Article published in:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 30:2 (2020) ► pp. 427–450

Storytelling and stance-taking in group interaction

| Sheffield Hallam University
This paper looks at two highly prevalent actions in naturally-occurring talk: stance-taking and storytelling. Stance-taking and storytelling have been shown to co-occur often (e.g. Siromaa, 2012), and this is especially the case in reading group talk, a discursive environment in which speakers are engaged in the joint enterprise of assessing the meaning and quality of a shared object: a written narrative text (e.g. a novel). Insights from conversation analysis and dialogic syntax are used to analyse interactional data from several reading group meetings, with a focus on the types of storytelling that are found in this talk, the relationship between the various stories told in sequence in the talk – including the relationship between the written narrative text and the spoken narratives, and the ways in which stance-taking and storytelling are intertwined.
Keywords: conversation analysis, dialogic syntax, group interaction, second stories, stance, storytelling
Published online: 19 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18078.pep
References

References

Adichie, C. N.
(2013) Americanah. New York: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Allington, D., & Swann, J.
(2009) Researching literary reading as social practice. Language and Literature, 18(3), 219–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anward, J.
(2004) Lexeme recycled. How categories emerge from interaction. Logos and Language, 5(2), 31–46.Google Scholar
Benwell, B.
(2009) ‘A pathetic and racist and awful character’: ethnomethodological approaches to the reception of diasporic fiction. Language and Literature, 18(3), 300–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Common-sense anti-racism in book group talk: the role of reported speech. Discourse & Society, 23(4), 356–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolden, G. B., & Mandelbaum, J.
(2017) The use of conversational co-remembering to corroborate contentious claims. Discourse Studies, 19(1), 3–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J.
(1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chaucer, G.
(2008) The riverside Chaucer (3rd ed.). F. N. Robinson (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, J.
(2001) “My mind is with you”: story sequences in the talk of male friends. Narrative Inquiry, 11(1), 81–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collinson, I.
(2009) Everyday readers: reading and popular culture. London: Equinox. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.
(2007) The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W., & Giora, R.
(2014) From cognitive-functional linguistics to dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 351–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M. H.
(1990) He-Said-She-Said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haddington, P.
(2004) Stance taking in news interviews. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 17, 101–142.Google Scholar
Hartley, J.
(2002) The reading groups book: 2002–2003 edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helisten, M.
(2017) Resumptions as multimodal achievements in conversational (story)tellings. Journal of Pragmatics, 112(1), 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R.
(2008) Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversation (pp. 219–248). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) On the poetics of ordinary talk. Text and Performance Quarterly, 16(1), 1–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kingsolver, B.
(2012) Flight behaviour. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
(1972) Language in the inner city: studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Long, E.
(1992) Textual interpretation as collective action. In J. Boyrain (Ed.), The Ethnography of Reading (pp. 180–211). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Book clubs: women and the uses of reading in everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Literature as a spur to collective action: the diverse perspectives of nineteenth and twentieth-century reading groups. Poetics Today, 25(2), 335–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mills, M.
(1998) The restraint of beasts. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Nir, B., Dori-Hacohen, G., & Maschler, Y.
(2013) Formulations on Israeli talk radio: from actions and sequences to stance via dialogic syntax. Discourse Studies, 16(4), 534–571. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nissi, R.
(2013) Decrypting the text: the construction and function of disagreement in Bible study sessions. Text & Talk, 33(6), 771–791. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N.
(2005) Interactional remembering in conversational narrative. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(11), 1819–1844. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Conversational recipe telling. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2740–2761. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peplow, D.
(2016) Talk about books: a study of reading groups. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Peplow, D., Swann, J., Trimarco, P., & Whiteley, S.
(2016) Reading group discourse: integrating cognitive and sociocultural perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A.
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Procter, J., & Benwell, B.
(2014) Reading across worlds: transnational book groups and the reception of difference. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Radway, J. A.
(1987) Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular culture. London: Verso.Google Scholar
(1997) A feeling for books: the book-of-the-month club, literary taste, and middle-class desire. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Riessmann, C.
(1993) Narrative analysis. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1974) An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. F. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1978) Some technical considerations of a dirty joke. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversation (pp. 249–269). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1–2). G. Jefferson (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sakita, T. I.
(2006) Parallelism in conversation: resonance, schematization, and extension from the perspective of dialogic syntax and cognitive linguistics. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(3), 467–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, M.
(2012) Complaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affect displays. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 387–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siromaa, M.
(2012) Resonance in conversational second stories: a dialogic resource for stance taking. Text and Talk, 32(4), 525–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T.
(2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: when nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svennevig, J.
(2003) Echo answers in native/non-native interaction. Pragmatics, 13(2), 285–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swann, J., & Allington, D.
(2009) Reading groups and the language of literary texts: a case study in social reading. Language and Literature, 18(3), 247–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D.
(1987) Repetition in conversation: towards a poetics of talk. Language, 63(3), 574–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, S.
(2011) Text world theory, real readers and emotional responses to The Remains of the Day. Language and Literature, 20(1), 23–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar