Article In:
Metaphor and the Social World: Online-First Articles

Educational technology, higher education discourses and the lived experience of lecturers as users

Exploring the metaphors

| University of Bolton
Technological innovations, under the aegis of ‘technology-enhanced learning’ (TEL), are high on policy agenda in higher education institutions (HEIs) in the UK and elsewhere. These developments have a direct impact on the conditions of teaching and learning. The socio-cultural dimension – the impact of change on working communities and their practices and beliefs on the ground – appears under-researched in empirical work (Selwyn, 2022). This paper reports on a qualitative study incorporating an analysis of linguistic metaphors that attempted to investigate that gap in one institutional context.
It begins with a critical review of metaphors associated with policy and educational technology innovation in education discourses more broadly. Teaching staff were interviewed from across the institution’s main faculties. The interview transcripts formed a databank of naturally occurring language. Respondents used a range of metaphors, both conventional and novel, revealing insights into the affective and sociocultural dimensions of experience and understanding as well as perceptions of changing professional roles. For triangulation, linguistic analyses of relevant documentary sources, where available, were made and an example is included here. Overall, a more nuanced understanding of lecturers’ lived experience and engagement with educational technology was achieved by focusing on their metaphor usage.
Keywords: educational technologies, higher education, ethnographic research, critical discourse analysis, linguistic metaphors
Article outline
  • 1.Educational technology, education policy and metaphor: A critical overview
  • 2.Aims and approach
  • 3.Conduct and methods
  • 4.Examples from the spoken data
  • 5.Discussion
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (23)
References
Bager-Elsborg, A. & Greve, L. (2017). Establishing a method for analysing metaphors in higher education teaching: A case from business management teaching, Higher Education Research & Development, 37 (8), 1329–1342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baynham, M. (2000). Academic writing in new discipline areas. In Lea, M. and B. Stierer. (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 17–31). Open University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (1999). Operationalizing ‘metaphor’ for applied linguistics research. In Cameron, L. and Low, G. (Eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 3–28). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. & Maslen, R. (Eds.) (2010). Metaphor analysis. Equinox.Google Scholar
Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2011). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns (2nd ed). McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). Corpus-based research into metaphor. In Cameron, L. and Low, G. (Eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 177–199). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar
Goatly, A. & Hiradhar, P. (2016). Critical reading and writing in the digital age. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles and practice. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Martorella, P. (1997). Technology and the social studies-or: Which way to the sleeping giant? Theory and Research in Social Education, 25 (4), 511–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, L. (2018). A critical metaphor analysis of educational technology research in the social studies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18 (3), 538–555.Google Scholar
Nacey, S. (2023). Systematic metaphors in Norwegian doctoral dissertation acknowledgements. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67 (5), 679–694. DOI logo
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in Discourse, Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9 (5), 1–6Google Scholar
Rundell, M. (Ed.) (2002). Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Distrusting educational technology. Routledge.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. (2013). Digital renegades in America: Changing metaphors to realize the potential of technology in education. Critical Questions in Education, 4 (1), 30–41.Google Scholar
Trowler, P. & Pritchard, C. (Eds.) (2003). Realizing qualitative research into higher education. Routledge.Google Scholar