Cover not available
Article published In:
Real Fictions: Fictionality, factuality and narrative strategies in contemporary storytelling
Edited by Sam Browse, Alison Gibbons and Mari Hatavara
[Narrative Inquiry 29:2] 2019
► pp. 245–267

Real fictions

Fictionality, factuality and narrative strategies in contemporary storytelling

| Sheffield Hallam University
| Sheffield Hallam University
| Tampere University
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • A contemporary culture of post-truth
  • A Brief history of fictionality from within narrative studies: From 1970s–2000
  • Fictionality studies in the twenty-first century
  • The Fact-Fiction distinction and beyond: Factuality, non-fictionality, and fictionalizing strategies
  • Overview of volume
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 16 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19025.bro
References (129)
References
Andersson, G. (2016). The charge against classical and post-classical narratologies’ “Epistemic” approach to literary fiction. In M. Hatavara, M. Hyvärinen, M. Mäkelä, & F. Mäyrä (Eds.), Narrative theory, literature, and new media. Narrative minds and virtual worlds (pp. 50–66). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Andersson, G. & Sandberg, T. (2018). Sameness versus difference in narratology: Two approaches to narrative fiction. Narrative, 26(3), 241–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrews, M. (2014). Narrating moments of political change. In P. Nesbitt-Larking, C. Kinnvall, & T. Capelos (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global political psychology (pp. 353–368). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ball, J. (2017). Post-truth: How bullshit conquered the world. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
Banfield, A. (1982). Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Abingdon/New York: Routledge & Kenan Paul.Google Scholar
Bareis, J. A. & Nordrum, L. (2015). How to make believe: The fictional truth of representational arts. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bareis, J. A. (2008). The role of fictionality in narrative theory. In L-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp. 155–175). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (2019). ‘Digital fictionality: Possible worlds theory, ontology, and hyperlinks’. In A. Bell & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Possible worlds theory and contemporary narratology (pp. 249–271). Lincoln/Nebraska: Nebraska University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booth, W. C. (1983). The rhetoric of fiction (2nd ed.). London: Penguin Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Browse, S. (2017). Between truth, sincerity and satire. In R. van den Akker, A. Gibbons, & T. Vermeulen (Eds.), Metamodernism: Historicity, affect and depth after postmodernism (pp. 167–182). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
(in press). Straight talking honest politics: rhetorical style and ethos in the mediated politics of metamodernity. In H. Ringrow & S. Pihlaja (Eds.), Contemporary media stylistics. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logo
Bruss, E. (1976). Autobiographical acts: The changing situation of a literary genre. Baltimore, MA/London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, D. (1978). Transparent minds. Narrative modes for presenting consciousness in fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990). Signposts of fictionality: A narratological perspective. Poetics Today, 11(4), 775–804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). The distinction of fiction. Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Colbert, S. (2006, April 28). Stephen Colbert roasts Bush at Whitehouse correspondent’s dinner. [Video file.] Retrieved from [URL]
Currie, G. (1990). The nature of fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Narrative and narrators: A philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Paul. (2015). Ten thesis against fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 74–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Ancona, M. (2017). Post-truth: The new war on truth and how to fight back. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Davis, E. (2017). Post-truth: Peak bullshit – and what we can do about it. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Doležel, L. (1976). Narrative semantics. PTL, 11, 129–151.Google Scholar
(1980). Truth and authenticity in narrative. Poetics Today, 1(3), 7–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988). Mimesis and possible worlds. Poetics Today, 9(3), 475–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). Possible worlds of fiction and history. New Literary History, 29(4), 785–809. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). Heterocosmica: Fiction and possible worlds. Baltimore, MA: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2000). New labour, new language? London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Federman, R. (1981 [1975]). Surfiction – Four propositions in form of an introduction. In R. Federman (Ed.) Surfiction: Fiction now and tomorrow (2nd ed.). Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Felski, R. (2008). Uses of literature. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetterley, J. (1978). The Resisting reader. A feminist approach to American fiction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, W. (2016). “‘Post-truth’ politics and illusory democracy”. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 14(3), 211–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flaxman, S., Sharad, G. & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, M. (1993). The fictions of language and the languages of fiction. The linguistic representation of speech and consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1996). Towards a “natural” narratology. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Genres, text types, or discourse modes? Narrative modalities and generic categorization. Style, 34(2), 274–292.Google Scholar
(2001). Fiction vs. non-fiction: Narratological differentiations. In J. Helbig (Ed.), Erzählen und Erzähltheorie im 20. Jahrhundert. Festschrift für Wilhelm Füger (pp. 85–103). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
(2018). The fiction of the rise of fictionality. Poetics Today, 39(1), 67–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, M. & Nielsen, H. S. (in press). Fictionality Studies from Europe: An Introduction. Arcadia.
