Cover not available
Article published In:
Historical Germanic morphosyntax
Edited by Stephen Laker and John Ole Askedal
[NOWELE 74:2] 2021
► pp. 278–307

From case to topology

Changes in the Late Middle Danish case system and the reasons for them

| University of Copenhagen
The Scanian dialect of Middle Danish underwent a range of changes and reductions in its case system. I argue that these changes were caused neither by phonological developments nor by language contact as often assumed, but by multiple processes of grammaticalisation. The present paper focuses on one of these factors: that the relatively predictable constituent order within the Middle Danish noun phrase made case marking redundant in its function of marking noun-phrase internal agreement between head and modifier(s). This redundancy caused the case system to undergo a regrammation where the indexical sign relations changed so that the expression of morphological case no longer indicated this noun-phrase-internal agreement, leaving only topology (as well as morphologically marked number and gender agreement) as markers of this type of agreement. This factor contributed to the subsequent degrammation of the entire case system.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The case system of Middle Danish (Scanian)
    • 2.1Skånske Lov ‘Scanian Law’
    • 2.2Sjælens Trøst
      • 2.2.1The traditional system
      • 2.2.2Case marking on adjectives and determiners only
      • 2.2.3No case marking in nominal phrases
      • 2.2.4Mixed systems
    • 2.3Søndagsevangelier
    • 2.4Summary of the systems
  • 3.Reasons for the systemic changes
    • 3.1Traditional explanations
      • 3.1.1Reductive phonological changes
      • 3.1.2Influence from Low German
    • 3.2Grammaticalisation
    • 3.3Redundancy in noun-phrase-internal agreement
      • 3.3.1Noun-phrase-internal agreement
      • 3.3.2Noun-phrase internal topology
      • 3.3.3Grammatical sign relations and redundancy
    • 3.4Principle of markedness agreement
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00059.han
References (56)
References
Åkerberg, B. 2012. Älvdalsk grammatik. Ulum Dalska.Google Scholar
Allen, C. L. 2006. Ch. 9. Case syncretism and word order change. In A. van Kemenade & B. Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 209–223. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, H. 1962. Oldnordisk grammatik. 3rd rev. edn. Copenhagen: Schultz.Google Scholar
1980. Morphological change: towards a typology. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, 1–50. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Markedness and the theory of linguistic change. In: H. Andersen (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic change in progress. Papers from a workshop held at the 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver, B.C., 14 August 1999, 21–57. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Grammation, regrammation, and degrammation: Tense loss in Russian. Diachronica 23(2). 231–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010a. Nogle bemærkninger om sproglige indekser. Handout of presentation held at the Meeting of the Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen, 12 January 2010.
2010b. Chapter 8: From morphologization to demorphologization. In S. Luraghi & V. Bubenik (eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to historical linguistics (Bloomsbury Companions), 117–146. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Askedal, J. O. 2005. Typological reflections on loss of morphological case in Middle Low German and in the mainland Scandinavian languages. In M. Fortescue et al. (eds.), Historical linguistics 2003, 1–20. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baechler, R. & S. Pröll. 2018. Loss and preservation of case in Germanic non-standard varieties. Glossa 3(1). 1131. 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barber, C., J. C. Beal & P. A. Shaw. 2009. The English language. A historical introduction. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bjerrum, A. 1966. Grammatik over Skånske Lov efter B 74. København: Københavns Universitets Fond til Tilvejebringelse af Læremidler.Google Scholar
Blake, B. 2004. Ch. 102. Case. In G. Booij & al. (eds.), Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung 2 – Morphology. An international handbook on inflection and word-formation 21 (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 17(2)), 1073–1090. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boutkan, D. 1995. The Germanic ‘Auslautgesetze’. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Braune, W. 1886. Althochdeutsche Grammatik. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Diderichsen, P. 1941. Sætningsbygningen i Skaanske Lov fremstillet som Grundlag for en rationel dansk Syntaks. København: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Enger, H.-O. 2013. Inflectional change, ‘sound laws’, and the autonomy of morphology. Diachronica 301. 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falk, H. & A. Torp. 1900. Dansk-norskens syntax i historisk fremstilling. Kristiania: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. 2010. Word-order change as a source of grammaticalisation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortson, B. W., IV. 2010. Indo-European language and culture. An introduction. 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hansen, B. S. S. 2016. Lamo talgida or talgida lamo. An indication of a paradigmatic ablative in Proto-Norse? Arkiv för nordisk filologi 1311. 5–20.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1996. Word-class-changing inflection and morphological theory. