Cover not available
Introduction In:
Evolution and Revolution in Language and Linguistics
Edited by Janine Berns, Marie Steffens and Esther Baiwir
[Nota Bene 1:1] 2024
► pp. 3–13
Introduction

Evolution and revolution in language and linguistics

 | Radboud University
 | Utrecht University | Liège University
 | Liège University
The first issue of Nota BeNe explores the phenomena of evolution and revolution in language science and in language use. Linguistics has evolved over time, making it the versatile discipline it is today, and the field should continue to remain open to new perspectives and critically consider old habits and new approaches. Revolution, peaceful or violent, may emerge when it comes to questions of language, power and identity. The four thematic contributions in this volume discuss questions of evolution and revolution from different angles: by investigating attitudes on language change expressed in Austrian newspapers, by considering Francophone Belgian pupils’ performances in a popular national dictation contest, by unravelling the various denominations used in different domains to refer collectively to Canada’s First Nations, and by discussing to what extent a Dynamic Approach to language could be a more beneficial approach than the commonly adopted static perspective.
Keywords: language variation, language change, language ideologies, approaches to language
Article outline
  • 1.Reflections of evolution and revolution
    • 1.1Evolution
    • 1.2Revolution
  • 2.Overview of the contributions
  • Note
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (27)
References
Aalberse, Suzanne, Ad Backus & Pieter Muysken. 2019. Heritage languages: A language contact approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ball, Rodney. 1999. Spelling reform in France and Germany: Attitudes and reactions. Current Issues in Language & Society 6(3–4). 276–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1983. Broadcast news as a language standard. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 401. 29–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2003. The history of linguistics. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (eds.), The handbook of linguistics, 81–104. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2003. Origins of language. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (eds.), The handbook of linguistics, 1–18. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve. V. 2003. First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2006. Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language. The standing challenge of grammar writing, 207–234. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.). 2001. Can threatened languages be saved? (Multilingual Matters). Bristol: Blue Ridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fónagy, Ivan (M). 2006. Dynamique et changement [Dynamics and change]. Louvain: Peeters Publishers.Google Scholar
Han, ZhaoHong & Larry Selinker, Larry. 2005. Fossilization in L2 learners. In Eli Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 455–470. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hjelde, Arnstein & Benthe Kolberg Jansson. 2016. Language reforms in Norway and their acceptance and use in the Norwegian-American community. In Guri Ellen Barstad, Arnstein Hjelde, Sigmund Kvam, Anastasia Parianou & John Todd (eds.), Language and nation: Crossroads and connections, 297–314. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Hogan-Brun, Gabrielle & Bernadette O’Rourke (eds.). 2019. The Palgrave handbook of minority languages and communities. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphries, Emma. 2019. #JeSuisCirconflexe: The French spelling reform of 1990 and 2016 reactions. Journal of French Language Studies 29(3). 305–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2007. Minority language movements. In Monica Heller (ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach, 50–70. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karunyk, Kateryna. (2017). The Ukrainian spelling reforms, half-reforms, non-reforms and anti-reforms as manifestation of the Soviet language policy. Studi Slavistici, 14(1), 91–110.Google Scholar
Kidd, Evan & Seamus Donnelly. 2020. Individual differences in first language acquisition. Annual Review of Linguistics 6(1). 319–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972a. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1(1). 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1972b. The social setting of linguistic change. In Labov, William (ed), Sociolinguistic patterns, 260–325. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of linguistic change. Volume 2: Social factors. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2014. Language evolution. In N. J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman & Jack Sidnell (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 309–324. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Litosseliti, Lia. 2018. Introducing research methods in linguistics. In Lia Litosseliti (ed.), Research methods in linguistics. 2nd edition, 1–19. London/New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2017. First language acquisition. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (eds.), The handbook of linguistics (2nd edition), 397–413. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James. 2001. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(4). 530–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plato (translated by Benjamin Jowett). Cratylus. E-Book #1616, released 1999, most recently updated April 27, 2022. Available through The Gutenberg Project, [URL]
Reyes, Antonio. 2013. Don’t touch my language: attitudes toward institutional language reforms. Current Issues in Language Planning 14(2). 337–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. IRAL 10(3). 209–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, Larry & John T. Lamendella. 1978. Two perspectives on fossilization in interlanguage learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 3(2). 143–191.Google Scholar