Foucault, M. (1984). Truth and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 51–75). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Frus, P. (1994). The politics and poetics of journalistic narrative. The timely and the timeless. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, C. (2006). The rise of fictionality. In F. Moretti (Ed.), The Novel, Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture (pp. 336–363). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2011). What would Napolean do? Historical, fictional, and counterfactual characters. New Literary History, 42(2), 315–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J. (2007). Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. (1990). Fictional narrative, factual narrative. Poetics Today, 2(4), 755–774. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993). Fiction & diction, (C. Porter, trans.). Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbons, A. (2014). Fictionality and ontology. In P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of stylistics (pp. 408–423). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Autonarration, I, and odd address in Ben Lerner’s autofictional novel 10:04 . In A. Gibbons & A. Macrae (Eds.), Pronouns in literature: Positions and perspectives in language (pp. 75–96). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorman, D. (2005). Fiction, theories of. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 163–167). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grishakova, M. (2008). Literariness, fictionality, and the theory of possible worlds. In L.-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp. 57–76). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.Google Scholar
Hamburger, K. (1973). The logic of literature. Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hannan, J. (2018). Trolling ourselves to death? Social media and post-truth politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 214–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, P. K. (2005). When fact becomes fiction. On extra-textual unreliable narration. In L.-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Fact and fiction in narrative. An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 283–307). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 4, Örebro University.Google Scholar
Harshaw (Hrushovski), B. (1984). Fictionality and frames of reference: Remarks on a theoretical framework. Poetics Today, 5(2), 227–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harsin, J. (2015). ‘Regimes of posttruth, post politics and attention economics’. Communication, Culture and Critique, 81, 327–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Post-truth populism: The French anti-gender theory movement and cross-cultural similarities. Communication, culture and Critique, 111, 35–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatavara, M. & Mildorf, J. (2017a). Hybrid fictionality and vicarious narrative experience. Narrative, 25(1), 65–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b). Fictionality, narrative modes, and vicarious storytelling. Style, 51(3), 392–408.Google Scholar
Herman, D. (2002). Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
(2011). Introduction. In D. Herman (Ed.), The Emergence of mind. Representations of consciousness in narrative discourse in English (pp. 1–42). Lincoln/London: The University of Nebraska Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyvönen, A-E. (2018). Careless speech: Conceptualizing post-truth politics. New Perspectives, 26(3), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iser, W. (1993). The fictive and the imaginary: Charting literary anthropology. Baltimore, MA/ London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ishiguro, K. (2015). The Buried Giant. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Iversen, S. & Nielsen, H. S. (2016). The politics of fictionality in documentary form: The act of killing and The ambassador . European Journal of English Studies, 20(3), 249–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly Garrett, R. (2009). Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among internet users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keyes, R. (2004). The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. New York: St Martins Press.Google Scholar
Klastrup, L. & Tosca, S. (2004). Transmedial worlds – Rethinking cyberworld design. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Cyberworlds (2004), 409–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klauk, T. & Köppe, T. (2014). Fiktonalität: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, N. (2017). No is not Enough. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Kuhn, M. & Thon, J.-N. (2017). Transmedial narratology: Current approaches. Narrative, 25(3), 253–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kukkonen, K. & Nielsen, H. S. (2018). Fictionality: Cognition and exceptionality. Poetics Today 39(3), 473–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamarque, P. & Olsen, S. H. (1994). Truth, fiction, and literature. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Lejeune, P. (1989). On autobiography, (K. Leary, trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 61, 353–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1983). Truth in fiction. Philosophy Papers, Volume 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Löschnigg, M. (1999). Narratological categories and the (non-)distinction between factual and fictional narratives. In J. Pier (Ed.), Recent trends in narratological research (pp. 31–48), Tours: Presses Universitaires François-Rabelais. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logo
