Article published in:
Early history of the North Sea Germanic languages
Edited by Stephen Laker and Hans Frede Nielsen †
[NOWELE 74:1] 2021
► pp. 6679
References

References

Bammesberger, A.
1991Ingvaeonic sound changes and the Anglo-Frisian runes. In A. Bammesberger (ed.), Old English runes and their Continental background, 389–408. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
1994The development of the runic script and its relationship to Germanic phonological history. In T. Swan, E. Mørck & O. Jansen Westvik (eds.), Language change and language structure: Older Germanic languages in a comparative perspective, 1–25. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Das futhark und seine Weiterentwicklung in der anglo-friesischen Überlieferung. In A. Bammesberger & G. Waxenberger (eds.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen, 171–187. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boutkan, D.
1996A concise grammar of the Old Frisian dialect of the First Riustring Manuscript. Odense: Odense University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braune, W.
2004Althochdeutsche Grammatik I: Laut- und Formenlehre. 15. Auflage bearbeitet von I. Reiffenstein. Tübingen: Niemeyer. [Cited in the text as Braune/Reiffenstein] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A.
1959Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Derolez, R.
1990Runic literacy among the Anglo-Saxons. In A. Bammesberger & A. Wollmann (eds.), Britain 400–600: Language and history, 397–436. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Düwel, K. & S. Nowak
2011Die semantisch lesbaren Inschriften auf Goldbrakteaten. In W. Heizmann & M. Axboe (eds.), Die Goldbrakteaten der Völkerwanderungszeit – Auswertung und Neufunde, 375–473. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eichner, H.
1990Die Ausprägung der linguistischen Physiognomie des Englischen anno 400 bis 600 n. Chr. In A. Bammesberger & A. Wollmann (eds.), Britain 400–600: Language and history, 307–333. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Grønvik, O.
1996Fra Vimose til Ødemotland. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Hills, C.
1991aThe archaeological context of runic finds. In A. Bammesberger (ed.), Old English runes and their continental background, 41–59. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
1991bThe gold bracteate from Undley, Suffolk: Some further thoughts. Studien zur Sachsenforschung 7. 145–151.Google Scholar
Hines, J.
1984The Scandinavian character of Anglian England in the pre-Viking period (= British Archaeological Reports. British Series 124). Oxford: B.A.R.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990aPhilology, archaeology and the adventus Saxonum vel Anglorum . In A. Bammesberger & A. Wollmann (eds.), Britain 400–600: Language and history, 17–36. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
1990bThe runic inscriptions of early Anglo-Saxon England. In A. Bammesberger & A. Wollmann (eds.), Britain 400–600: Language and history, 437–455. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Hines, J. & B. Odenstedt
1987The Undley bracteate and its runic inscription. Studien zur Sachsenforschung 6. 73–94.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M.
1992Phonology and morphology. In R. M. Hogg (ed.). The Cambridge history of the English language, volume I: The beginnings to 1066, 67–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holthausen, F.
1921Altsächsisches Elementarbuch. 2. Auflage. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Klein, T.
1977Studien zur Wechselbeziehung zwischen altsächsischem und althochdeutschem Schreibwesen und ihrer sprach- und kulturgeschichtlichen Bedeutung. Göppingen: Kümmerle.Google Scholar
Lass, R.
1994Old English: A historical linguistic companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Looijenga, T.
1996On the origin of the Anglo-Frisian runic innovations. In T. Looijenga & A. Quak (eds.), Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 45), 109–122. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1997Runes around the North Sea and on the continent AD 150–700: Texts and contexts. Proefschrift (Ph.D. dissertation). Rijksuniversiteit van Groningen.Google Scholar
2003Texts and contexts of the oldest runic inscriptions (= The Northern World 4). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
MacLeod, M. & B. Mees
2001The triple binds of Kragehul and Undley. NOWELE 38. 17–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Runic amulets and magic objects. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
McKinnell, J. & R. Simek (with K. Düwel
) 2004Runes, magic and religion: A sourcebook (= Studia Medievalia Septentrionalia 10). Wien: Fassbaender.Google Scholar
Moltke, E.
