Cover not available
Article published In:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 28:2 (2018) ► pp.346–372

Ecological landscape in narrative thought

How siege survivors employ prepositions to make sense of war-torn Sarajevo

| Pratt Institute
| Pratt Institute
This study explores how 16 individuals who grew up during the four-year long military siege of the city employ language to make sense of their everyday experiences in Sarajevo following the conclusion of the Bosnian War. Narrative inquiry is employed in this work to study sense-making, a psychological process based in language and situated in interaction with extant social and physical landscapes. During the study, participants wrote responses across the three narrative contexts (1) the prewar, (2) the acute war, and (3) the postwar. Data analyses examine how participants enact ecological landscape in narrative construction through varied use of prepositions across the three narrative contexts. Significantly higher use of prepositions in the acute war narrative context indicates that growing up amidst urban destruction gives rise to thought processes that draw on spatial and temporal relations in order to make sense of radical environmental changes in the landscape of war.
Keywords: sense-making, youth, Sarajevo, Bosnia, siege, war, urban destruction, prepositions, environmental affordances, environmental psychology
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Theory: Narrative as a tool for making sense of the world
  • Unit of analysis: Prepositions
  • Method: Dynamic storytelling
  • Context: Sarajevo during the siege
  • Analyses
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17076.luc
References (69)
References
Ball, P., Tabeau, E., & Verwimp, P. (2007). The Bosnian book of the dead: Assessment of the database: Executive summary. Human losses in Bosnia and Herzegovina 91–95. Sarajevo: Research and Documentation Center. [URL].
Bamberg, M. (2004). Talk, small stories, and adolescent identities. Human Development, 471, 366–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Narrative analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 21; pp. 85–102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Balaban, F. P. (1983). Funkcional’naja značimost predloga. Kišinev.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, C. (27 May 1994). Final report of the United Nations Commission of Experts established pursuant to security council resolution 780. United Nations. Archived from the original on 22 February 2001. Retrieved 13 March 2018.Google Scholar
Berman, D. (2001). The Heroes of Treca Gimnazija: A War School in Sarajevo, 1992–1995. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (1998). The ecology of developmental process. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.) (5th ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development, (Vol. 11; pp. 993–1028) New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1984). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: The hidden agenda. New Directions for Child Development, 231, 93–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). Life as Narrative. Social Research, 54(1), 11–32.Google Scholar
(2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 421, 33–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S., & Haste, H. (1987). Introduction. In by J. S. Bruner, & H. Haste (Eds.), Making Sense: The Child’s Construction of the World (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., & Postman, L. (1949). On the Perception of Incongruity: A Paradigm. Journal of Personality, 181, 206–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bugarski, R. (1969). Symmetry and Asymmetry in Prepositional Systems. In Zbornik radova povodom četrdesetogodišnjice osnivanja Katedre za engleski jezik i književnost (pp. 57–69). Beograd: Filološki fakultet.Google Scholar
(1973). A System of English Prepositions and Their Serbo-Croatian Equivalents. In Filipović, R. (Ed.), The Yugoslav Serbo-Croatian-English Contrastive Project (pp. 3–20). Zagreb: Institute of Linguistics and Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistcs. Reports 8.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1996). The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: Cognitive vs. linguistic determinants. In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1944). An Essay on Man. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. J. (1989). Spatial cognition and the semantics of prepositions in English, Polish, and Russian. Munich, Germany: Verlag Otto Sagner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. (1973). Space, Time, Semantics, and the Child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (27–64). New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daiute, C. (2010). Human development and political violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). “Trouble” in, around, and between narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 21(2), 329–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Narrative inquiry: A dynamic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daiute, C., & Lucić, L. (2010). Situated cultural development among youth separated by war. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 341, 615–628. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daiute, C., & Nelson, K. (1997). Making sense of the sense-making function of narrative evaluation. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 207–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
