Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 13:2 (2023) ► pp.221–247

Individual differences in identifying creative metaphors from video Ads

| Fudan University
| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Reliable identification of metaphors from multimodal discourse has attracted scholarly attention in recent years. However, the role of individual differences in identifying creative metaphors from video ads is underexplored from an empirical perspective. This includes the extent to which individual differences influence metaphor identification in multimodal discourse and how the individual differences result in divergent identification. Our study contributes to addressing these issues by investigating how the background of researching metaphors influences identifying creative metaphors from video ads. We compared results of creative metaphor identification from three metaphor analysts and three external annotators who were novice to metaphor research and probed into the underlying reasons for divergent identification through discussions among six annotators. Both groups of annotators applied Creative Metaphor Identification Procedure for Video Advertisements (C-MIPVA) (Pan & Tay, 2021) into the same 20 Chinese video ads through a systematic process of inter-rater reliability examinations. Results from Fleiss’ Kappa and Percentage Agreement provided substantial support for reliable identification, regardless of the metaphor research background. Discussions among annotators revealed that the interplay between the individual differences in life experience and the influences of temporal and dynamic discourse lead to extra identification, different content, and missing cases of metaphors.

Keywords: creative metaphors, video ads, identification, individual differences, C-MIPVA
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Assumptions of identifying metaphors from multimodal discourse
    • 2.2The issue of inter-rater reliability
    • 2.3Creative metaphor identification procedure for video Ads (C-MIPVA)
      • 2.3.1The working definition of creative metaphors in video ads
      • 2.3.2The six-step procedure of C-MIPVA
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Corpus building
    • 3.2Applying C-MIPVA
    • 3.3Reliability examinations
  • 3.Findings and discussions
    • 3.1Results of reliability examinations
    • 3.2Issues of identifying creative metaphors from video Ads
      • 3.2.1Individual differences in life experience
      • 3.2.2Influences of the temporal discourse
      • 3.2.3Influences of the dynamic discourse
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 August 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.20016.pan
References
Ang, S. H., & Lim, E. A. C.
(2006) The influence of metaphors and product type on brand personality perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 35 (2), 39–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateman, J., & Hiippala, T.
(2020) Statistics for Multimodality: why, when, how–an invitation. SocArXiv. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. N.
(1989) A decision model for prioritizing and addressing consumer information problems. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 8 (1), 161–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobrova, L.
(2015) A Procedure for Identifying Potential Multimodal Metaphors in TV Commercials. Multimodal Communication, 4 (2), 113–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolognesi, M., Pilgram, R., & van den Heerik, R.
(2017) Reliability in content analysis: The case of semantic feature norms classification. Behavior Research Methods, 49 (6), 1984–2001. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bort-Mir, L.
(2019) Developing, Applying, and Testing FILMIP: the Filmic Metaphor Identification Procedure. (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Jaume, Castellón de la Plana. Retrieved from [URL]
Chang, C.-T., Wu, Y.-C., Lee, Y.-K., & Chu, X.-Y.
(2018) Right metaphor, right place: choosing a visual metaphor based on product type and consumer differences. International Journal of Advertising, 37 (2), 309–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, C.-T., & Yen, C.-T.
(2013) Missing ingredients in metaphor advertising: The right formula of metaphor type, product type, and need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 42 (1), 80–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J.
(1968) Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70 (4), 213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
EI Refaie, E.
(2003) Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 2 (1), 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, J. L.
(1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76 (5), 378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C.
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials. Public Journal of Semiotics, 1 (1), 15–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In E. F. McQuarrie & B. J. Phillips (Eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric (pp. 178–204). ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
(2009) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–44). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Relevance Theory as model for analysing visual and multimodal communication. Visual Communication, 4 1, 51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Visual and multimodal metaphor in advertising: Cultural perspectives. Styles of Communication, 9 (2), 26–41.Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Paling, S.
(2018) The metaphorical representation of depression in short, wordless animation films. Visual Communication, 0 (0), 1–21.Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
(Eds.) (2009) Multimodal Metaphor. Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gkiouzepas, L., & Hogg, M. K.
(2011) Articulating a new framework for visual metaphors in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 40 (1), 103–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glen, S.
(2016) Inter-rater reliability IRR: Definition, Calculation. Retrieved from [URL]
Guan, Y., & Forceville, C.
(2020) Making cross-cultural meaning in five Chinese promotional clips: metonymies and metaphors Intercultural Pragmatics, 17 (2), 123–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iversen, M. H.
(2017) Employing film form and style in the argumentative analysis of political advertising. In A. Tseronis & C. Forceville (Eds.), Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres (pp. 217–238). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeong, S. H.
(2008) Visual metaphor in advertising: Is the persuasive effect attributable to visual argumentation or metaphorical rhetoric? Journal of Marketing Communications, 14 (1), 59–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Baek, Y., & Choi, Y. H.
(2012) The structural effects of metaphor-elicited cognitive and affective elaboration levels on attitude toward the ad. Journal of Advertising, 41 (2), 77–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, K.
(2004) Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30 (3), 411–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, G., & Dirven, R.
(Eds.) (2008) Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, G., & Geeraerts, D.
(2013) Contexts of use in cognitive sociolinguistics. Journal of Pragmatics, 52 1, 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–250). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh. Basic books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C.
(2009) Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Müller, C., & Schmitt, C.
(2015) Audio-visual metaphors of the financial crisis: meaning making and the flow of experience. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 15 (2), 311–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, X.
(2019, August). A comparative study of two approaches to metaphor identification in video ads. Paper presented at The 15th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Kwansei Gakuin University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Pan, X. & Tay, D.
(2021) Identifying creative metaphor in video ads. In L. Lin, INI. Mwinlaaru & D. Tay (Eds.), Approaches to specialized genres: In memory of Stephen Evans (pp.216–240). Routledge.Google Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P.
(2017) Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P., & Littlemore, J.
(2017) Facing methodological challenges in multimodal metaphor research. In A. Baicchi & E. Pinelli (Eds.), Cognitive modeling in language and discourse across cultures. (pp. 383–399). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P., Littlemore, J., & Houghton, D.
(2019) The role of figurative complexity in the comprehension and appreciation of advertisements. Applied Linguistics, 40 (6), 957–991. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (1), 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubin, P. H.
(2000) Information regulation (including regulation of advertising). In B. Boudewijn & d. G. Gerrit (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics (Vol. 31, pp. 271–295). Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Scherer, T., Greifenstein, S., & Kappelhoff, H.
(2014) Expressive movements in audiovisual media: Modulating affective experience. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeil, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body–Language–Communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 2081–2092). De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Šorm, E., & Steen, G.
(2018) VISMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor identification In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stampoulidis, G., & Bolognesi, M.
(2019) Bringing metaphors back to the streets: A corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication, 0 (0), 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.
(2018) Visual metaphor: Structure and process. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G., Dorst, L., Herrmann, B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.
(1999) Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Urios-Aparisi, E.
(2009) Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 95–116). Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T.
(2001) Semiotics and iconography. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 92–118). Sage.Google Scholar
Verstraten, P.
(2009) Film narratology. University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R.
(2013) Mass Media Research: An introduction (10th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Zhang, C., & Xu, C.
(2018) Argument by Multimodal Metaphor as Strategic Maneuvering in TV Commercials: A Case Study. Argumentation, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar