Article published in:
Real Fictions: Fictionality, factuality and narrative strategies in contemporary storytelling
Edited by Sam Browse, Alison Gibbons and Mari Hatavara
[Narrative Inquiry 29:2] 2019
► pp. 245267


Andersson, G.
(2016) The charge against classical and post-classical narratologies’ “Epistemic” approach to literary fiction. In M. Hatavara, M. Hyvärinen, M. Mäkelä, & F. Mäyrä (Eds.), Narrative theory, literature, and new media. Narrative minds and virtual worlds (pp. 50–66). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Andersson, G. & Sandberg, T.
(2018) Sameness versus difference in narratology: Two approaches to narrative fiction. Narrative, 26(3), 241–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, M.
(2014) Narrating moments of political change. In P. Nesbitt-Larking, C. Kinnvall, & T. Capelos (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global political psychology (pp. 353–368). London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L.
(1975) How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ball, J.
(2017) Post-truth: How bullshit conquered the world. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
Banfield, A.
(1982) Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Abingdon/New York: Routledge & Kenan Paul.Google Scholar
Bareis, J. A. & Nordrum, L.
(2015) How to make believe: The fictional truth of representational arts. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bareis, J. A.
(2008) The role of fictionality in narrative theory. In L-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp. 155–175). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.Google Scholar
Bell, A.
(2019) ‘Digital fictionality: Possible worlds theory, ontology, and hyperlinks’. In A. Bell & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Possible worlds theory and contemporary narratology (pp. 249–271). Lincoln/Nebraska: Nebraska University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booth, W. C.
(1983) The rhetoric of fiction (2nd ed.). London: Penguin Books. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Browse, S.
(2017) Between truth, sincerity and satire. In R. van den Akker, A. Gibbons, & T. Vermeulen (Eds.), Metamodernism: Historicity, affect and depth after postmodernism (pp. 167–182). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
in press). Straight talking honest politics: rhetorical style and ethos in the mediated politics of metamodernity. In H. Ringrow & S. Pihlaja Eds. Contemporary media stylistics London Bloomsbury
Bruss, E.
(1976) Autobiographical acts: The changing situation of a literary genre. Baltimore, MA/London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, D.
(1978) Transparent minds. Narrative modes for presenting consciousness in fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Signposts of fictionality: A narratological perspective. Poetics Today, 11(4), 775–804. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The distinction of fiction. Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Colbert, S.
(2006, April 28). Stephen Colbert roasts Bush at Whitehouse correspondent’s dinner. [Video file.] Retrieved from https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=2X93u3anTco
Currie, G.
(1990) The nature of fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Narrative and narrators: A philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Paul
(2015) Ten thesis against fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 74–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Ancona, M.
(2017) Post-truth: The new war on truth and how to fight back. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Davis, E.
(2017) Post-truth: Peak bullshit – and what we can do about it. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Doležel, L.
(1976) Narrative semantics. PTL, 1, 129–151.Google Scholar
(1980) Truth and authenticity in narrative. Poetics Today, 1(3), 7–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Mimesis and possible worlds. Poetics Today, 9(3), 475–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Possible worlds of fiction and history. New Literary History, 29(4), 785–809. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Heterocosmica: Fiction and possible worlds. Baltimore, MA: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.
(2000) New labour, new language? London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Federman, R.
(1981 [1975]) Surfiction – Four propositions in form of an introduction. In R. Federman (Ed.) Surfiction: Fiction now and tomorrow (2nd ed.). Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Felski, R.
(2008) Uses of literature. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetterley, J.
(1978) The Resisting reader. A feminist approach to American fiction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, W.
(2016) “‘Post-truth’ politics and illusory democracy”. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 14(3), 211–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flaxman, S., Sharad, G. & Rao, J. M.
(2016) Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, M.
(1993) The fictions of language and the languages of fiction. The linguistic representation of speech and consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1996) Towards a “natural” narratology. London/New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Genres, text types, or discourse modes? Narrative modalities and generic categorization. Style, 34(2), 274–292.Google Scholar
(2001) Fiction vs. non-fiction: Narratological differentiations. In J. Helbig (Ed.), Erzählen und Erzähltheorie im 20. Jahrhundert. Festschrift für Wilhelm Füger (pp. 85–103). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
(2018) The fiction of the rise of fictionality. Poetics Today, 39(1), 67–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, M. & Nielsen, H. S.
in press). Fictionality Studies from Europe: An Introduction. Arcadia.
Foucault, M.
(1984) Truth and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 51–75). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Frus, P.
(1994) The politics and poetics of journalistic narrative. The timely and the timeless. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, C.
(2006) The rise of fictionality. In F. Moretti (Ed.), The Novel, Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture (pp. 336–363). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) What would Napolean do? Historical, fictional, and counterfactual characters. New Literary History, 42(2), 315–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J.
(2007) Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genette, G.
(1990) Fictional narrative, factual narrative. Poetics Today, 2(4), 755–774. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Fiction & diction, (C. Porter, trans.). Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbons, A.
(2014) Fictionality and ontology. In P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of stylistics (pp. 408–423). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Autonarration, I, and odd address in Ben Lerner’s autofictional novel 10:04 . In A. Gibbons & A. Macrae (Eds.), Pronouns in literature: Positions and perspectives in language (pp. 75–96). London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, D.
(2005) Fiction, theories of. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 163–167). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grishakova, M.
(2008) Literariness, fictionality, and the theory of possible worlds. In L.-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp. 57–76). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.Google Scholar
Hamburger, K.
(1973) The logic of literature. Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hannan, J.
(2018) Trolling ourselves to death? Social media and post-truth politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 214–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, P. K.
(2005) When fact becomes fiction. On extra-textual unreliable narration. In L.-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Fact and fiction in narrative. An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 283–307). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 4, Örebro University.Google Scholar
Harshaw (Hrushovski), B.
(1984) Fictionality and frames of reference: Remarks on a theoretical framework. Poetics Today, 5(2), 227–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harsin, J.
(2015) ‘Regimes of posttruth, post politics and attention economics’. Communication, Culture and Critique, 8, 327–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Post-truth populism: The French anti-gender theory movement and cross-cultural similarities. Communication, culture and Critique, 11, 35–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hatavara, M. & Mildorf, J.
(2017a) Hybrid fictionality and vicarious narrative experience. Narrative, 25(1), 65–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Fictionality, narrative modes, and vicarious storytelling. Style, 51(3), 392–408.Google Scholar
Herman, D.
(2002) Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Introduction. In D. Herman (Ed.), The Emergence of mind. Representations of consciousness in narrative discourse in English (pp. 1–42). Lincoln/London: The University of Nebraska Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyvönen, A-E.
(2018) Careless speech: Conceptualizing post-truth politics. New Perspectives, 26(3), 1–25.Google Scholar
Iser, W.
(1993) The fictive and the imaginary: Charting literary anthropology. Baltimore, MA/ London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ishiguro, K.
(2015) The Buried Giant. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Iversen, S. & Nielsen, H. S.
(2016) The politics of fictionality in documentary form: The act of killing and The ambassador . European Journal of English Studies, 20(3), 249–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, H.
(2006) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly Garrett, R.
(2009) Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among internet users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, R.
(2004) The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. New York: St Martins Press.Google Scholar
Klastrup, L. & Tosca, S.
(2004) Transmedial worlds – Rethinking cyberworld design. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Cyberworlds (2004), 409–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klauk, T. & Köppe, T.
(2014) Fiktonalität: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, N.
(2017) No is not Enough. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Kuhn, M. & Thon, J.-N.
(2017) Transmedial narratology: Current approaches. Narrative, 25(3), 253–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kukkonen, K. & Nielsen, H. S.
(2018) Fictionality: Cognition and exceptionality. Poetics Today 39(3), 473–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lamarque, P. & Olsen, S. H.
(1994) Truth, fiction, and literature. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Lejeune, P.
(1989) On autobiography, (K. Leary, trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. & Cook, J.
(2017) Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 353–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D.
(1983) Truth in fiction. Philosophy Papers, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Löschnigg, M.
(1999) Narratological categories and the (non-)distinction between factual and fictional narratives. In J. Pier (Ed.), Recent trends in narratological research (pp. 31–48), Tours: Presses Universitaires François-Rabelais. Retrieved from http://​books​.openedition​.ord​/pufr​/3946. Crossref
Lubbock, P.
(1921) The craft of fiction. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Mair, J.
(2017) Post-truth anthropology. Anthropology Today, 33(3), 3–4. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McHale, B.
(1978) Free indirect discourse: A survey of recent accounts. Poetics and Theory of Literature, 3, 249–287.Google Scholar
(2016) Afterword: A new normal? In M. Hatavara, M. Hyvärinen, M. Mäkelä, & F. Mäyrä (Eds.), Narrative Theory, Literature, and New Media. Narrative Minds and Virtual Worlds (pp. 295–304). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McIntyre, L.
(2018) Post-truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munoz, J.
(2017) Somatic markers, rhetoric and post-truth. Frontiers in psychology. 8, article 1273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, H. S.
(2010) Natural authors, unnatural narration. In J. Alber & M. Fludernik (Eds.), Postclassical narratology: Approaches and analyses. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Unnatural Narratology, Impersonal Voices, Real Authors, and Non-Communicative Narration. In J. Alber and R. Heinze (Eds.), Unnatural Narratives, Unnatural Narratology (pp. 71–88). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, H. S., Phelan, J., & Walsh, R.
(2015) Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 61–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pariser, E.
(2011) Filter bubbles: What the internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pavel, T.
(1975) ‘Possible worlds in literary semantics’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 34(2), 165–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, M.
(2001) “Getting behind the image”: personality politics in a Labour Party election broadcast. Language and Literature, 10(3), 211–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phelan, J.
(2005) Living to tell about it: A rhetoric and ethics of character narration. Ithaca/ London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(2016) Local fictionality within global non-fiction: Roz Chast’s Why can’t we talk about something more pleasant? . Enthymema, 16, 19–31.Google Scholar
(2017) Fictionality. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 32(2), 235–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Fictionality, audiences, and character: A rhetorical alternative to Catherine Gallagher’s “Rise of fictionality”. Poetics Today, 39(1), 113–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phelan, J. & Nielsen, H. S.
(2017) Why There Are No One-to-One Correspondences among Fictionality, Narrative, and Techniques: A Response to Mari Hatavara and Jarmila Mildorf. Narrative, 25(1), 83–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polletta, F., & Lee, J.
(2006) Is telling stories good for democracy? Rhetoric in public deliberation after 9/11. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 699–723. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, G.
(1991) Narratology, narrative, and meaning. (A. Noble, trans.). Poetics Today, 12(3), 543–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prior, M.
(2013) Media and political polarisation. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Punday, D.
(2010) Five Strands of Fictionality: The Institutional Construction of Contemporary American Fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Ronen, R.
(1994) Possible worlds in literary theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, J. & Hight, C.
(2001) Faking it: Mock-documentary and the subversion of factuality. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, M.-L.
(1980) Fiction, non-factuals, and the principle of minimal departure. Poetics, 9(4), 403–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985) The modal structure of narrative universes. Poetics, 6(4), 717–755. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington/ Indiapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Avatars of story. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Transfictionality across media. In J. Pier & J. Á. García Landa (Eds.), Theorizing Narrativity (pp. 387–417). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, J.-M.
(2010) Why fiction? (D. Cohn, trans.). Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Fictional vs. factual narration. In P. Hühn, J. C. Meister, J. Pier, & W. Schmid (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. Retrieved from http://​www​.lhn​.uni​-hamburg​.de​/article​/fictional​-vs​-factual​-narration
Searle, J. R.
(1975) The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6(2), 319–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P.
(2003) On the discourse of satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humour. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skalin, L-Å.
(2008) “Telling a story”. Reflections on fictional and non-fictional narratives. In L.-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp. 201–260). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
(1986) Relevance, communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spolsky, E.
(2015) The contracts of fiction: Cognition, culture, community. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tallis, B.
(2016) Living in post-truth: Power/knowledge/responsibility. New Perspectives, 24(1), 7–18.Google Scholar
Tompkins, J. P.
(1980) (Ed.) Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism. Baltimore, MA/London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
van den Akker, R., Gibbons, A., & Vermeulen, T.
(2017) (Eds.), Metamodernism: Historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, T.
(2015) The New “Depthiness”. E.Flux 61. Retrieved from http://​www​.e​-flux​.com​/journal​/61​/61000​/the​-new​-depthiness/
Watt, I.
(2001) The rise of the novel. Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, R.
(2005) The pragmatics of narrative fictionality. In J. Phelan & P. J. Rabinowitz (Eds.), A Companion to Narrative Theory (pp. 150–164). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) The rhetoric of fictionality. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, K.
(1990) Mimesis as make believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Werth, P.
(1999) Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
White, H.
(1978) Tropics of discourse. Essays in cultural criticism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wilderkamp, A., van Montfoort, I. & van Ruiswijk, W.
(1980) Fictionality and convention. Poetics, 9(5–6), 547–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zetterberg Gjerlevsen, S.
(2016a) A novel history of fictionality. Narrative, 24(2), 174–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016b) Fictionality. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology, Hamburg: Hamburg University. Retrieved from http://​www​.lhn​.uni​-hamburg​.de​/article​/fictionality
(2017) How to do things with fictionality: Approaching fictionality through speech act theory. In S. S. Grumsen, P. K. Hansen, R. A. Kraglund, & H. S. Nielsen (Eds.), Expectations: Reader assumptions and author intentions in narrative discourse (pp. 73–96). Odense: Medusa.Google Scholar
(2018) The threshold of fiction. Poetics Today, 39(1), 93–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zipfel, F.
(2014) Fiction across media: Toward a transmedial concept of fictionality. In M.-L. Ryan & J.-N. Thon (Eds.), Storyworlds across Media: Towards a Media-Conscious Narratology (pp. 103–125). Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Biar, Liana de Andrade, Naomi Orton & Liliana Cabral Bastos
2021. Tales from the South. Narrative Inquiry 31:1  pp. 126 ff. Crossref logo
Gibbons, Alison
2021.  In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36],  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
Macgilchrist, Felicitas
2021. When discourse analysts tell stories: what do we ‘do’ when we use narrative as a resource to critically analyse discourse?. Critical Discourse Studies 18:3  pp. 387 ff. Crossref logo
Statham, Simon
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4  pp. 454 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.