FAMA, (1993). Sarajevo Survival Guide, W. A. Razovic, Maja (Ed.). Croatia: Workman Publishing.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1971). Some problems for case grammar. In R. J. O’Brien (Ed.), 22nd annual Round Table. Linguistics: developments of the sixties – viewpoints of the seventies, volume 24 of Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics (pp. 35–56). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces. Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.). Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Halilović, J. (2013). War Childhood. Sarajevo: War Childhood Museum.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2006). Space as a Keyword. In N. Castree, & G. Derek (Eds.), David Harvey: a critical reader (pp. 67–82). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heft, H. (1989). Affordances and the Body: An Intentional Analysis of Gibson’s Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 191, 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Affordances, dynamic experience, and the challenge of reification. Ecological Psychology, 151, 149–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jabučar, A. (1994) Organizacija škola u ratu [Organization of schools during the war time]. Bosansko-hercegovački školski glasnik, 1(1) (August), 4–5.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1977). X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, J., & Slobin, D. (1979). The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. Journal of Child Language, 61, 529–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karavelić, V. & Rujanac, Z. (2009). Sarajevo: Opsada i Odbrana 1992–1995 [Sarajevo: Siege and Defense]. Udruženje za zaštitu tekovina borbe za Bosnu i Hercegovinu. Sarajevo, Bosnia and Hercegovina.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Landau, B. (1994). Where’s what and what’s where: the language of objects in space. The Acquisition of the Lexicon eds Gleitman, L., Landau, B., editors. (London: MIT Press;) 259–296.Google Scholar
Landis, J. R., Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 331, 159–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 11). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell PublishersGoogle Scholar
Lewin, K. (1917). Kriegslandschaft [War landscapes]. Zeitschrift für angewandte psychologie. [Journal for applied Psychology], 121, 440–447.Google Scholar
Lucić, L. (2016). Developmental affordances of war-torn landscapes: Growing up in Sarajevo under siege. Human Development, 591, 81–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maček, I. (2009). Sarajevo under Siege: Anthropology in Wartime. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meints, K., Plunkett, K., Harris, P. L., & Dimmock, D. (2002). What is ‘on’ and ‘under’ for 15-, 18- and 24- month-olds? Typicality effects in early comprehension of spatial prepositions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 201, 113–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muchow, M. & Muchow, H. H. (2015). The Life Space of the Urban Child. In G. Mey & H. Guenther (Eds.), The life space of the urban child: Perspectives on Martha Muchow’s classic study (Guenther, Trans., pp. 63–146) (Series History and Theory of Psychology). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (original published in 1935).Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1985). Making Sense: The Acquisition of Shared Meaning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1996). Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Young minds in social worlds. Cambridge: Harvard Univesity Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). A Matter of Meaning: Reflections on Forty Years of JCL. Journal of Child Language, 41(1), 93–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nachtigäller, K., Rohlfing, K. J., & McGregor, K. K. (2013). A story about a word: does narrative presentation promote learning of a spatial preposition in German two-year olds? J. Child Lang, 401, 900–917. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. New York: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pilav, A., (2012). Before the War, War, After the War: Urban Imageries for Urban Resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 3(1), 23–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohlfing, K. J. (2001). No preposition required. The role of prepositions for the understanding of spatial relations in language acquisition. In M. Putz, S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition (pp. 229–47). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Facilitating the acquisition of UNDER by means of IN and ON a training study in Polish. J. Child Lang, 331, 51–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinha, C. (1983). Background knowledge, presupposition and canonicality. In T. Seiler & W. Wannenmacher (Eds.), Concept development and the development of word meaning (pp. 269–96). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (1993). Prepositions: Patterns of polysemization and strategies of disambiguation. In C. Zelinsk-Wibbelt (Eds.), Natural language processing: The semantics of prepositions (Vol. 31) (pp. 151–175). The Hague: Mouten de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pranjković, I. (2001). Gramatika hrvatskoga jezika [Croatian Grammar]. Zagreb: Skolska KnjigaGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Young, K. (2001). UNHCR and ICRC in the former Yugoslavia: Bosnia-Herzegovina. International Review of the Red Cross, 8431, 781–805.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. & Palermo, D. S. (1974). ‘In’, ‘on’, and ‘under’ revisited. Cognition, 31, 245–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winkel, G., Saegert, S., & Evans, G. W. (2009). An ecological perspective on theory, methods, and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 318–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Zunshine, L. (2006). Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Lucić, Luka
2021. War Schools: teaching innovations implemented across makeshift educational spaces during the military siege of Sarajevo. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 29:4 ► pp. 573 ff. DOI logo
Strasser, Irene & Martin Dege
2021. Crises, Politics, Psychology—An Introduction. In The Psychology of Global Crises and Crisis Politics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Laura G.E., Laura Wakeford, Timothy F. Cribbin, Julie Barnett & Wai Kai Hou
2020. Detecting psychological change through mobilizing interactions and changes in extremist linguistic style. Computers in Human Behavior 108 ► pp. 106298 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.