Individual differences in identifying creative metaphors from video Ads
Reliable identification of metaphors from multimodal discourse has attracted scholarly attention in recent years. However, the role of individual differences in identifying creative metaphors from video ads is underexplored from an empirical perspective. This includes the extent to which individual differences influence metaphor identification in multimodal discourse and how the individual differences result in divergent identification. Our study contributes to addressing these issues by investigating how the background of researching metaphors influences identifying creative metaphors from video ads. We compared results of creative metaphor identification from three metaphor analysts and three external annotators who were novice to metaphor research and probed into the underlying reasons for divergent identification through discussions among six annotators. Both groups of annotators applied Creative Metaphor Identification Procedure for Video Advertisements (C-MIPVA) (
Pan & Tay, 2021) into the same 20 Chinese video ads through a systematic process of inter-rater reliability examinations. Results from Fleiss’ Kappa and Percentage Agreement provided substantial support for reliable identification, regardless of the metaphor research background. Discussions among annotators revealed that the interplay between the individual differences in life experience and the influences of temporal and dynamic discourse lead to extra identification, different content, and missing cases of metaphors.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1Assumptions of identifying metaphors from multimodal discourse
- 2.2The issue of inter-rater reliability
- 2.3Creative metaphor identification procedure for video Ads (C-MIPVA)
- 2.3.1The working definition of creative metaphors in video ads
- 2.3.2The six-step procedure of C-MIPVA
- 3.Method
- 3.1Corpus building
- 3.2Applying C-MIPVA
- 3.3Reliability examinations
- 3.Findings and discussions
- 3.1Results of reliability examinations
- 3.2Issues of identifying creative metaphors from video Ads
- 3.2.1Individual differences in life experience
- 3.2.2Influences of the temporal discourse
- 3.2.3Influences of the dynamic discourse
- 4.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (52)
References
Ang, S. H., & Lim, E. A. C. (2006). The influence of metaphors and product type on brand personality perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Advertising,
35
(2), 39–53.
Bateman, J., & Hiippala, T. (2020). Statistics for Multimodality: why, when, how–an invitation. SocArXiv.
Bloom, P. N. (1989). A decision model for prioritizing and addressing consumer information problems. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing,
8
(1), 161–180.
Bobrova, L. (2015). A Procedure for Identifying Potential Multimodal Metaphors in TV Commercials. Multimodal Communication,
4
(2), 113–131.
Bolognesi, M., Pilgram, R., & van den Heerik, R. (2017). Reliability in content analysis: The case of semantic feature norms classification. Behavior Research Methods,
49
(6), 1984–2001.
Bort-Mir, L. (2019). Developing, Applying, and Testing FILMIP: the Filmic Metaphor Identification Procedure. (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Jaume, Castellón de la Plana. Retrieved from [URL]
Chang, C.-T., Wu, Y.-C., Lee, Y.-K., & Chu, X.-Y. (2018). Right metaphor, right place: choosing a visual metaphor based on product type and consumer differences. International Journal of Advertising,
37
(2), 309–336.
Chang, C.-T., & Yen, C.-T. (2013). Missing ingredients in metaphor advertising: The right formula of metaphor type, product type, and need for cognition. Journal of Advertising,
42
(1), 80–94.
Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin,
70
(4), 213.
EI Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication,
2
(1), 75–95.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin,
76
(5), 378.
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Routledge.
Forceville, C. (2007). Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials. Public Journal of Semiotics,
1
(1), 15–34.
Forceville, C. (2008). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In E. F. McQuarrie & B. J. Phillips (Eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric (pp. 178–204). ME Sharpe.
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–44). Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, C. (2014). Relevance Theory as model for analysing visual and multimodal communication. Visual Communication,
4
1, 51.
Forceville, C. (2017). Visual and multimodal metaphor in advertising: Cultural perspectives. Styles of Communication,
9
(2), 26–41.
Forceville, C., & Paling, S. (2018). The metaphorical representation of depression in short, wordless animation films. Visual Communication,
0
(0), 1–21.
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal Metaphor. Walter de Gruyter.
Gkiouzepas, L., & Hogg, M. K. (2011). Articulating a new framework for visual metaphors in advertising. Journal of Advertising,
40
(1), 103–120.
Glen, S. (2016). Inter-rater reliability IRR: Definition, Calculation. Retrieved from [URL]
Guan, Y., & Forceville, C. (2020). Making cross-cultural meaning in five Chinese promotional clips: metonymies and metaphors Intercultural Pragmatics,
17
(2), 123–149.
Jeong, S. H. (2008). Visual metaphor in advertising: Is the persuasive effect attributable to visual argumentation or metaphorical rhetoric? Journal of Marketing Communications,
14
(1), 59–73.
Kim, J., Baek, Y., & Choi, Y. H. (2012). The structural effects of metaphor-elicited cognitive and affective elaboration levels on attitude toward the ad. Journal of Advertising,
41
(2), 77–96.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research,
30
(3), 411–433.
Kristiansen, G., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (2008). Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kristiansen, G., & Geeraerts, D. (2013). Contexts of use in cognitive sociolinguistics. Journal of Pragmatics,
52
1, 1–4.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–250). Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. Basic books.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago Press.
Müller, C. (2009). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. University of Chicago Press.
Müller, C., & Schmitt, C. (2015). Audio-visual metaphors of the financial crisis: meaning making and the flow of experience. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada,
15
(2), 311–342.
Pan, X. (2019, August). A comparative study of two approaches to metaphor identification in video ads. Paper presented at The 15th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Kwansei Gakuin University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Pan, X. & Tay, D. (2021). Identifying creative metaphor in video ads. In L. Lin, INI. Mwinlaaru & D. Tay (Eds.), Approaches to specialized genres: In memory of Stephen Evans (pp.216–240). Routledge.
Pérez-Sobrino, P., & Littlemore, J. (2017). Facing methodological challenges in multimodal metaphor research. In A. Baicchi & E. Pinelli (Eds.), Cognitive modeling in language and discourse across cultures. (pp. 383–399). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Pérez-Sobrino, P., Littlemore, J., & Houghton, D. (2019). The role of figurative complexity in the comprehension and appreciation of advertisements. Applied Linguistics,
40
(6), 957–991.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol,
22
(1), 1–40.
Rubin, P. H. (2000). Information regulation (including regulation of advertising). In B. Boudewijn & d. G. Gerrit (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics (Vol. 31, pp. 271–295). Edward Elgar.
Scherer, T., Greifenstein, S., & Kappelhoff, H. (2014). Expressive movements in audiovisual media: Modulating affective experience. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeil, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body–Language–Communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 2081–2092). De Gruyter.
Stampoulidis, G., & Bolognesi, M. (2019). Bringing metaphors back to the streets: A corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication,
0
(0), 1–35.
Steen, G., Dorst, L., Herrmann, B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 95–116). Mouton De Gruyter.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Semiotics and iconography. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 92–118). Sage.
Verstraten, P. (2009). Film narratology. University of Toronto Press.
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Mass Media Research: An introduction (10th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Zhang, C., & Xu, C. (2018). Argument by Multimodal Metaphor as Strategic Maneuvering in TV Commercials: A Case Study. Argumentation, 1–17.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Pan, Molly Xie
2023.
Metaphorical and multimodal representation of autism in Chinese video public service announcements: Lonely twinkling.
Language and Health 1:1
► pp. 67 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.