Article published In:
Narrative InquiryVol. 25:1 (2015) ► pp.57–69
Feminist revision of oral history methodology for the study of armed conflicts
The case of ETA women
This article sets out presenting the methodological toolbox created for the study of very specific reality: the gathering of oral information in the study of armed conflicts. Taking as a valid reference the oral history technique, we explored new methodological processes that allowed us to reach the lives and stories of the people interviewed more deeply, with a closer approach to their lives, but at the same time respecting and ensuring maximum access and confidentiality. To do this, the oral history methodology was reviewed with the main contributions of feminist epistemology. Thereby, we created ex profeso new methodological processes adapted to study the role of women as violence perpetrators in armed conflicts. Our proposal expands up to 5 different phases with either technical or emotional functions. The validity of this new methodological toolbox has been tested through an extensive research in the armed conflict of the Basque Country (Spain) performing oral histories to 25 women and 10 men.
Keywords: armed conflicts, feminist methodology, oral history, experiential experts, ETA
References (45)
Afonso, C., & Martin, C. (2013). Memoría para la vida. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.
Alison, M. (2009). Women and political violence: Female combatants in ethno-national conflicts. New York & London: Routledge. 
Andrews, M., Sclater, S.D., Squire, C., & Treacher, A. (Eds.). (2000). Lines of narrative: Psychosocial perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Routledge.
Ashfar, H. (2003). Women and wars: Some trajectories towards a feminist peace. Development in Practice, 131, 178–188.
Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Berger, S., & Patai, D. (1991). Women’s word: The feminist practice of oral history. New York and London: Routledge.
Casanova, I. (2007). ETA 1958-2008: Medio siglo de historia. Tafalla: Txalaparta.
Climo, J.J., & Cattell, M.C. (Eds.). (2002) Social memory and history: Anthropological perspectives. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
Cockburn, C. (2001). The gendered dynamics of armed conflict and political violence. In C. Moser & F.C. Clark (Eds.), Victims, perpetrators or actors? Gender, armed conflict and political violence. London & New York: Zed Books.
Enloe, C. (2000). Bananas, beaches and based: Making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Esteban, M.L. (2004). Antropología encarnada. Antropología desde una misma. Papeles del CEIC, 121.
Farr, V. (2005). La desmilitarización con perspectiva de género como herramientas para la construcción de la paz. Cuadernos INER, 21.
Feinman, I.R. (2000). Citizenship rites: Feminist soldiers and feminist antimilitarists. New York & London: New York University Press.
Fivush, R., & Haden, C.A. (Eds.). (2003). Autobiographical memory and the construction of a narrative self: Developmental and cultural perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Geiger, S. (1990). What’s so feminist about women’s oral history? Journal of Women’s History, 2(1), 169–182.
Guillo, M. (2013). La incorporación de la investigación: políticas de la mestruación y cuerpos (re) productivos. Nómadas, 391, 233–245.
Hasso, F.S. (2005). Discursive and political deployments by/of the 2002 Palestinian women suicide bombers/martyrs. Feminist Review, 811, 23–51.
Hamilton, C. (2000). Remembering the Basque nationalist family: Daughters, fathers and the reproduction of the radical nationalist community. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 1(2), 153–171.
. (2007). The gender politics of political violence: Women armed activist of ETA. Feminist Review, 861, 132–148.
Hughes, C., & Cohen, R.L. (2010). Feminists really do count: The complexity of feminist methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(3), 189–196.
Ibarra, P. (1987). La evolución estratégica de ETA. Donostia: Kriselu.
Josselson, R., & Lieblich, A. (Eds.). (1993). Narrative study of lives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Krylova, A. (2005).
Stalinist identity from the viewpoint of gender: Rearing a generation of professionally violent women-fighters in 1930s Stalinist Russia
. In S. D’Cruze & A. Rao (Eds.), Violence, vulnerability and embodiment. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (Eds.). (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Letamendia, F. (1994). Historia del nacionalismo vasco y de E.T.A. San Sebastián: R&B Ediciones.
Magallón, C. (2006). Mujeres en pie de paz. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Mascia-Less, F. (2011). A companion to the anthropology of the body and embodiment. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mckay, S. (1998). The psychology of societal reconstruction and peace: A gendered perspective. In L.A. Lorentzen & J. Turpin (Eds.), The women and war reader. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Mendia Azkue, I. (2008). Estrategias de organizaciones de mujeres para una paz con justicia de género. Bilbao: Hegoa institutua.
Moser, C., & Clark, F. (Eds.). (2001). Perpetrators or actors? Gender, armed conflict and political violence. London and New York: Zed Books.
Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research. London & Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
O´Keefe, T. (2013). Feminist identity development and activism in revolutionary movements. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Parr, S. (2015). Integrating critical realist and feminist methodologies: Ethical and analytical dilemmas. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(2), 193–207.
Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of life 2: An invitation to critical humanism. London: Sage.
Portelli, A. (1981). The particularities of oral history. History Workshop Journal, 12(1), 96–107.
Reardon, B. (1993). Women and peace. Albany, NY: SUNY.
Romano, M., & Cuenca, M.J. (2013). Discourse markers, structure, and emotionality in oral narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 23(2), 344–370.
Ruddick, S. (1998). Women of peace: A feminist construction. In L. Lorentzen & J. Turpin (Eds.), The women and war reader. New York, NY: New York University.
Schneider, W. (2002). So they understand: Cultural issues in oral history. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Sharrif, F. (2014). Establishing field relations through shared ideology: Insider self-positioning as a precarious/productive foundation in multisited studies. Field Methods, 26(1), 3–20.
Smith, S., & Watson, J. (2001). Reading autobiography: A guide for interpreting life narratives. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Smorty, A. (2011). Autobiographical memory and autobiographical narrative: What is the relationship? Narrative Inquiry, 21(2), 303–310.
Summerfield, P. (2004). Culture and composure: Creating narratives of the gendered self in oral history interviews. Cultural and Social History, 1(1), 65–93.
Thomson, A. (2007). Four paradigm transformations in oral history. Oral History Review, 34(1), 49–70.
Yow, V. (1997). ‘Do I like them too much?’: Effects of the oral history interview on the interviewer and vice-versa. Oral History Review, 24(1), 55–79.