Lubbock, P. (1921). The craft of fiction. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Mair, J. (2017). Post-truth anthropology. Anthropology Today, 33(3), 3–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McHale, B. (1978). Free indirect discourse: A survey of recent accounts. Poetics and Theory of Literature, 31, 249–287.Google Scholar
(2016). Afterword: A new normal? In M. Hatavara, M. Hyvärinen, M. Mäkelä, & F. Mäyrä (Eds.), Narrative Theory, Literature, and New Media. Narrative Minds and Virtual Worlds (pp. 295–304). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munoz, J. (2017). Somatic markers, rhetoric and post-truth. Frontiers in psychology. 81, article 1273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, H. S. (2010). Natural authors, unnatural narration. In J. Alber & M. Fludernik (Eds.), Postclassical narratology: Approaches and analyses. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
(2011). Unnatural Narratology, Impersonal Voices, Real Authors, and Non-Communicative Narration. In J. Alber and R. Heinze (Eds.), Unnatural Narratives, Unnatural Narratology (pp. 71–88). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, H. S., Phelan, J., & Walsh, R. (2015). Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 61–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011). Filter bubbles: What the internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pavel, T. (1975). ‘Possible worlds in literary semantics’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 34(2), 165–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986). Fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, M. (2001). “Getting behind the image”: personality politics in a Labour Party election broadcast. Language and Literature, 10(3), 211–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phelan, J. (2005). Living to tell about it: A rhetoric and ethics of character narration. Ithaca/ London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(2016). Local fictionality within global non-fiction: Roz Chast’s Why can’t we talk about something more pleasant? . Enthymema, 161, 19–31.Google Scholar
(2017). Fictionality. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 32(2), 235–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Fictionality, audiences, and character: A rhetorical alternative to Catherine Gallagher’s “Rise of fictionality”. Poetics Today, 39(1), 113–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phelan, J. & Nielsen, H. S. (2017). Why There Are No One-to-One Correspondences among Fictionality, Narrative, and Techniques: A Response to Mari Hatavara and Jarmila Mildorf. Narrative, 25(1), 83–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polletta, F., & Lee, J. (2006). Is telling stories good for democracy? Rhetoric in public deliberation after 9/11. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 699–723. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, G. (1991). Narratology, narrative, and meaning. (A. Noble, trans.). Poetics Today, 12(3), 543–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarisation. Annual Review of Political Science, 161, 101–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Punday, D. (2010). Five Strands of Fictionality: The Institutional Construction of Contemporary American Fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Ronen, R. (1994). Possible worlds in literary theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, J. & Hight, C. (2001). Faking it: Mock-documentary and the subversion of factuality. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, M.-L. (1980). Fiction, non-factuals, and the principle of minimal departure. Poetics, 9(4), 403–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1985). The modal structure of narrative universes. Poetics, 6(4), 717–755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington/ Indiapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Avatars of story. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(2008). Transfictionality across media. In J. Pier & J. Á. García Landa (Eds.), Theorizing Narrativity (pp. 387–417). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, J.-M. (2010). Why fiction? (D. Cohn, trans.). Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
(2012). Fictional vs. factual narration. In P. Hühn, J. C. Meister, J. Pier, & W. Schmid (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. Retrieved from [URL]
