MacArthur questions the use of the “Macmillan Dictionary” in metaphor identification. In this response, I argue that the ideal way of determining basic meaning is by analysis of concordance citations sampled from an appropriate corpus. This is demonstrated using a 1000 word sample of the concordance for say and its inflections, taken from the “British National Corpus”. It is shown that it is very difficult to identify separable senses, which calls into question whether say is actually a realisation of a mapping from writing to speaking. A dictionary developed on corpus principles is a good alternative to using corpus data directly. It is argued that learners’ dictionaries are more suitable than native speaker dictionaries for this purpose.
Burns, A., & Coffin, C. (Eds.). (2001). Analysing English in a global context. London: Routledge.
Hanks, P. (2008). The lexicographical legacy of John Sinclair. International Journal of Lexicography, 21(3), 219–229.
Hanks, P. (2012). The corpus revolution in lexicography. International Journal of Lexicography, 25(4), 298–436.
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketchengine: 10 years on. Lexicography1(1), 7–36.
Krennmayr, T. (2008). Using dictionaries in linguistic metaphor identification. In N.-L. Johannesson & D.C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp. 97–115). Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.
Leech, G., Rayson, P., & Wilson, A. (2001) Word frequencies in written and spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. London: Longman.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Sinclair, J. (Ed.). (1987). Looking up: An account of the COBUILD project in lexical computing. London: Collins ELT.
Steen, G.J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 23(4), 213–241.
Esbrí-Blasco, Montserrat & Ignasi Navarro i Ferrando
2023. Thematic role mappings in metaphor variation: contrasting Englishbakeand Spanishhornear. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Julich-Warpakowski, Nina & Paula Pérez Sobrino
2023. Introduction. Metaphor and the Social World 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bosman, Nerina & Elsabé Taljard
2021. A Cross-Linguistic Study of BLOOD Metaphors in Afrikaans and Northern Sotho. Language Matters 52:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Kalinin, Oleg
2021. Comparative Analysis of Coronavirus Metaphoric Representation in Chinese and Russian Online Media. Acta Linguistica Asiatica 11:2 ► pp. 51 ff.
2021. Metaphorical Representation of the Media Image of the Armed Forces (by the Example of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army). Philology. Theory & Practice 14:12 ► pp. 4005 ff.
Skoufaki, Sophia & Bojana Petrić
2021. Exploring polysemy in the Academic Vocabulary List: A lexicographic approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 54 ► pp. 101038 ff.
Wang, Ben Pin-Yun, Xiaofei Lu, Chan-Chia Hsu, Eric Po-Chung Lin & Haiyang Ai
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.