic gesture fragments reveal about gesture-speech integration: When synchrony is lost, memory can help. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1648–1663. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(2007) The stuff of thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Posner, M., & Snyder, C.
(1975) Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Domic (Eds.), Attention and performance V. (pp. 669–692). New York: Academic Press,Google Scholar
Restak, R.
(1983) Is free will a fraud? Science Digest (October): 53–55.Google Scholar
Searle, J.
(1979) Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. (pp. 92–123). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R.
(1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Solomons, M., & Stein, G.
(1896) Normal motor automatism. Psychological Review, 3, 492–512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.
(2005) The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steen, G.
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Developing, testing, and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stroop, J. R.
(1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 63 ]
Thomas, J.
(1988) The use of automatic writing in self-analysis: A phenomenological examination (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 8902293)Google Scholar
Trotsky, L.
(1930/1970) My life. New York: Pathfinder Press.Google Scholar
Williams, L., & Bargh, J.
(2008) Experiencing physical warm influences interpersonal warmth. Science, 322, 606–607. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C., & Liljenquist, K.
(2006) Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Beger, Anke & Thomas H. Smith
2020.  In How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science [Figurative Thought and Language, 6],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.