1985Runes and their origin, Denmark and elsewhere (transl. by P. G. Foote). Copenhagen: The National Museum of Denmark.Google Scholar
Nedoma, R.
2006Schrift und Sprache in den südgermanischen Runeninschriften. In A. Bammesberger & G. Waxenberger (eds.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen, 109–156. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, H. F.
1991aThe Undley Bracteate, “Continental Anglian” and the early Germanic of Schleswig-Holstein. In J. O. Askedal, H. Bjorvand & E. F. Halvorsen (eds.), Festskrift til Ottar Grønvik på 75-årsdagen den 21. oktober 1991, 32–52. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
1991bThe Straubing Heliand-Fragment and the Old English dialects. In P. Sture Ureland & G. Broderick (eds.), Language contact in the British Isles, 243–273. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995The emergence of the os and ac runes in the runic inscriptions of England and Frisia: A linguistic assessment. In V. F. Faltings, A. G. H. Walker & O. Wilts (eds.), Friesische Studien II, 19–34. Odense: Odense University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998The continental backgrounds of English and its insular development until 1154 (= A Journey through the History of the English Language in England and America I). Odense: Odense University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000The early runic language of Scandinavia: Studies in Germanic dialect geography. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
2006The vocalism of the Undley runes viewed from a North-Sea Germanic perspective. In A. Bammesberger & G. Waxenberger (eds.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen, 209–216. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Gothic and early runic: Two sound systems compared. NOWELE 58/59. 427–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014New methods in early Germanic language research with special reference to comparative vowel typology. In H. Reichert & C. Scheungraber (eds.), Germanische Altertumskunde: Quellen, Methoden, Ergebnisse. Akten des Symposiums anlässlich des 150. Geburtstags von Rudolf Much, Wien, 28.-30. September 2012 (= Philologica Germanica, Bd. 35), 159–170. Wien: Fassbaender.Google Scholar
2015The vowel systems of Old English, Old Norse and Old High German compared. In J. O. Askedal & H. F. Nielsen (eds.), Early Germanic languages in contact, 261–276. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Odenstedt, B.
1983The inscription on the Undley bracteate and the beginnings of English runic writing (= Umeå Papers in English 5). Umeå: Department of English, Umeå University.Google Scholar
1990On the origin and early history of the runic script (= Acta Academiae Regiae Gustavi Adolph 59). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Page, R. I.
1985Runic links across the North Sea in the pre-Viking-Age. In H. Bekker-Nielsen & H. F. Nielsen (eds.), Fjerde tværfaglige vikingesymposium, 31–49. Moesgård: Forlaget hikuin.Google Scholar
1991Anglo-Saxon runic studies: The way ahead? In A. Bammesberger (ed.), Old English runes and their continental background, 15–39. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
1996On the baffling nature of Frisian runes. In T. Looijenga & A. Quak (eds.), Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 45), 131–150. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1999An introduction to English runes. 2nd edn. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
2010The position of Old English runes in the runic tradition. In J. O. Askedal, H. Bjorvand et al. (eds.), Zentrale Probleme bei der Erforschung der älteren Runen (= Osloer Beiträge zur Germanistik 41), 137–150. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Parsons, D.
1994The language of the Anglo-Saxon settlers. In H. F. Nielsen & L. Schøsler (eds.), The origins and development of emigrant languages, 141–156. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
1996The origins and chronology of the “Anglo-Frisian” additional runes. In T. Looijenga & A. Quak (eds.), Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 45), 151–170. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1999Recasting the runes: The reform of the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc (= Runrön 14). Uppsala: Institutionen för nordiska språk, Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S.
2005The Undley bracteate reconsidered: Archaeological, linguistic and runological perspectives. Anglo-Saxon Studies in Archaeology and History 13. 31–49.Google Scholar
Valentin, P.
1969Phonologie de l’allemand ancient: Les systèmes vocaliques. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1978The simplification of the unstressed vowel systems in Old High German. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Recent developments in historical phonology, 374–389. The Hague: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waxenberger, G.
2006The representation of vowels in unstressed syllables in the Old English runic corpus. In A. Bammesberger & G. Waxenberger (eds.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen, 272–314. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar