Cover not available
Article published In:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 32:2 (2022) ► pp.309–342

Presenting self and aligning as a team through narratives of victimhood among Kazakh-speaking village neighbors

ORCID logo | Rice University
This study illustrates how personal narratives of victimized self serve two Kazakh-speaking village neighbors to accomplish self-presentation during a mealtime interaction. Integrating Goffman’s (1959) theorization of self-presentation with narrative positioning (Bamberg, 1997; Schiffrin, 1996) and Muslim cultural practices (e.g., Al Zidjaly, 2006), this study conceptualizes mealtime conversations as frontstage and examines two victimhood narratives after providing the sequential overview of the twelve narratives occurred in the interaction. The analysis illustrates how linguistic construction of agentive and epistemic selves of the narrators position them as victims (whose personal items are stolen) in relation to other neighbors (who do the act of stealing) in the story world. This juxtaposition of “I” vs. “Others” in the story world allows the neighbor-tellers to present an idealized self (morally superior neighbors) and function as a team by getting lower hand and aligning with one another against a third party (morally wrong neighbors) in the interaction.
Keywords: self-presentation, teams, idealized self, alignment, narrative positioning, victimhood, Kazakh, neighbors, mealtime conversation, rural community
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Self-presentation and narrative discourse
  • Narratives and interactional teams
  • Victimhood, self-presentation, and getting the lower hand
  • Study method
    • Participants and data
    • Data analysis procedure
  • Analysis
    • Summary and sequence of the victimhood narratives
    • Narrative positioning and self-presentation
      • Narrative one “The lost knife”
      • Narrative two “The shared meat”
    • Narratives and functioning as a team
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 22 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19112.kul
References (60)
References
Al Zidjaly, N. (2006). Disability and anticipatory discourse: The interconnectedness of local and global aspects of talk. Communication & Medicine, 3(2), 101–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). What has happened to Arabs? Identity and face management online. Multilingua, 31(4), 413–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Memes as reasonably hostile laments: A discourse analysis of political dissent in Oman. Discourse & Society, 28(6), 573–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1), 335–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeman, W. (1986). Language, status, and power in Iran. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Branner, R. (2005). Humorous disaster and success stories among female adolescents in Germany. In U. M. Quasthoff and T. Becker (Eds.) Narrative interaction (pp. 113–48), Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, J. (2001). My mind is with you: story sequences in the talk of male friends. Narrative Inquiry, 11(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A. (2008). Who tells which story and why? Micro and macro contexts in narrative. Text & Talk, 28(3), 421–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing Narratives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deppermann, A. (2007). Using the other for oneself: Conversational practices of representing out-group members among adolescents. In M. Bamberg, A. De Fina, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Selves and Identities in Narrative and Discourse (pp. 273–294). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eder, D. & Enke, J. L. (1991). The structure of gossip: Opportunities and constraints on collective expression among adolescents. American Sociological Review, 56(4), 494–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emler, N. (1994). Gossip, reputation, and social adaptation. In R. Goodman and A. Ben-Ze’ev (Eds.), Good Gossip (pp.117–138). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (1998). Narrative performances: A study of modern Greek storytelling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gluckman, M. (1963). Gossip and scandal. Current Anthropology, 4(3), 307–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). Tactical uses of stories: Participation frameworks within girls’ and boys’ disputes. Discourse Processes, 13(1), 33–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactional construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psanthas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar
(1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 255–246). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. (2003). Aligning as a team: Forms of conjoined participation in (stepfamily) interaction. Research on language and social interaction, 36(4), 395–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.I. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 229–252). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegland, M. E. (1998). Flagellation and fundamentalism: (trans)forming meaning, identity, and gender through Pakistani women’s rituals of mourning. American Ethnologist, 25(2), 240–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2(2) 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller-Cohen, D. & Gordon, C. (2003). “On trial”: Metaphor in telling the life story. Narrative Inquiry, 13(1), 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendall, S. and Tannen, D. (2001). Discourse and Gender. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 548–567). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 171–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/ declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar
(1988). On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. E. (1981). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. Journal of Pragmatics, 5(5), 399–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jägervi, L. (2014). Who wants to be an ideal victim? A narrative analysis of crime victims’ self-presentation. Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention, 15(1), 73–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov (Ed.), Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular (pp. 354–96). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., and Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative Analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle/London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, G.H. (1992). Assisted storytelling: deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology, 15(3), 247–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, G. H. (1993). Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 13(2), 213–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, J. (1987). Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 144–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marais, A. (2015). A narrative analysis of young people’s talk of intimate partner violence. Narrative Inquiry, 25(2), 242–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meanwell, E. (2013). Profaning the past to salvage the present: The symbolically reconstructed pasts of homeless shelter residents. Symbolic Interaction, 36(4), 439–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. (2018). ‘You can’t stand on a corner and talk about it…’: Medicinal cannabis use, impression management and the analytical status of interviews. Methodological Innovations, 11(1), 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulholland, J. (1996). A series of story turns: Intertextuality and collegiality. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 16(4), 535–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. (2000). Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., & L. Capps. (2001). Living Narrative: Creating Life in everyday Storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Omelicheva, M. Y. (2011). Islam in Kazakhstan: a survey of contemporary trends and sources of securitization. Central Asian Survey, 30(2), 243–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, G., & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35(5), 677–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. ([1970] 1992). Second stories; “Mm hm”; story prefaces; “local news”; tellability. In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Harvey Sacks: Lectures on conversation, (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. (1995). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1990). The management of a co-operative self during argument: The role of opinions and stories. In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations (pp. 241–259). Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
(1996). Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic construction of identity. Language in Society, 25(2), 167–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suls, J. M. (1977). Gossip as social comparison. Journal of Communication, 27(1), 164–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swan, D., & Linehan, C. (2000). Positioning as a means of understanding the narrative construction of self: A story of lesbian escorting. Narrative inquiry, 10(2), 403–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
(1994). Gender and Discourse. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1984 [2005]). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1989 [2007]). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tovares, A. (2006). Public media, private talk: Gossip about a TV show as ‘quotidian hermeneutics.’ Text & Talk, 26(4–5), 463–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trinch, S. (2007). The pragmatic use of gender in Latina women’s legal narratives of abuse. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 14(1), 51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilce, J. (2005). Traditional laments and postmodern regrets: The circulation of discourse in metacultural context. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 602–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wortham, S. E. (2000). Interactional positioning and narrative self-construction. Narrative inquiry, 10(1), 157–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yemelianova, G. M. (2014). Islam, national identity and politics in contemporary Kazakhstan. Asian Ethnicity, 15(3), 286–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yerkovich, S. (1977). Gossiping as a way of speaking. Journal of Communication, 1(1), 192–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Capus, Nadja & Melody Bozinova
2023. Impression management in corporate corruption settlements: The storied self of the prosecutorial authority. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 73 ► pp. 100578 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.