Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 11:1 (2021) ► pp.23–45

The container and force schemas in political discourse

The representation of military strategies in Barack Obama’s discourse

| University of Žilina
The paper focuses on metaphors based on the image schemas of container and force that were employed by U.S. President Barack Obama in the campaign against ISIL (The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant). Systematic metaphors based on the schemas of container and force illustrate the strategy of the international alliance against ISIL’s activity. The strategy included the isolation of the organization, the restriction of the flow of foreign fighters and financial resources to the area controlled by ISIL as well as planning military operations designed to weaken the influence of the organization. The analysis has been conducted on the corpus of political speeches delivered by the speaker in the period from June 2014 to September 2016. Theoretical framework that is employed in the analysis of primary data is grounded in Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) which explores ideological aspects of discourse.
Keywords: container schema, force schema, metaphor, political speech, Barack Obama, ISIL
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The container and force schemas
  • 3.Theoretical framework for analysis
  • 4.Data and methodology
  • 5.Findings and discussion
    • 5.1Systematic metaphors based on the container schema in Barack Obama’s discourse
      • 5.1.1 the isolation of the isil’s container
      • 5.1.2 money is a fluid that flows into the container
      • 5.1.3 foreign fighters are a fluid that flows into the container
      • 5.1.4 the central part of the container is the heart of isil
    • 5.2Systematic metaphors based on the force schema in Barack Obama’s discourse
      • 5.2.1 squeezing/ tightening the isil’s container is attacking
      • 5.2.2 the machine metaphor – isil’s heart is a machine that pumps funds and propaganda outside the container
    • 5.3The combination of the container and force schemas
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 8 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.18031.ham
References (44)
References
Alejo, R. (2010). Where does the money go? An analysis of the container metaphor in economics: The market and the economy. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1137–1150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2000). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In Barcelona, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 31–58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2002). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 207–278). New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., Low, G., & Maslen, R. (2010). Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In R. Maslen & L. Cameron (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 116–146). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cap, P. (2002). Explorations in political discourse: Methodological and critical perspectives. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2014). Applying cognitive pragmatics to critical discourse studies: A proximization analysis of three public space discourses. Journal of Pragmatics, 701, 16–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Politicians and rhetoric: the persuasive power of metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse and Society, 17(5), 563–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). The communication of leadership: The design of leadership style. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2014). Analysing political speeches: rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. (1996). Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common house. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
(2003). Deixis and distance: President Clinton’s justification of intervention in Kosovo. In M. Dedaić & D. Nelson (Eds.), At war with words (pp. 95–126). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Analysing political discourse: theory and practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P., & Lakoff, G. (1995). Foreign policy by metaphor. In C. Schäffner & A. Wenden (Eds.), Language and Peace (pp. 37–59). Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Chilton, P., & Schäffner, C. (2002). Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In P. Chilton & C. Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorst, A. G. (2017). Textual patterning of metaphor. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.) The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 175–192). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Tendahl, M., & Okonski, L. (2011). Inferring pragmatic messages from metaphor. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 7(1), 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Washing the brain – metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2004). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Metaphor: a practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh:The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Maslen, R. (2017). Finding systematic metaphors. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 88–101). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mason, Z. J. (2004). CorMet: A computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system. Computational Linguistics, 30(1), 23–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2003). Ideological functions of metaphor: The conceptual metaphors of health and illness in public discourse. In R. Dirven, R. Frank & M. Pütz (Eds.), Cognitive models in language and thought (pp. 327–352). New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). The heart of the European body politic: British and German perspectives on Europe’s central organ. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25(5–6), 437–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3 (1), 41–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
(2016b). What can metaphor theory contribute to the study of political discourse? In M. Degani, P. Frassi & M. I. Lorenzetti (Eds.), The Languages of politics/La politique et ses langages Volume 1 (pp. 9–28). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2017a). Metaphor and persuasion in politics. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 309–322). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2017b). Metaphor, irony and sarcasm in public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 1091, 95–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niemeier, S. (2000). Straight from the heart – metonymic and metaphorical explorations. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 195–213). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Peña, M. S. (2008). Dependency systems for image-schematic patterns in a usage-based approach to language. Journal of Pragmatics 40(6), 1041–1066. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1), pp. 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reali, F., & Arciniegas, C. (2015). Metaphorical conceptualization of emotion in Spanish: Two studies on the role of framing. Metaphor and the Social World 5(1), 20–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, A. A., & Tucker, J. A. (2018). The Islamic state’s information warfare. Measuring the success of ISIS’s online strategy. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(2), 258–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1), 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. (1990). Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wu, Yang
2024. The fight metaphor in translation: From patriotism to pragmatism. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 36:1 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.