Searle, J. R. (1975). The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6(2), 319–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P. (2003). On the discourse of satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humour. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skalin, L-Å. (2008). “Telling a story”. Reflections on fictional and non-fictional narratives. In L.-Å. Skalin (Ed.), Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction (pp. 201–260). Örebro Studies in Literary History and Criticism 7, Örebro University.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance, communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spolsky, E. (2015). The contracts of fiction: Cognition, culture, community. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tallis, B. (2016). Living in post-truth: Power/knowledge/responsibility. New Perspectives, 24(1), 7–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, J. P. (1980). (Ed.) Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism. Baltimore, MA/London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
van den Akker, R., Gibbons, A., & Vermeulen, T. (2017). (Eds.), Metamodernism: Historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, T. (2015). The New “Depthiness”. E.Flux 611. Retrieved from [URL]
Watt, I. (2001). The rise of the novel. Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, R. (2005). The pragmatics of narrative fictionality. In J. Phelan & P. J. Rabinowitz (Eds.), A Companion to Narrative Theory (pp. 150–164). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). The rhetoric of fictionality. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as make believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Werth, P. (1999). Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
White, H. (1978). Tropics of discourse. Essays in cultural criticism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wilderkamp, A., van Montfoort, I. & van Ruiswijk, W. (1980). Fictionality and convention. Poetics, 9(5–6), 547–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zetterberg Gjerlevsen, S. (2016a). A novel history of fictionality. Narrative, 24(2), 174–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b). Fictionality. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology, Hamburg: Hamburg University. Retrieved from [URL]
(2017). How to do things with fictionality: Approaching fictionality through speech act theory. In S. S. Grumsen, P. K. Hansen, R. A. Kraglund, & H. S. Nielsen (Eds.), Expectations: Reader assumptions and author intentions in narrative discourse (pp. 73–96). Odense: Medusa.Google Scholar
(2018). The threshold of fiction. Poetics Today, 39(1), 93–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipfel, F. (2014). Fiction across media: Toward a transmedial concept of fictionality. In M.-L. Ryan & J.-N. Thon (Eds.), Storyworlds across Media: Towards a Media-Conscious Narratology (pp. 103–125). Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Can, Ali Selcuk, Yuksel Ekinci & Setenay Dilek-Fidler
2025. Fantasy or reality? Unveiling the power of realistic narratives in tourism social media advertising. Tourism Management 106 ► pp. 104998 ff. DOI logo
Girão, Mel, Hélio Arthur Reis Irigaray & Fabricio Stocker
2023. Fake news and storytelling: two sides of the same coin or two equal coins?. Cadernos EBAPE.BR 21:1 DOI logo
Girão, Mel, Hélio Arthur Reis Irigaray & Fabricio Stocker
2023. Fake news e storytelling: dois lados da mesma moeda ou duas moedas com lados iguais?. Cadernos EBAPE.BR 21:1 DOI logo
Scherr, Alexander
2023. Laissez-Faire Storytelling: Fictionality, Post-Factuality, and the Filmic Voice in Joshua Oppenheimer’s Documentary The Act of Killing (2012). Style 57:3 ► pp. 296 ff. DOI logo
Scherr, Alexander
2023. The ‘Struggle for the Narrative’: Cooperation and Conflict in Tiger King’s Intermedial Universe. Discourses on Culture 19:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Hatavara, Mari, Jussi Kurunmäki & Mykola Andrushchenko
2022. Telling and retelling a historical event: the collapse of the Soviet Union in Finnish parliamentary talk. Scandinavian Journal of History 47:1 ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Shang, Biwu
2022. Narrative theory across borders. Neohelicon 49:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Yili
2022. The rhetoric of factuality and fictionality in Julian Barnes’s the noise of Time and the Man in the Red Coat. Neohelicon 49:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Biar, Liana de Andrade, Naomi Orton & Liliana Cabral Bastos
2021. Tales from the South. Narrative Inquiry 31:1 ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Gibbons, Alison
2021. Chapter 6. “Why do you insist that Alana is not real?”. In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36], ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Macgilchrist, Felicitas
2021. When discourse analysts tell stories: what do we ‘do’ when we use narrative as a resource to critically analyse discourse?. Critical Discourse Studies 18:3 ► pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
Statham, Simon
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4 ► pp. 454 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.