In this paper, we describe a method for performing structural narrative analysis that draws on narratology and literary studies, moving structural narrative analysis from a focus on examining linguistic parts of narratives to understanding thematic structures that make up the whole narrative. We explore the possibility of constructing participant narratives using Campbell’s monomyth as a coding and structuralizing scheme. The method we describe is the response to the question, “How might we find a reliable way to construct ‘smooth’ stories (with attention to the structures of stories) so that we might compare trajectories of student experiences?” To answer this question, we use narrative interviews from a larger study to show how this method can make sense of interviews and construct accessible and useful participant narratives. We close by providing an example narrative constructed using the monomyth coding scheme and discussing benefits and difficulties associated with this method.
Heinen, S. (2009). The role of narratology in narrative research across the disciplines. In S. Heinen & R. Sommer (Eds.), Narratologia: Narratology in the age of cross-disciplinary narrative research (pp. 193–211). Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter.
Herman, D. (2007). Storytelling and the sciences of mind: Cognitive narratology, discursive psychology, and narratives in face-to-face interaction. Narrative, 15(3), 307–325.
Herman, D. (2009). Cognitive Narratology. In P. Hühn, J. Pier, W. Schmid & J. Schönert (Eds.), Handbook of Narratology (pp. 30–43). Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter.
Kellam, N., Gerow, K., & Walther, J. (2015, June). Narrative Analysis in Engineering Education Research: Exploring Ways of Constructing Narratives to have Resonance with the Reader and Critical Research Implications. Paper presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle. .
Kim, J. (2016). Understanding narrative inquiry. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R. & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Leeming, D. A. (2010). Monomyth. In D. A. Leeming, K. Madden, & S. Marlan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of psychology and religion (pp. 578–580). New York, NY: Springer Science.
Mitchell, M. C. & Egudo. M. (2003). A review of narrative methodology. Adelaide: DSTO Systems Sciences Laboratory. Retrieved from [URL]
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5–23.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Sommer, R. (2009). A cross-disciplinary approach to literary storytelling. In S. Heinen & R. Sommer (Eds.), Narratologia: Narratology in the age of cross-disciplinary narrative research (pp. 193–211). New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
Spence, D. P. (1986). Narrative smoothing and clinical wisdom. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 211–232). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Webster, L., & Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. New York, NY: Routledge..
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Cruz, Joshua & Kate T. Anderson
2024. Reconceptualizing online discussion forums as a fabricated focus group: illuminating educators’ language ideologies through asynchronous discussion posts. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 37:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Shanachilubwa, Kanembe, Gabriella Sallai & Catherine G. P. Berdanier
2023. Investigating the tension between persistence and well‐being in engineering doctoral programs. Journal of Engineering Education 112:3 ► pp. 587 ff.
Wang, Lingxuan
2023. APPLIED PHYSICS OF CONDENSED MATTER (APCOM 2022) [APPLIED PHYSICS OF CONDENSED MATTER (APCOM 2022), 2778], ► pp. 040026 ff.
Williams, Bill & Luísa Cagica Carvalho
2022. Trajectory of a fourth-generation female entrepreneur as seen through a monomyth lens – Casa Ermelinda Freitas. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship 34:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Chance, Shannon M., Bill Williams & Ines Direito
2021. 2021 4th International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE), ► pp. 1 ff.
Prokhorov, Artem
2021. The Hero’s Journey and Three Types of Metaphor in Pixar Animation. Metaphor and Symbol 36:4 ► pp. 229 ff.
Nazhandali, Leyla, Desen S. Ozkan, David P. Reeping, Liesl Baum & Lisa D. McNair
2020. 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), ► pp. 1 ff.
Boklage, Audrey, Brooke Coley & Nadia Kellam
2019. Understanding engineering educators’ pedagogical transformations through the Hero’s Journey. European Journal of Engineering Education 44:6 ► pp. 923 ff.
Kellam, Nadia, Audrey Boklage & Brooke Coley
2019. Introduction. In Transformative Teaching [Synthesis Lectures on Engineering, ], ► pp. 1 ff.
Cruz, Joshua & Nadia Kellam
2018. Beginning an Engineer's Journey: A Narrative Examination of How, When, and Why Students Choose the Engineering Major. Journal of Engineering Education 107:4 ► pp. 556 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Transformative Teaching [Synthesis Lectures on Engineering, ],
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.