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 43–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. 1976. The Scandinavian languages. An introduction to their history. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Heltoft, L. 1996. Paradigmatic structure, word order and grammaticalisation. In E. Engberg-Pedersen et al. (eds.), Content, expression and structure. Studies in Danish functional grammar, 469–494. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Paradigmatic structure and reanalysis: from NPs to DPs in Scandinavian. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42(1). 11–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. Word order as grammaticalised semiotic systems. In L. Heltoft & al. (eds.), Perspectives on language structure and language change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen, 151–178. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herslund, M. 2001. The Danish s-genitive: From affix to clitic. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 33(1). 7–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. 1935–1937. La catégorie des cas 1–21. København: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
1970 [1939]. Notes sur les oppositions supprimables. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Copenhague 81. 51–57. Reprinted in his Essais linguistiques (Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Copenhague 12), 82–88. 2nd edn. Copenhague: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & E. C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, W. & M. Lehnert. 1954. Laut und Leben. Englische Lautgeschichte der neueren Zeit (1400–1950). 11. Bd. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Jensen, E. S. 2011. Nominativ i gammelskånsk. Afvikling og udviklinger med udgangspunkt i Skånske Lov i Stockholm B 69. Odense: Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund & Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
2012. Markedness, participation and grammatical paradigms: Jakobson and Hjelmslev revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 35(2). 145–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, T. 1967. Kasuslære 1. Innledning, nominativ, akkusativ. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
König, W. 2015. Dtv-Atlas Deutsche Sprache. 18th edn. München: Dtv.Google Scholar
Krause, W. 1968. Handbuch des Gotischen. 31. neubearb. Aufl. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Lockwood, W. B. 2002. An introduction to Modern Faroese. 4th edn. Tórshavn: Føroya Skúlabókagrunnur.Google Scholar
Mareš, František V. 1969 [1952]. Diachronische Phonologie des Ur- und Frühslavischen. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. 1922. Caractères généraux des langues germaniques. 2ième édn., revue, corrigée et augmentée. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Minkova, D. 1991. The history of final vowels in English: The sound of muting. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, P. J. 2010. Samstemmighed som syntagmedanner: Om begrebet kongruens. NyS – Nydanske Sprogstudier 381. 69–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, M. 2001. The loss of lexical case in Swedish. In J. T. Faarlund (ed.), Grammatical relations in change, 241–272. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Demarcating degrammaticalization. The Swedish s-genitive revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 29(2). 201–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nørgård-Sørensen, J. & L. Heltoft. 2015. Grammaticalisation as paradigmatisation. In A. D. M. Smith, G. Trousdale & R. Waltereit (eds.), New directions in grammaticalisation research, 261–292. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nørgård-Sørensen, J., L. Heltoft & L. Schøsler. 2011. Connecting grammaticalisation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petersen, K. T. 2018. Udviklingen af inkorporation fra gammeldansk til moderne dansk. Fra umarkerede kasusformer til markeret artikelløshed og enhedstryk. København: Universitets-Jubilæets Danske Samfund & Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
von Polenz, P. 2000. Deutsche Sprachgeschichte vom Spätmittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. Bd. 11. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringgaard, K. 1986. Flektionssystemets forenkling og middelnedertysk. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 1011. 173–183.Google Scholar
Roberge, P. 2010. Contact and the history of Germanic languages. In R. Hickey (ed.), Handbook of language contact, 406–431. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SdE = B. Ejder (ed.). 1983. Svenska medeltidspostillor, del 8. Lund: Svenska Fornskrift-sällskapet (after Cod. GKS 1390, 4o ).Google Scholar
Shrier, M. 1965. Case systems in German dialects. Language 41(3). 420–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SjT = N. Nielsen (red.). 1937. Sjælens Trøst. Universitets-Jubilæets Danske Samfund (after Cod. Holm. A 109 & Cod. Ups. C 529).Google Scholar
Skautrup, P. 1944. Det danske sprogs historie 1. Fra guldhornene til Jyske Lov. København: Gyldendal & Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar
SkL, E don. var. 136, 4o = Print of MS (Cod. E don. var. 136, 4o ).
SkL, Holm. B 74, 4o = J. Brøndum-Nielsen (ed.). 1961. Legem Scaniae e codice B 74 Bibl, Reg, Holm., et e codice coll. Reg, vestus, 3121, 4°, Bibl, Reg, Haun, phototypice expressam necon et Jus ecclesiasticum Scaniae ex iisdem codicibus eodem more redditum (Corpus Codicum Danicorum medii aevi 3). Hafniae: Ejnar Munksgaard (after Cod. Holm. B 74, 4o ).Google Scholar
Wessén, E. 1954. Om det tyska inflytandet på svenskt språk under medeltiden. Stockholm: Svenska bokförlaget.Google Scholar