Cover not available
Article published In:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 33:1 (2023) ► pp.222–253

When it’s “now or never”

Multimodal practices for managing opportunities to initiate other-repair in collaborative storytelling

ORCID logo | Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Individuals who share knowledge of past events may encounter different practical problems when engaging in the co-telling of those events. Drawing upon conversation analysis, this article investigates how co-tellers manage interpolated opportunities to initiate other-repair in collaborative storytelling. The analysis focuses on the placement of different repair operations on the story-in-progress and shows that co-tellers monitor the progressivity of the storytelling activity to identify proper places to initiate repair. Repairs that are initiated out of place can be oriented to as inappropriate and require more interactional work from participants. When tellers project the continuation of the story beyond a proper place, co-tellers display urgency for halting the story’s current trajectory, which shows their orientation to this moment as a last opportunity to initiate repair. This last possible point to repair the story-in-progress is what I call a “now or never” moment. Data stem from video-recorded collaboratively told stories in Spanish.
Keywords: conversation analysis, collaborative storytelling, other-repair, progressivity, multimodality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.(Collaborative) storytelling in conversation
  • 3.The progressivity of action trajectories and last opportunities to initiate other-repair
  • 4.Data and method
  • 5.Analysis
    • The proper place to initiate other-repair in collaborative storytelling
    • Initiating repair out of place
    • Managing last opportunities to initiate repair
  • 6.Results and Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.21005.sat
References (60)
References
Cantarutti, M. (2020). The Multimodal and Sequential Design of Co-Animation as a Practice for Association in English Interaction. University of York.Google Scholar
Clift, R. (2016). Conversation Analysis (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ono, T. (2007). ‘Incrementing’ in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 17 (4), 513–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2017). A “Big Package”: Storytelling. In Interactional linguistics: Study language in social interaction (p. Online-Chapter D). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Thompson, S. A. (2005). A linguistic practice for retracting overstatements: ‘Concessive repair.’ In A. Hakulinen & M. Selting (Eds.), Studies in Discourse and Grammar (Vol. 171, pp. 257–288). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Stefani, E., & Horlacher, A.-S. (2008). Topical and sequential backlinking in a French radio phone-in program: Turn shapes and sequential placements. Pragmatics, 18 (3), 381–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Mundane talk at work: Multiactivity in interactions between professionals and their clientele. Discourse Studies, 20 (2), 221–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M. (2020). Between Sound and Speech: Liminal Signs in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53 (1), 188–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressel, D. (2020). Multimodal word searches in collaborative storytelling: On the local mobilization and negotiation of coparticipation. Journal of Pragmatics, 170 1, 37–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressel, D., & Satti, I. (2021). Embodied Coparticipation Practices in Collaborative Storytelling. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion (ISSN 1617–1837), 22 1, 54–86.Google Scholar
Ehmer, O., Satti, I., Martínez, A., & Pfänder, S. (2019). Un sistema para transcribir el habla en la interacción: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion (ISSN 1617–1837), 20 1, 64–114.Google Scholar
Fox, B., & Heinemann, T. (2019). Telescoping responses to requests: Unpacking progressivity. Discourse Studies, 21 (1), 38–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J. M. Atkinson (Ed.), Structures of Social Action (1st ed., pp. 225–246). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Günthner, S. (2000). Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der Alltagsinteraktion: Grammatische, prosodische, rhetorisch-stilistische und interaktive Verfahren bei der Konstitution kommunikativer Muster und Gattungen. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M. (Eds.). (2014). Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (2007). Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person Reference in Interaction (pp. 255–280). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294–338). Free Press.Google Scholar
(1978). Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp. 219–248). Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, L. (2012). Compromising progressivity: ‘No’-prefacing in Estonian. Pragmatics, 22 (1), 119–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keisanen, T., Rauniomaa, M., & Haddington, P. (2014). Suspending action. From simultaneous to consecutive ordering of multiple courses of action. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 109–133). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K. H., & Holler, J. (2017). Gaze Direction Signals Response Preference in Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50 (1), 12–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, K., & Oloff, F. (2018). Die Multimodalität alltagspraktischen Erzählens. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 48 (2), 277–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Language in the Inner City. Studies in the Black English Vernacular (pp. 354–396). University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H. (1992). Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology, 15 (3), 247–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993). Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 13 (2), 213–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, J. (1987). Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly, 35 (2), 144–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Storytelling in Conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 492–507). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, H., & Huiskes, M. (2001). Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumption marker. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in Discourse and Grammar (Vol. 101, p. 141). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L. (2020[2001]). Conventions for multimodal transcription. [URL]
(2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9 (2), 194–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). The temporal orders of multiactivity. Operating and demonstrating in the surgical theatre. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 34–75). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Questions on the move: The ecology of question-answer sequences in mobility settings. In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Pragmatics & Beyond New Series (Vol. 2931, pp. 161–202). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (2004). Humor, tellability, and conarration in conversational storytelling. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 24 (1), 79–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., Smith, R., & Taylor, C. (1989). Detective Stories At Dinnertime: Problem-Solving Through Co-Narration. Cultural Dynamics, 2 (2), 238–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, R. (2006). Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics, 38 (10), 1752–1775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 210–228). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quasthoff, U. M. (2001). Erzählen als interaktive Gesprächsstruktur. In K. Brinker, G. Antos, W. Heinemann, & S. F. Sager (Eds.), Text- und Gesprächslinguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung (pp. 1293–1309). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, C. W. (2016). Intersubjectivity, Progressivity, and Accountability: Studies in Turn Design. University of California Los Angeles.Google Scholar
(2018). Bueno-, pues-, and bueno-pues-prefacing in Spanish conversation. In J. Heritage & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Studies in Language and Social Interaction (Vol. 311, pp. 59–96). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Intersubjectivity, Normativity, and Grammar. Social Psychology Quarterly, 82 (2), 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. D. (2013). Overall Structural Organization. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 257–280). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. (1995 [1971]). Lecture 4. Spouse talk. In Lectures on Conversation (Vol. 21, pp. 337–443). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50 (4), 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. (1974). An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking (pp. 337–353). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987). On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation. In J. R. E. L. Graham Button (Ed.), Talk and Social Organisation (pp. 54–69). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1995). Lectures on Conversation. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97 (5), 1295–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). When “others” initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21 (2), 205–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation. Language, 53 (2), 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up Closings. Semiotica, 8 (4), 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., et al. (2009). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion (ISSN 1617–1837), 10 1, 353–402.Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2004). “No no no” and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction. Human Communication Research, 30 (2), 260–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41 (1), 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35 (03), 367–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing Response. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43 (1), 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van De Mieroop, D. (2021). The Narrative Dimensions Model and an exploration of various narrative genres. Narrative Inquiry, 31 (1), 4–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, K. G. (1987). Joint Storytelling: Discourse and Interaction. In K. G. Young, Taleworlds and Storyrealms (Vol. 161, pp. 157–185). Springer Netherlands. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Raoufi, Azar
2024. Topicalizing peers’ language: Situated linguistic identities at workplaces. Journal of Pragmatics 232 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Carranza, Ariel Vázquez
2022. Ritualized disbelief in Mexican Spanish talk-in-interaction. Spanish in Context 19:3 ► pp. 481 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.