Metaphors for ‘good’ and ‘bad’ deaths
A health professional view
This paper discusses the metaphors used by sixteen palliative healthcare professionals from around the United Kingdom in semi-structured interviews to describe what they see as ‘good’ and ‘bad’ deaths. The interviews, conducted for the large-scale “Metaphor in End-of-Life Care” project, are set against the background of contemporary practices and discourses around end-of-life care, dying and quality of death. To date, the use of metaphor in descriptions of different types of deaths has not received much attention. Applying the Metaphor Identification Procedure (Pragglejaz Group, 2007) we find that the difference between good and bad deaths is partly expressed via different frequencies of contrasting metaphors, such as ‘peacefulness’ and ‘openness’ as opposed to ‘struggle’ and ‘pushing away’ professional help. We show how metaphors are used to: evaluate deaths and the dying; justify those evaluations; present a remarkably consistent view of different types of deaths; and promote a particular ‘framing’ of a good death, which is closely linked with the dominant sociocultural and professional contexts of our interviewees. We discuss the implications of these consistent evaluations and framings in broader end-of-life care contexts, and reflect on the significance of our findings for the role of metaphor in communication about sensitive experiences.
Keywords: end-of-life care, death and dying, metaphor, good death, medical communication, hospices
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 12 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.1.01dem
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.1.01dem
References
Bennett, A
(2013)
We need a heroic narrative for death
. Paper presented at
the TEDMED
. Retrieved from: https://www.ted.com/talks/amanda_bennett_a_heroic_narrative_for_letting_go?language=en
Cameron, L
in press). Using metaphor for peace-building, empathy, and reconciliation. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.) The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language Chapter 29 Abingdon Routledge
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., & Low, G
Canter, D
Carpentier, N., & Van Brussel, L
Cipolletta, S., & Oprandi, N
Costello, J
Cottrell, L., & Duggleby, W
Czechmeister, C.A
Deignan, A
Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., & Semino, E
Gibbs, R.W., Leggitt, J.S., & Turner, E.A
EAPC
(2013) The Prague charter. Retrieved from: https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/The_Prague_Charter_Relieving_suffering
Kelly, C.M.J
Kövecses, Z
Lakoff, G
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M
Low, J.T.S., & Payne, S.A
Maalej, Z
Ortony, A., & Fainsilber, L
Payne, S.A., Langley-Evans, A., & Hiller, R
Pragglejaz Group
Reisfield, G.M., & Wilson, G.R
Scarre, G
Seale, C
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Koller, V
Seymour, J.E., Bellamy, G., Gott, M., Ahmedzai, S.H., & Clark, D
Steen, G., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J.B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T
Steinhauser, K.E., Clipp, E.C., McNeilly, M., Christakis, N.A., McIntyre, L.M., & Tulsky, J.A
Thibodeau, P.H., & Boroditsky, L
Van Brussel, L., & Carpentier, N
Vig, E.K., Nathaniel, A.D., & Pearlman, R.A
Full-text
Cited by
Cited by 14 other publications
Abaalalaa, Hessah Shajaan & Wesam M. A. Ibrahim
Atanasova, Dimitrinka
Castaño, Emilia
Cotter, Colleen, Danniella Samos & Deborah Swinglehurst
DAVID, OANA & TEENIE MATLOCK
Duckett, Stephen
Efeoğlu Özcan, Esranur
Lai, Huei-ling & Yi-chen Chen
Lang, Alexander
Macagno, Fabrizio & Maria Grazia Rossi
Miller-Lewis, Lauren R., Trent W. Lewis, Jennifer Tieman, Deb Rawlings, Deborah Parker, Christine R. Sanderson & Christopher M. Danforth
Peters, Joachim, Natalie Dykes, Mechthild Habermann, Christoph Ostgathe & Maria Heckel
Potts, Amanda & Elena Semino
Skrynnikova, Inna V.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.