The psychophysiology of narrating distressing experiences
We examined patterns of psychophysiological arousal related to remembering and narrating distressing events, as
compared to arousal while engaged in positive and neutral recall tasks. Narrating distressing events entailed increased arousal
relative to remembering those events. Analyses of combined data showed that aggregate arousal during narration was related to
post-narration reports of distress and self-perceptions. These results support conceptions of narration as an effortful form of
regulation, and suggest insights about the process through which narrative construction may promote psychological and
physiological benefits.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Narrating, distress, and physiology
- Does narrating have lasting impact on physiological arousal?
- Does arousal in relation to narration relate to self-reported distress and autobiographical reasoning?
- Introduction to study 1
- Study 1 methods
- Participants & design
- Study 1a
- Study 1b
- Study 1c
- Measures
- ANS arousal
- Data collected but not used in studies 1a–1c
- Procedure
- Emotion elicitation
- Regulation
- Reexposure
- Results study 1
- SCL
- RSA
- Control analyses: Effects of stimulus, stimulus order, and gender
- Discussion study 1
- Introduction to study 2
- Study 2 methods
- Participants
- Measures
- Physiological arousal indicators
- Emotional distress outcomes
- Self-event integration outcomes
- Procedures
- Study 2 results
- Arousal during regulation and emotional distress
- Arousal during regulation and self-stability or self-growth?
- Study 2 discussion
- General discussion
- Note
-
References