A computational model of the grammatical aspects of word recognition as supertagging

Cited by nine other publications

Morgan, Adam M. & Victor S. Ferreira

2021. Beyond input: Language learners produce novel relative clause types without exposure.. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 33:5 ► pp. 483 ff.

Hinojosa, J. A., E. M. Moreno & P. Ferré

2020. Affective neurolinguistics: towards a framework for reconciling language and emotion. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:7 ► pp. 813 ff.

Spehar, Brent, Stacey Goebel & Nancy Tye-Murray

2015. Effects of Context Type on Lipreading and Listening Performance and Implications for Sentence Processing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 58:3 ► pp. 1093 ff.

Trueswell, John C. & Lila R. Gleitman

2012. Learning to parse and its implications for language acquisition. In The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ► pp. 635 ff.

Dickey, Michael Walsh & Ann C. Bunger

2011. Comprehension of elided structure: Evidence from sluicing. Language and Cognitive Processes 26:1 ► pp. 63 ff.

McRae, Ken, Mary Hare, Jeffrey L. Elman & Todd Ferretti

2005. A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns. Memory & Cognition 33:7 ► pp. 1174 ff.

Novick, Jared M., John C. Trueswell & Sharon L. Thompson-Schill

2005. Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 5:3 ► pp. 263 ff.

Frank, Robert

2004. Restricting grammatical complexity. Cognitive Science 28:5 ► pp. 669 ff.

Tabor, Whitney & Sean Hutchins

2004. Evidence for Self-Organized Sentence Processing: Digging-In Effects.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30:2 ► pp. 431 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.