Cover not available
Article published In:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 29:1 (2019) ► pp.82–98

Stability of hidden stories

| University of Social Sciences and Humanities
| The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
| The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
We refer to the concept of the hidden story as a story about one’s own life, internalized in the mind and knowable “indirectly”, through a monologue and inference, using linguistic and literary theory tools. The aim of the study was to determine whether the hidden story thus reconstructed would be stable in time. A twenty-one-year-old woman was asked to deliver a ten-minute monologue on her upbringing. After two years the test was repeated. Both monologues were transcribed, analyzed and interpreted to isolate a hidden story from each of them. We reconstructed the earlier and later stories. Two threads: “rebellion” and “heritage” appeared in both stories, but they combined to form a more coherent narrative only in the later one. The “closeness with parents” thread, present in the earlier story, was replaced with the “marital love” thread. The character and pattern of the changes illustrate changes that result from developmental factors.
Keywords: monologues, hidden stories, time stability
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • Hidden stories
    • Stability of hidden stories
  • Method
    • The research participant
    • Procedure for isolating hidden stories from monologues
  • Results
    • Summary of the analysis and interpretation of Monologue 1
      • Motifs identified on the basis of content analysis
      • Motifs identified on the basis of the way of speaking analysis
      • Narrative schema of the story
    • Summary of the analysis and interpretation of Monologue 2
      • Motifs identified on the basis of content analysis
      • Motifs identified on the basis of the way of speaking analysis
      • Narrative schema of the story
    • Comparison of stories isolated from Monologues 1 and 2
  • Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17080.kun
References (34)
References
Aleksandrowicz, J. (2000). Psychoterapia. [Psychotherapy]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL.Google Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beck, A. T. (1979). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York, NY: Meridian.Google Scholar
Booth, W. C. (1983). The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691–710.Google Scholar
Brzezińska, A. (2000). Społeczna psychologia rozwoju. [Social psychology of development]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.Google Scholar
Greenberg, L., & Malcolm, W. (2002). Resolving unfinished business: Relating process to outcome. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 406–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, N. (1967). Forms of plot. In Ph. Stevick (Ed.), The theory of the novel (pp. 141–145). New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology (Special Issue: Culture and the dialogical self: Theory, Method and Practice), 7(3), 243–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: Update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuncewicz, D., & Kuncewicz, D. (2019). Hidden stories in monologues. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research (FQS), 20(1), Art. 9.Google Scholar
Kuncewicz, D., Kuncewicz, D., Sokołowska, E., & Kruszewski, W. (2016). Rzetelność procedury wyodrębniania opowieści ukrytych z monologów. [Reliability of procedure for isolating hidden stories from monologues]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 59(4), 351–366.Google Scholar
Kuncewicz, D., Kuncewicz, D., Sokołowska, E., & Sobkowicz, J. (2015). What are you saying when you are talking about…? Procedure for isolating a hidden story in a monologue about the author`s own life. Polish Journal of Applied Psychology, 13(2), 25–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuncewicz, D., Sokołowska, E., & Sobkowicz, J. (2014). Which literary theory tools can a psychologist use for interpreting language communication? Polish Journal of Applied Psychology, 12(4), 71–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Library of Congress, & Billington, J. H. (2010). Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1998). Understanding transference: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme method. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markiewicz, H. (1984). Wymiary dzieła literackiego. [Dimensions of a literary work]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York, NY: Morrow.Google Scholar
Morgan, A. (2000). What is narrative therapy? An easy-to read introduction. Adelaide, S. Aust: Dulwich Centre Publications.Google Scholar
Okopień-Sławińska, A. (2001). Semantyka wypowiedzi poetyckiej. [Semantics of poetic expression]. Kraków: Universitas.Google Scholar
Ong, W. J. (2011). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word. New York, NY: Rooutlege.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1923/2001). The language and thought of the child. London & New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
Salvatore, G., Dimaggio, G. A., & Semerari, A. (2004). A model of narrative development: Implications for understanding psychopathology and guiding therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 771, 231–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an Inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sills, C., Fish, S., & Lapworth, P. (1995). Gestalt Counselling. Oxford: Speechmark Publishing.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction (3rd ed). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sławiński, J. (2010). Opowieść [Story]. In J. Sławiński (Ed.), Dictionary of literary terms (p. 359). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Stemplewska-Żakowicz, K. (2002). Koncepcje narracyjnej tożsamości. Od historii życia do dialogowego „ja”. [Concepts of narrative identity. From the story of life to the dialogical “self”], In J. Trzebiński (Ed.), Narracja jako sposób rozumienia świata. [Narration as a way of understanding the world] (pp. 81–113). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Towarzystwo Psychologiczne.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Hojjat, M., & Barnes, M. L. (2001). Empirical tests of aspects of a theory of love as a story. European Journal of Personality, 151, 199–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Summers, R. F., & Barber, J. P. (2009). Psychodynamic Therapy. A guide to evidence-based practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. S. (1979). Script theory: differential magnification of affects. In H. E. Howe, Jr., and R. A. Dienstiber (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium On Motivation, Vol. 261 (pp. 201–236). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Trzebiński, J. (1998). Self-narratives as sources of motivation. Psychology of Language and Communication, 2(1), 13–22.Google Scholar
White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York, NY: WW Norton.Google Scholar