Cover not available
Article published In:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 30:2 (2020) ► pp.364–380

Rendering the untellable, tellable

The cooperative work of face in conversational storytelling

| The University of Kansas
Goffman’s concepts of face and face work, and his assertion that talk in face-to-face interaction is cooperative, are undertheorized and often critiqued. In an attempt to expand on these concepts, excerpts are analyzed from a single-teller narrative which evolves into a 13-minute conversational story about the relationship troubles of an absent third party. Analyzed for the verbal and nonverbal disruptions and subsequent adjustments and remedial actions manifested by participants, Conversation Analysis (CA) is employed to capture how threats to face surface and how they are recognized, cooperatively managed, and made tellable. Through the analysis, this paper addresses the perceived incommensurability between CA and Goffman’s notion of face, demonstrating the ways in which face is (1) a doing a doing, a situated presentation of self that serves narrative-advancing functions and renders talk tellable as threats to face arise and (2) an achievement comprised of moves that are tacitly cooperative, ambiguously cooperative, or uncooperatively cooperative.
Keywords: face, face work, cooperation, Goffman, conversation analysis, conversational storytelling, girl talk, non-native speaker, tellability, Schegloff
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Unpacking Goffman’s Face
  • Rendering the untellable, tellable
  • Tacitly cooperative moves
  • Ambiguously cooperative moves
  • Cooperatively, uncooperative moves
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Transcription notation
  • References
Published online: 19 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18055.tho
References (35)
References
Arundale, R. B. (2009). Face as emergent in interpersonal communication: An alternative to Goffman. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & M. Haugh (Eds.), Face, communication and social interaction (pp. 33–54). London, UK: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Bischoping, K., & Gao, Z. (2017). Story sequencing and strereotyping: A case study from talk about the crowded buses of China. Narrative Inquiry, 27(1), 85–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. (1993). Prosodic and functional units of language. In J. Edwards & M. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 33–43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Coupland, J., & Jaworski, A. (2003). Transgression and intimacy in recreational talk narratives. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(1), 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2007). Small stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
(1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Guendouzi, J. (2001). You’ll think we’re always bitching: The functions of cooperativity and competition in women’s gossip. Discourse Studies 31, 29–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M., & Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2010). Face in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 2073–2077. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (2009). Conversation analysis as social theory. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 300–320). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, A., & Coupland, J. (2005). Othering in gossip: “You go out you have a laugh and you can pull yeah okay but like…”. Language in Society, 341, 667–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1984). On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J. M. Atkinson & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies of conversation analysis (pp. 191–222). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 152–205). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Prior, M. T. (2015). Analyzing storytelling in TESOL interview research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 226–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, C. (2008). Developing feminist conversation analysis: A response to Wowk. Human Studies, 311,179–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, G. (1996). Finding “face” in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(4), 303–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, D. (2008). Kinds of conversational cooperation. Journal of Pragmatics, 401, 1896–1908. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohammad, A., & Vásquez, C. (2015). “Rachel’s not here”: Constructed dialogue in gossip. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(3), 351–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monzoni, C. M., & Drew, P. (2009). Inter-actional contexts of story – interventions by non-knowledgeable story recipients in (Italian) multi-person interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 411, 197–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (2000). Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2012). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Chichester, UK: Blackwell Publishing LTD. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruhi, S. (2009). Evoking face in self and other-presentation in Turkish. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & M. Haugh (Eds.), Face, communication and social interaction (pp. 155–174). London, UK: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 89–135). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
(1988/1989). From interview to confrontation: Observations of the Bush/Rather encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 221, 215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997). “Narrative analysis” thirty years later. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 97–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 391, 462–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, C. M., & Larkin, D. (1999). Peanuts: A golden celebration. The art and the story of the world’s best-loved comic strip. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., & Timmermans, S. (2017). Always look on the bright side of life: Making bad news bivalent, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(4), 404–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svennevig, J., & Skovholt, K. (2005, July 10–15). The methodology of conversation analysis – positivism or social constructivism? Paper presented at the 9th International Pragmatics Conference, Riva del Garda, Italy.
Vargas Maseda, R. (2017). Deciphering Goffman: The structure of his sociological theory revisited. London, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Statham, Simon
2021. The year’s work in stylistics 2020. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 30:4 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.