Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 14:1 (2024) ► pp.109–129

Choosing the dark path

Preferences for darkness and interpersonal antagonism

ORCID logo | North Dakota State University
| North Dakota State University
| North Dakota State University
Dark personalities are those that are malevolent and antagonistic. Underlying such tendencies may be some attraction to perceptual darkness, given that darkness has been symbolically linked to malevolence and evil throughout human history. In the present research (total N = 501), participants were asked to choose whether they prefer dark or light as abstract perceptual concepts. Preferences for darkness were non-normative as well as informative concerning interpersonal functioning. Specifically, dark-preferring individuals scored lower in agreeableness or higher in antagonism (Study 1) and they also exhibited lower levels of prosocial feeling and personality in the conduct of their daily lives (Study 2). An attraction to darkness therefore belies tendencies toward antagonism and callousness. In total, the research highlights the manner in which a simple preference judgment involving metaphor-rich stimuli can be used to gain key insights into the motivational substrates of social functioning.
Keywords: Dark Symbolism, Preferences, Personality, Antagonism, Prosocial
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Study One
    • 2.1Method
      • 2.1.1Participants and general procedures
      • 2.1.2Preferences for darkness
      • 2.1.3Agreeableness versus antagonism
    • 2.2Results
      • 2.2.1Preferences for darkness
      • 2.2.2Group differences in antagonism-agreeableness
    • 2.3Discussion
  • 3.Study two
    • 3.1Method
      • 3.1.1Participants and general procedures
      • 3.1.2Preferences for darkness
      • 3.1.3Daily diary protocol
    • 3.2Results
    • 3.3Discussion
  • 4.General discussion
  • 4.1Additional implications and analysis
  • 4.2Questions, limitations, and future directions
  • 4.3Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 4 August 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.21026.rob
References (79)
References
Adams, F. M., & Osgood, C. E. (1973). A cross-cultural study of the affective meanings of color. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4 1, 135–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanca, M. J., Alarcón, R., Arnau, J., Bono, R., & Bendayan, R. (2018). Effect of variance ratio on ANOVA robustness: Might 1.5 be the limit? Behavior Research Methods, 50 1, 937–962. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54 1, 579–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Book, A., Visser, B. A., Blais, J., Hosker-Field, A., Methot-Jones, T., Gauthier, N. Y., et al. (2016). Unpacking more “evil”: What is at the core of the dark tetrad? Personality and Individual Differences, 90 1, 269–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouman, M. J. (1987). Luxury and control: The urbanity of street lighting in nineteenth-century cities. Journal of Urban History, 14 1, 7–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bridwell, B., Carbonetti, B., & Tagliarina, C. M. (2016). Going to the “Dark Side”: Star Wars symbolism and the acceptance of torture in the US security community. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association , Atlanta, GA.
Clarke, T., & Costall, A. (2008). The emotional connotations of color: A qualitative investigation. Color Research and Application, 33 1, 406–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawford, L. E. (2009). Conceptual metaphors of affect. Emotion Review, 1 1, 129–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowe, M. L., Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2018). Uncovering the structure of agreeableness from self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 86 1, 771–787. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cvencek, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2012). Balanced identity theory: Review of evidence for implicit consistency in social cognition. In B. Gawronski & F. Strack (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition (pp. 157–177). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., Maddox, C. D., Nosek, B. A., Rudman, K. A., Devos, T., et al. (2021). Meta-analytic use of balance identity theory to validate the implicit association test. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47 1, 185–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eliade, M. (1996). Patterns in comparative religion. University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
El-Sharif, A. (2012). Metaphors we believe by: Islamic doctrine as evoked by the Prophet Muhammad’s metaphors. Critical Discourse, 9 1, 231–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12 1, 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behaviour Research Methods, 41 1, 1149–1160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetterman, A. K., Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2017). Dispositional properties of metaphor: The predictive power of the sweet taste metaphor for trait and daily prosociality. Journal of Individual Differences, 38 1, 175–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetterman, A. K., & Robinson, M. D. (2013). Do you use your head or follow your heart? Self-location predicts personality, emotion, decision making, and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105 1, 316–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleeson, W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13 1, 83–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. J., & Renckens, T. (2013). The good is light and bad is dark metaphor in feature films. Metaphor and the Social World, 3 1, 160–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7 1, 199–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B. (2012). Back to the future of dissonance theory: Cognitive consistency as a core motive. Social Cognition, 30 1, 652–668. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48 1, 529–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 71, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). ‘Theories are buildings’ revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 1, 267–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graziano, W. G., & Tobin, R. M. (2019). Theoretical conceptualizations of agreeableness and antagonism. In J. D. Miller & D. R. Lynam (Eds.), The handbook of antagonism: Conceptualizations, assessment, consequences, and treatment of the low end of agreeableness (pp. 127–139). Elsevier Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 1, 1464–1480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habashi, M. M., Graziano, W. G., & Hoover, A. E. (2016). Searching for the prosocial personality: A big five approach to linking personality and prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42 1, 1177–1192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartley, J. E. (1974). Lighting reinforces crime fight. Buttenheim.Google Scholar
Jäkel, O. (2002). Hypotheses revisited: The cognitive theory of metaphor applied to religious texts. Retrieved from [URL]
