The successes and failure of narratology
Twentieth-century study of narrative featured many successes and one grave failure. Narratology taught us the basics of how to study the structure of narrative, but proves to be a dead end in the study of texts. This was clear soon after Gérard Genette’s groundbreaking studies, but later works such as Paul Ricoeur’s fail to get beyond narratology. This paper therefore claims that narrative theory has not changed since its inception several decades ago, even though the need for such a change is broadly supported. Attention has been paid to expanding narrative methods to other fields like medicine and education rather than further developing the theory. I advocate a more serious consideration of contemporary literature to renew narrative theory.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Stock, Richard T.
2015.
Native storytelling and narrative innovation: Louise Erdrich's Love Medicine as fictional ethnography.
Brno Studies in English 41:1
► pp. 175 ff.
Stock, Richard T.
2016.
Surprise Ending: Richard Powers’sThe Echo Maker, Mystery Stories, and Unnatural Narratology.
Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 57:4
► pp. 390 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.