Article published in:
Early history of the North Sea Germanic languages
Edited by Stephen Laker and Hans Frede Nielsen †
[NOWELE 74:1] 2021
► pp. 426
References

References

Adamczyk, E.
2018Reshaping of the nominal inflection in Early Northern West Germanic. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019The dynamics of changes in the early English inflection: Evidence from the Old English nominal system. In C. Claridge & B. Bös (eds.), Historical syntax: Papers from the 19th Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL), Duisburg-Essen 22–26 August 2016, 9–33. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Adamczyk, E. & A. Versloot
2019Phonological constraints on morphology: Evidence from Old English nominal inflection. Folia Linguistica 40(1). 153–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. L.
1995Case marking and reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Blevins, J. P.
2004Inflection classes and economy. In G. Müller, L. Gunkel & G. Zifonun (eds.), Explorations in nominal inflection, 41–85. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, A.
2012Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, G.
1996Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 1–16. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boutkan, D.
1995The Germanic ‘Auslautgesetze’. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
1995Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5). 425–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Frequency of use and the organisation of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A.
1977Old English grammar (reprint of the first edition 1959). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Corbett, G., A. Hippisley, D. Brown & P. Marriott
2001Frequency, regularity and the paradigm: A perspective from Russian on a complex relation. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 201–226. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dammel, A. & S. Kürschner
2008Complexity in nominal plural allomorphy: A contrastive survey of ten Germanic languages. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 243–262. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dammel, A., S. Kürschner & D. Nübling
2010Pluralallomorphie in zehn germanischen Sprachen. Konvergenzen und Divergenzen in Ausdrucksverfahren und Konditionierung. In A. Dammel, S. Kürschner & D. Nübling (eds.), Kontrastive germanistische Linguistik, 587–642. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S.
2003The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner Law: A logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(4). 145–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H.
2004The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology 25 (2). 104–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
2002Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24. 297–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. & L. Collins
2009Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function. Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal 93. 329–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardani, F.
2013Dynamics of morphological productivity. The evolution of noun classes from Latin to Italian. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldschneider, J. & R. DeKeyser
2001Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 51. 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, J. A.
1990Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J.
1966Language universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
2006Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(1). 25–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics. 19(1). 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
2004Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Healey, A., J. Holland, D. McDougall & I. McDougall
(eds.) 2009The Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, E. & A. P. Versloot
2019Factors promoting the retention of irregularity: On the interplay of salience, absolute frequency and proportional frequency in West Frisian plural morphology. Morphology 29. 31–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, R. M.
1992A grammar of Old English. Volume I: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. & R. D. Fulk
2011A grammar of Old English. Volume II: Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hosmer, D. W. & S. Lemeshow
1989Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M.
1993Schemata bei der Pluralbildung im Deutschen: Versuch einer kognitiven Morphologie. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Kürschner, S.
2008Deklinationsklassen-Wandel eine diachron-kontrastive Studie zur Entwicklung der Pluralallomorphie im Deutschen, Niederländischen, Schwedischen und Dänischen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S. G. & A. Cohen
1995Spreken en verstaan. Een nieuwe inleiding tot de experimentele fonetiek. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Versloot, A. P. & E. Adamczyk
2018Plural inflection in North Sea Germanic languages: A multivariate analysis of morphological variation. In A. Dammel, M. Eitelmann & M. Schmuck (eds.), Reorganising grammatical variation. Diachronic studies in the retention, redistribution and refunctionalisation of linguistic variants, 17–55. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, W. U.
1989Inflectional morphology and naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K.
1936The psychobiology of language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar