Review published in:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 2:1 (2012) ► pp. 121129
References
Firth, J. R.
(1951) Modes of meaning. In J. R. Firth (Ed.), Papers in linguistics 1934–1951 (pp. 190–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1957) A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–55. In F. R. Palmer (Ed.), Selected papers of J.R. Firth 1952–1957 (pp. 168–205). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(2006) Prototype theory. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 141–166). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S.
(1995) Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 153–180). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4), 457–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R.
(1997) Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 71, 183–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 919–929. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, D., & Fischer, K.
(2010) Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A.
(1997) The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Divjak, D.
(2009) Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based approach to cognitive semantic analysis. In V. Evans & S. S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57–75). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(2006) Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grondelaers, S., Geeraerts, D., & Speelman, D.
(2007) A case for a cognitive corpus linguistics. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez & M. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 149–169). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heylen, K.
(2005) A quantitative corpus study of German word order variation. In M. Reis (Ed.), Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical and computational perspectives (pp. 241–264). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, M.
(2008) Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M.
(2005) Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Louw, B.
(2000) Contextual prosodic theory: Bringing semantic prosodies to life. In C. Heffer & H. Sauntson (Eds.), Words in context: A tribute to John Sinclair on his retirement (pp. 48–94). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T.
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steinvall, A.
(2002) English colour terms in context. Ph.D. Dissertation. Umeå University: Skrifter från moderna språk 31.Google Scholar
Wulff, S.
(2010) Rethinking idiomaticity: A usage-based approach. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar