Reduced relatives judged hard require constraint-based analyses

Filip, Hana; Tanenhaus, Michael K.; Carlson, Greg N.; Allopenna, Paul D.; Blatt, Joshua

doi:10.1075/nlp.4.14fil

Part of

The Lexical Basis of Sentence Processing: Formal, computational and experimental issues
Edited by Paola Merlo and Suzanne Stevenson
[Natural Language Processing 4] 2002
► pp. 255–279

Reduced relatives judged hard require constraint-based analyses

Hana Filip

Michael K. Tanenhaus

Greg N. Carlson

Paul D. Allopenna

Joshua Blatt

Published online: 11 July 2002

https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.4.14fil

Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Order by:

Duffield, Cecily Jill & Lise Menn

2014. Simplicity and complexity in constructions. The Mental Lexicon 9:2 ► pp. 232 ff.

McRae, Ken, Mary Hare & Michael K. Tanenhaus

2005. Meaning through syntax is insufficient to explain comprehension of sentences with reduced relative clauses: Comment on McKoon and Ratcliff (2003).. Psychological Review 112:4 ► pp. 1022 ff.

Pereplyotchik, David

2017. Computational Models and Psychological Reality. In Psychosyntax [Philosophical Studies Series, 129], ► pp. 181 ff.

Pereplyotchik, David

2017. The Psychological Reality of Syntactic Principles. In Psychosyntax [Philosophical Studies Series, 129], ► pp. 223 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.