Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 5:1 (2015) ► pp.82–101

Political metaphor, a matter of purposeful style

On the rational, emotional and strategic purposes of political metaphor

| Maastricht University, the Netherlands

There are currently attempts to dovetail classical and conceptual metaphor to improve analyses of metaphor in political discourse, but the results, to date, are not robust or sufficiently comprehensive. In this article, I return to Aristotle’s original definition of metaphor in order to set up a framework for the analysis of political metaphors. I first designate the exact position of Aristotle’s theory within conceptual metaphor theory, in order to avoid a lack of coherence between classical and conceptual metaphor theory. In the combination of the two theories I am able to define three styles of purposeful political use of metaphor: reason-based, emotion-based and strategy-based usage of (conceptual) metaphor. These styles are significant, because using a political metaphor is performing a political speech-act, and an important purpose of that speech-act, besides persuasion, is establishing a political identity and style. Examples of the three metaphor purposes and styles show how they can be identified in political discourse. The framework can be used in further political analysis to assess what the role of rhetorical style is in political processes.

Keywords: metaphor, political style, political discourse, rhetoric
Published online: 10 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.1.05sch
References
Ankersmit, F.R
(1996) Aesthetic politics: Political philosophy beyond fact and value. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle
(1984) The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation. [Edited by J. Barnes]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press..Google Scholar
Austin, J.L
(1962) How to do things with words. [Edited by J.O. Urmson & M. Sbisà] (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Black, M
(1954) Metaphor. The Aristotelian Society, 551, 273–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carey, C
(1996) Rhetorical means of persuasion. In A. Oksenberg Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s rhetoric. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J
(2005) Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Metaphor and political communication. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourse (pp. 97–115). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Forensic deliberations on “purposeful metaphor.” Metaphor and the Social World, 2(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Analysing political speeches. Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R
(2002) Introduction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 1–38). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eco, U
(1983) The scandal of metaphor: Metaphorology and semiotics. Poetics Today, 4(2), 217–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontana, B., Nederman, C.J., & Remer, G
(2004) Introduction: Deliberative democracy and the rhetorical turn. In B. Fontana, C.J. Nederman & G. Remer (Eds.), Talking democracy: Historical perspectives on rhetoric and democracy (pp. 1–25). University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frede, D
(1992) The cognitive role of phantasia in Aristotle. In M.C. Nussbaum & A. Oksenberg Rorty (Eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s de anima. [Kindle version] (Chapter 15). Retrieved from: [URL]
Friedman, T.L
(2014) Putin and the laws of gravity. New York Times, A23. New York.Google Scholar
Garsten, B
(2006) Saving persuasion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B.F., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C
(2001) Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K.J. Holoyoak & B.N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Jr
(2011) Are “deliberate” metaphors really deliberate?: A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 26–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirby, J.T
(1997) Aristotle on metaphor. The American Journal of Philology, 118(4), 517–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopan, Ta
(2014) Tom Perkins apologizes for “Kristalnacht.” Politico. Retrieved February 16, 2014, from [URL]Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G
(2004) Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
(2008) The neural theory of metaphor. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Afterword. In G. Lakoff & M. Johnson (Eds.), Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.) (pp. 243–276). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahon, J.E
(1999) Getting your sources right: What Aristotle didn’t say. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 69–80). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J
(2013) Politics and rhetoric: A critical introduction. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Night of broken metaphors
(2014) The Economist. Retrieved from [URL]
Nussbaum, M.C
(1996) Aristotle on emotions and rational persuasion. In A. Oksenberg Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s rhetoric (pp. 303–323). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C., & Putnam, H
(1992) Changing Aristotle’s mind. In M.C. Nussbaum & A. Oksenberg Rorty (Eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s de anima. [Kindle version] (Chapter 3). Retrieved from: [URL]
Oksenberg Rorty, A
(1996) Structuring rhetoric. In A. Oksenberg Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s rhetoric (pp. 1–33). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ortony, A
(1993) Metaphor, language and thought. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–16). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perkins, T
(2014) Progressive Kristalnacht coming? Wall Street Journal, (January 24th).Google Scholar
Postma, T
(2011) Metaphor and register variation: The personalization of Dutch news discourse. Doctoral dissertation, VU University, Amsterdam. Retrieved from: [URL]
Richards, I.A
(1936) The Philosophy of rhetoric. Controversies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P
(1975 [2003]) The rule of metaphor. The creation of meaning in language (1975, R. Czerny et al., trans.). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q
(1969) Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), 3–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 231, 213–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The end of the oil age
(2003) The Economist. Retrieved from [URL]
Wilders, G
(2012) Join our protest against the profiteering eurocrats. Retrieved June 24, 2014, from [URL]
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Schoor, Carola
2017. In the theater of political style: Touches of populism, pluralism and elitism in speeches of politicians. Discourse & Society 28:6 ► pp. 657 ff. DOI logo
Tayebipour, Meysam
2023. Theoretical Frameworks. In Ayatollah Khomeini Through the Lens of the Iran-Iraq War [Studies in Iranian Politics, ], ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Slowing Metaphor Down [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 26], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.