Review published In:
Metaphor and the Social WorldVol. 4:1 (2014) ► pp.138–146
Book review
. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 14]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2010. xi + 238 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 3903 7Hardback 978 90 272 3904 4Paperback
Reviewed by
References (28)
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
Carston, R., & Wearing, C. (2011). Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Language and Cognition, 3(2), 283–312. 
Dirven, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2010). Looking back at 30 years of cognitive linguistics. In E. Tabakowska, M. Choinski & L. Wiraszka (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics in action: From theory to application and back (pp. 13–70). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, C. & Uriós-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2007). Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 2–18). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 481, 529–562.
Gibbs, R., Bogdonovich, J., Sykes, J., & Barr, D. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 371, 141–154.
Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge.
Haser, V. (2005). Metaphor, metonymy, and experientialist philosophy: Challenging cognitive se-mantics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Israel, M., Harding, J., & Tobin, V. (2004). On simile. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 123–135). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Julich, N., & Georgakopoulos, T. (2013). MIPVU: Theoretical considerations and borderline cases. Oral presentation at the Metaphor Lab Winter School: Metaphor Identification and Analysis. January, 21–25, 2013 at the Vrije Universiteit of Amsterdam.
Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion concepts. New York: Springer-Verlag.
(2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
O’Donoghue, J. (2009). Is a metaphor (like) a simile? Differences in meaning, effects and processing. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 211, 125–149.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Ritchie, D. (2003). Argument is war – or is it a game of chess? Multiple meanings in the analysis of implicit metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 125–146.
(2004). Common ground in metaphor theory: Continuing the conversation. Metaphor and Symbol, 191, 233–244.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2007). High level cognitive models: In search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behavior. In K. Kosecki (Ed.), Perspectives on metonymy (pp. 11–30). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Pérez-Hernández, L. (2011). Conceptual metaphor theory: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 1–25.
Scholfield, P. (1995). Quantifying language: A researcher’s and teacher’s guide to gathering language data and reducing it to figures. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Vervaeke, J., & Kennedy, J. M. (1996). Metaphors in language and thought: Falsification and multiple meanings. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11(4), 273–284.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Bajzát, Tímea Borbála & Simon Gábor
2024. A case study of comparative metaphor analysis in Finnish and Hungarian news texts. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 55 ff. 
Simon, Gábor, Tímea Bajzát, Júlia Ballagó, Zsuzsanna Havasi, Emese K. Molnár & Eszter Szlávich
2023. When MIPVU goes to no man’s land: a new language resource for hybrid, morpheme-based metaphor identification in Hungarian. Language Resources and Evaluation
Biase-Dyson, Camilla Di
2021. Review of Nacey, Dorst, Krennmayr & Reijnierse (2019): Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the world. Metaphor and the Social World 11:2 ► pp. 373 ff.
Bizzoni, Yuri, Marco S. G. Senaldi & Alessandro Lenci
2018. Finding the Neural Net: Deep-learning Idiom Type Identification from Distributional Vectors. Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.