Jonason, P. K., & McCain, J. (2012). Using the HEXACO model to test the validity of the Dirty Dozen measure of the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 53 1, 935–938. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jonason, P. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2018). The fundamental social motives that characterize dark personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 132 1, 98–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the Dark Triad. European Journal of Personality, 27 1, 521–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1931/1960). The structure of the psyche. In W. McGuire, H. Read, M. Fordham, & G. Adler (Eds.), Collected works volume 8: The structure and dynamics of the psyche (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (pp.139–158). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krishnakumar, S., & Robinson, M. D. (2015). Maintaining an even keel: An affect-mediated model of mindfulness and hostile work behavior. Emotion, 15 1, 579–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakens, D. (2014). Grounding social embodiment. In: D. C. Molden (Ed.), Understanding priming effects in social psychology (pp. 175–190). The Guilford Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1986). A figure of thought. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 1 1, 215–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2014). The Dark Triad, the Big Five, and the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 67 1, 2–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorah, J. (2018). Effect size measures for multilevel models: Definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 6 1, ArtID: 8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2019). The basic trait of Antagonism: An unfortunately underappreciated construct. Journal of Research in Personality, 81 1, 118–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2005). The metaphorical representation of affect. Metaphor and Symbol, 20 1, 239–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Crawford, L. E., & Ahlvers, W. J. (2007). When ‘light’ and ‘dark’ thoughts become light and dark responses: Affect biases brightness judgments. Emotion, 7 1, 366–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miklas, S., & Arnold, S. J. (1999). ‘The extraordinary self’: Gothic culture and the construction of the self. Journal of Marketing Management, 15 1, 563–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeller, S. K., Nicpon, C. G., & Robinson, M. D. (2014). Responsiveness to the negative affect system as a function of emotion perception: Relations between affect and sociability in three daily diary studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40 1, 1012–1023. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125 1, 656–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, Machievellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12 1, 183–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musek, J., Grum, D. K. (2021). The bright side of personality. Heliyon, 7 1, e06370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nezlek, J. B. (2012). Multilevel modeling analyses of diary-style data. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 257–283). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 1, 44–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, M. J. (2011). Primary metaphors and monomodal visual metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 1, 1568–1580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osborn, M. (1967). Archetypal metaphors in rhetoric: The light-dark family. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 53 1, 115–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., & Sammartino, J. (2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology, 64 1, 77–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36 1, 556–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Persich, M. R., Bair, J. L., Steinemann, B., Nelson, S., Fetterman, A. K., & Robinson, M. D. (2019). Hello darkness my old friend: Preferences for darkness vary by neuroticism and co-occur with negative affect. Cognition and Emotion, 33 1, 885–900. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Persich, M. R., Steinemann, B., Fetterman, A. K., & Robinson, M. D. (2021). Drawn to the light: Predicting religiosity using ‘God is light’ metaphor. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 13 1, 390–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. D., Bair, J. L., Liu, T., Scott, M. J., & Penzel, I. B. (2017). Of tooth and claw: Predator self-identifications mediate gender differences in interpersonal arrogance. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 77 1, 272–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. D., & Fetterman, A. K. (2014). Toward a metaphor-enriched personality psychology. In M. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), The power for metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 133–152). American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. D., Fetterman, A. K., Meier, B. P., Persich, M. R., & Waters, M. R. (2021). Embodied perspectives on personality. In M. D. Robinson & L. E. Thomas (Eds.), Embodied psychology: Thinking, feeling, and acting (pp. 477–498). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. D., & Gordon, K. H. (2011). Personality dynamics: Insights from the personality social cognitive literature. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93 1, 161–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. D., Liu, T., & Bair, J. L. (2015). Affect-related influences on color perception. In A. J. Elliot, M. D. Fairchild, & A. Franklin (Eds.), Handbook of color psychology (pp. 660–675). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. D., & Neighbors, C. (2006). Catching the mind in action: Implicit methods in personality research and assessment. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 115–125). American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherbaum, C. A., & Ferreter, J. M. (2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12 1, 347–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schloss, K. B., Poggesi, R. M., & Palmer, S. E. (2011). Effects of university affiliation and ‘school spirit’ on color preferences: Berkeley versus Stanford. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18 1, 498–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherman, G. D., & Clore, G. L. (2009). The color of sin: White and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution. Psychological Science, 20 1, 1019–1025. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (2002). Structural dynamics of cognition: From consistency theories to constraint satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6 1, 283–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23 1, 323–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & LeBretson, J. M. (2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35 1, S41–S60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tennen, H., Affleck, G., & Armeli, S. (2005). Personality and experience revisited. Journal of Personality, 73 1, 1465–1484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vize, C. E., Collison, K. L., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2020). The ‘core’ of the dark triad: A test of competing hypotheses. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11 1, 91–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vize, C. E., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (in press). Examining the conceptual and empirical distinctiveness of agreeableness and ‘dark’ personality items. Journal of Personality. DOI logo
Vize, C. E., Ringwald, W. R., Edershile, E. A., & Wright, A. G. C. (2022). Antagonism in daily life: An exploratory ecological momentary assessment study. Clinical Psychological Science, 10 1, 90–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weightman, B. A. (1996). Sacred landscapes and the phenomenon of light. The Geographical Review, 1 1, 59–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
West, S. G., Ryu, E., Kwok, O., & Cham, H. (2011). Multilevel modeling: Current and future applications in personality research. Journal of Personality, 79 1, 2–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, J. S., & Trapnell, P. D. (1996). A dyadic-interpersonal perspective on the five-factor model. In J. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 88–162). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Winter, B. (2014). Horror movies and the cognitive ecology of primary metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 29 1, 151–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, H. G. (1957). Good and evil; light and darkness; joy and sorrow in Beowulf. The Review of English Studies, 8 1, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, N. (2015). Metaphorical character of moral cognition: A comparative and decompositional analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 30 1, 163–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar