Cover not available
Article published In:
Narrative in ‘societies of intimates’
Edited by Lesley Stirling, Jennifer Green, Tania Strahan and Susan Douglas
[Narrative Inquiry 26:2] 2016
► pp. 257–285

Expression of the interpersonal connection between narrators and characters in Umpila and Kuuku Ya’u storytelling

| Lund University | University of Sydney
This article analyses the selection of person reference expressions in narratives in Umpila/Kuuku Ya’u, a Pama-Nyungan language of Cape York Peninsula (Australia). The analysis takes the principle of topic-fittedness, one of a set of design principles proposed to account for the interactional conditioning of person reference formulation, and applies it to Umpila/Kuuku Ya’u narration. The ensuing anlaysis demonstrates that referring practices are conditioned by, and ultimately work to convey, manifold contextual aspects of the narrative and the speech event it is embedded in. The focus is on the narrator’s use and manipulation of kin-terms to highlight the interpersonal connection between themselves and characters. Kin-term expressions are shown to be fitted to the pragmatic-action being undertaken by the narrator: namely, to signal authority to quote another’s words in represented speech; to bolster authority to speak on a subject matter; and to develop a stance in relation to events being narrated.
Keywords: person reference, kin-terms, narrative, Umpila/Kuuku Ya'u
Published online: 30 March 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.26.2.04hil
References (65)
References
Aikhenvald, A. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J.M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Black, P. (2010). Co-narration of a Koko-Bera story: Giants in Cape York Peninsula. In I. Mushin, B. Baker, R. Gardner, & M. Harvey (Eds.), Indigenous language and social identity: Papers in honour of Michael Walsh (pp. 275–289). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Blythe, J. (2009). Doing referring in Murriny Patha conversation. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Sydney, Sydney.Google Scholar
. (2010). Self-association in Murriny Patha talk-in-interaction. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 30(4), 447–469.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. (2007). Principles of person reference in Tzeltal conversation. In N. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives (pp. 172–202). Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. (1979). The flow of thought and the flow of language. In T. Givón (Ed.), Discourse and syntax (pp. 159–181). New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1980). The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chase, A.K. (1980). Which way now? Tradition, continuity and change in a north Queensland Aboriginal Community. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.    DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, R. (2006). Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(5), 569–595.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N.J. (2006). Social consequences of common ground. In N.J. Enfield & S.C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 399–430). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
. (2013). Reference in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 433–454). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Enfield, N.J., & Stivers, T. (2007). Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, B. (1987). Morphosyntactic markedness and discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 11(1), 359–375.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garde, M. (2003). Social deixis in Bininj Kun-wok conversation. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
. (2008). Person reference, proper names and circumspection in Bininj Kunwok conversation. In I. Mushin & B. Baker (Eds.), Discourse and grammar in Australian languages (pp. 203–232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. (1964). Classification of northern Paman languages, Cape York Peninsula, Australia: A research report. Oceanic Linguistics, 3(1), 248–264.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, C.W.M. (1930). Personal Names among the Tiwi. Oceania, 1(1), 280–290.    DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haviland, J. (1982). Kin and country at Wakooka Outstation: An exercise in rich interpretation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 36(1), 53–70.Google Scholar
. (1996). Projections, transpositions, and relativity. In J.J. Gumperz & S.C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 271–323). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, C. (2011). Collaborative narration and cross-speaker repetition in Umpila and Kuuku Ya’u. In I. Mushin, B. Baker, R. Gardner, & M. Harvey (Eds.), Indigenous language and social identity: Papers in honour of Michael Walsh (pp. 249–273). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
. (Forthcoming). Person reference in Umpila/Kuuku Ya’u narrative. (Unpublished PhD thesis). Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, & University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Himmelmann, N. (1998). Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics, 36(1), 161–195.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinds, J. (1977). Paragraph structure and pronominalization. Papers in Linguistics, 10(1-2), 77–99.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D.N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294–338). New York: MacMillan/The Free Press.Google Scholar
Kim, M., Stirling, L., & Evans, N. (2001). Thematic organization of discourse and referential choices in Australian languages. Discourse and Cognition, 8(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, C. (2013). Repair. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 229–256). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.    DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.C. (2007). Optimizing person reference - perspectives from usage on Rossel Island. In N. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives (pp. 29–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longacre, R. (1979). The paragraph as a grammatical unit. In T. Givón (Ed.), Discourse and syntax (pp. 311–335). New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, W. (1988). Joint construction of narrative in Gooniyandi (La Trobe Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 11). Bundoora, Victoria: La Trobe University.Google Scholar
. (2012). Kin terms and context among the Gooniyandi. Anthropological Linguistics, 54(2), 161–186.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mushin, I. (2000). Evidentiality and deixis in narrative retelling. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(7), 927–957.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative retelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (1997). Narrative authenticity. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1-4), 83–90.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223–255). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Rumsey, A. (1981). Kinship and context among the Ngarinyin. Oceania, 51(3), 181–192.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation, 2 Vols (Fall 1964 - Spring 1972). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A. (1996). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In B.A. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 437–485). Amsterdam: John Benajmins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1997). “Narrative analysis” thirty years later. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1-4), 97–106.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senft, G. (2007). Reference and ‘référence dangereuse’ to persons in Kilivila: An overview and a case study. In N. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives (pp. 309–337). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Stanner, W. (1937). Aboriginal modes of address and reference in the north-west of the Northern Territory. Oceania, VII(3), 300–315.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stirling, L. (2008). “Double reference” in Kala Lagaw Ya narratives. In I. Mushin & B. Baker (Eds.), Discourse and grammar in Australian languages (pp. 167–202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). The treatment of reported speech. In L. de Beuzeville & P. Peters (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2008 Australian Linguistic Society Conference, Sydney, 2-4 July 2008 (pp. 1–19). Sydney: Sydney University.Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2007). Alternative recognitionals in person reference. In N.J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives (pp. 73–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., Enfield, N.J., & Levinson, S.C. (2007). Person reference in interaction. In N. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives (pp. 1–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton, P. (1978). Wik: Aboriginal society, territory and language at Cape Keerweer, Cape York Peninsula. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
. (1982). Personal power, kin classification and speech etiquette in Aboriginal Australia. In J. Heath, F. Merlan, & A. Rumsey (Eds.), Languages of kinship in Aboriginal Australia (Oceania Linguistic Monographs 24) (pp. 182–200). Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Thomson, D.F. (1935). The joking relationship and organized obscenity in North Queensland. American Anthropologist, 37(3), 460–490.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1946). Names and naming in the Wik Monkan tribe. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 76(2), 157–168.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1972). Kinship and behaviour in North Queensland: A preliminary account of kinship and social organization on Cape York Peninsula. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R. (1987). Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, J-C., & De Cock, B. (2008). Construing confrontation: Grammar in the construction of a key historical narrative in Umpithamu. Language in Society, 37(2), 217–240.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubin, H. & Hewitt, L.E. (1995). The deictic center: A theory of deixis in narrative. In J.F. Duchan, G.A. Bruder & L.E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 129–155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Hatoss, Anikó
2024. Denial from the other side: Experiences of racism as narrated by South Sudanese refugees in Australia. Discourse Studies 26:3 ► pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Hill, Clair
2022. Multiparty storytelling in Umpila and Kuuku Ya’u. Australian Journal of Linguistics 42:3-4 ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Carew, Margaret
2016. Represented experience in Gun-nartpa storyworlds. Narrative Inquiry 26:2 ► pp. 286 ff. DOI logo
Green, Jennifer
2016. Multimodal complexity in sand story narratives. Narrative Inquiry 26:2 ► pp. 312 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.