Article published In:
Metaphor in Religion and SpiritualityEdited by Stephen Pihlaja
[Metaphor and the Social World 7:1] 2017
► pp. 47–65
Edited by Stephen Pihlaja
[Metaphor and the Social World 7:1] 2017
► pp. 47–65
An investigation of the blocking and development of empathy in discussions between Muslim and Christian believers
This article investigates examples of the blocking or development of empathy in videoed discussions between three pairs of conservative Muslim and Christian believers. The analysis focusses on the use of figurative language in the discussions with the aim of identifying examples of metaphor appropriation, and reveals three types of shared metaphor usage. The first is shared language based on the overlapping semantic fields that Christians and Muslims draw on in order to describe their experience. The second consists of appropriation that appears to contribute to the blocking of empathy through the imposition of narratives with specific assumptions. The third involves discourse convergence and empathy development, demonstrating the potential of this type of discourse format to promote bridge building between particular individuals at specific moments in a discourse.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Interacting, perspective taking, and metaphor usage
- 3.Method
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Examples of shared language
- 4.2Appropriating metaphors and imposing personal stories in order to challenge perspectives
- 4.3Empathy in statements that adopt the perspective of the Other
- 4.4Moments of perspective alignment
- 5.Conclusion
-
References
References
Bhaktin, M. M.
(2006) The problem of speech genres. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader, 2nd Edition (pp. 98–107). Abington: Routledge.
Cameron, L.
(2011) Metaphor and reconciliation: The discourse dynamics of empathy in post-conflict conversations. New York: Taylor Francis.
(2010) The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (eds.) Metaphor analysis: Research practices in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox. pp. 77–96.
Cameron, L., Low, G. D., & Maslen, R.
(2010) Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practices in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 116–146). London: Equinox.
Clifford, A.
Deignan, A., Littlemore, J. & Semino, E.
(2013) Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, N.
(2003) Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. 
Gavins, J.
(2007) Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gibbs, Jr. R. W., & Colston, H. L.
(2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoffman, M. L.
(2000) Empathy and moral development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
(2008) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Linell, P.
(2009) Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Macmillan Dictionary
(2009–2015) [URL] Macmillan Publishers Limited (accessed February 2015).
Musolff, A.
(2004) Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Naik, Z.
(2008) Concept of God in major religions. Birmingham: Islamic Dawah Centre International.
Neary, C.
(2017) “Truth is like a vast tree”: metaphor use in Gandhi’s autobiographical narration. Metaphor and the Social World, 7(1), 106–125.
Paltridge, B.
(2006) Discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Pihlaja, S.
(2014) Antagonism on YouTube. London: Bloomsbury.
Richardson, P.
(2015) Violence, belief, and viewpoint: A cognitive poetic analysis of fictional narratives relating to radical Islam. Media and Communication Studies (Hokkaido University), 681, 23–56.
(2013) A closer walk: A cognitive linguistic study of movement and proximity metaphors and their impact on certainty in Muslim and Christian language. University of Birmingham Ethesis. [URL]
(2012) A closer walk: A study of the interaction between metaphors related to movement and proximity and presuppositions about the reality of belief in Christian and Muslim testimonials. Metaphor and the Social World, 2(2), 233–261.
Sacks, H.
(2004) An initial characterization of the organization of speaker turn-taking in conversation. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 35–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Semino, E., Deignan, A., & Littlemore, J.
(2013) Metaphor, genre and recontexualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 41–59.
Stockwell, P.
(2002) Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.
Tausch, N. & Hewstone, M.
(2013) Intergroup contact. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A.
(2014) Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid & Hooshang Khoshsima
2021. Homo-schematic Metaphors: A Study of Metaphor Comprehension in Three Different Priming Conditions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50:4 ► pp. 923 ff. 
RICHARDSON, PETER & CHARLES M. MUELLER
2019. Moving yet being still: exploring source domain reversal and force in explanations of enlightenment. Language and Cognition 11:2 ► pp. 310 ff.
Richardson, Peter & Charles M. Mueller
Richardson, Peter & Miori Nagashima
2018. Perceptions of danger and co-occurring metaphors in Buddhist dhamma talks and Christian sermons. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.