Cover not available
Article published In:
NOWELE
Vol. 75:1 (2022) ► pp.42–80

The Burgundian language and its phylogeny

A cladistical investigation

ORCID logo | University of Konstanz
 | University of Konstanz
The Burgundian language is one of several smaller early Germanic languages that are scarcely attested and often under-researched. Moreover, it is commonly classified as an ‘East Germanic’ language, forming a Germanic subgroup alongside Northwest Germanic. This paper investigates Burgundian in detail in order to establish the most complete phonology and morphology that is currently possible with the current data base. Furthermore, we examine the linguistic relationships of Burgundian with other Germanic languages, with a focus on Gothic in particular. Our findings suggest that Burgundian does not form a coherent subgroup together with Gothic but that the data imply a common post-Proto-Germanic dialect continuum of which Burgundian, Gothic, and most likely Vandalic were a part.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The data
  • 3.Burgundian phonology
    • 3.1Burgundian phonological changes
      • 3.1.1Raising of */e/
      • 3.1.2Lowering of */u/
      • 3.1.3Vocalization of */j/
      • 3.1.4Vowels in unstressed positions
    • 3.2Apparent changes likely to be orthographic
      • 3.2.1Medial voicing
      • 3.2.2Deletion of */h/
      • 3.2.3Elision of */w/ before *u
      • 3.2.4Final devoicing
    • 3.3Burgundian phonology
      • 3.3.1The consonantal system
      • 3.3.2The vocalic system
  • 4.Burgundian morphology
    • 4.1Inflectional morphology
    • 4.2Compounding
  • 5.Aspects of Burgundian phylogeny
    • 5.1Burgundian and Northwest Germanic
    • 5.2Burgundian and Gothic
      • 5.2.1Vocalism
      • 5.2.2Consonantism
      • 5.2.3Morphology
    • 5.3Cladistical implications
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00062.har
References (43)
References
Allen, W. S. 1978. Vox Latina. A guide to the pronunciation of Classical Latin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bleiker, J. 1963. Das Burgunderproblem in germanistischer Sicht. Vox Romanica 221. 13–58.Google Scholar
Braune, W. & F. Heidermanns. 2004. Gotische Grammatik: Mit Lesestücken und Wörterverzeichnis. 20th edn. Vol. 11. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braune, W. & I. Reiffenstein. 2004. Althochdeutsche Grammatik. 15th edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L. 2013. Historical linguistics: An introduction. 3rd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, T. & C. Bowern. 2010. An introduction to historical linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
François, A. 2015. Trees, waves and linkages: Models of language diversification. In C. Bowern & B. Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 161–189. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Francovich Onesti, N. 2008. Ostrogothic and Burgundian personal names in comparison: A contrastive study. In A. Greule et al. (eds.), Studien zu Literatur, Sprache und Geschichte in Europa: Wolfgang Haubrichs zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet, 267–280. St. Ingbert: Röhrig Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Fulk, R. D. 2018. A comparative grammar of the early Germanic languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gamillscheg, E. 1936. Romania Germanica III: Die Burgunder. Berlin, Leipzig: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grimm, J. 1848. Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Hall, T. A. 2017. Underlying and derived glides in Middle High German. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. W. & E. M. Kaisse. 1999. Palatal vowels, glides and obstruents in Argentinian Spanish. Phonology 16(2). 117–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, F. 2020. The Vandalic language – Origins and relationships. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Haubrichs, W. 2008. Ein namhaftes Volk: Burgundische Namen und Sprache des 5. und 6. Jahrhunderts. In V. Gallé (ed.), Die Burgunder: Ethnogenese und Assimilation eines Volkes. Symposiumsband der Nibelungenlied-Gesellschaft Worms e. V. zum gleichnamigen Symposium vom 21. bis 24. September 2006, vol. 211, 135–184. Worms.Google Scholar
2014. Personennamen sprachlich ostgermanischer Provenienz. Studia an-throponymica scandinavica 321. 5–35.Google Scholar
2015. Burgundische und intergentile Rechtswörter des „Liber Constitutionum” (a. 517) im Kontext der Burgundenforschung. Sprachwissenschaft 40(2). 127–146.Google Scholar
Haubrichs, W. & M. Pfister. 2008. Burgundisch (Burgundian). In U. Ammon & H. Haarmann (eds.), Wieser Enzyklopädie. Sprachen des europäischen Westens, 73–80. Klagenfurt: Wieser Verlag.Google Scholar
Heather, P. 1996. The Goths. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2009. Empires and barbarians: The fall of Rome and the birth of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hempl, G. 1908. The linguistic and ethnografic status of the Burgundians. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 391. 105–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, R. 2014. Vowels before /r/ in the history of English. In S. E. Pfenninger et al. (eds.), Contact, variation and change in the history of English, 95–110. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, D. & B. D. Joseph. 2003. Reconsidering the canons of sound-change: Towards a “big bang” theory. In B. Black & K. Burridge (eds.), Historical linguistics 2001. Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13-17 August 2001, 205–219. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kögel, R. 1893. Anhang. Die stellung des burgundischen innerhalb der germanischen sprachen. Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum und deutsche Literatur 371. 223–231.Google Scholar
Kortlandt, F. 2001. The origin of the Goths. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 55(1). 21–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroonen, G. 2013. Etymological dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kuhn, H. 1955. Zur Gliederung der germanischen Sprachen. Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum und deutsche Literatur 86(1). 1–47.Google Scholar
Levin, J. 1985. A metrical theory of syllabicity. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Manczak, W. 1987. On the Ausgliederung of Germanic languages. Journal of Indo-European Studies 15(1–2). 1–17.Google Scholar
Mentz, A. 1954. Schrift und Sprache der Burgunder. Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum und deutsche Literatur 85(1). 1–17.Google Scholar
Miller, D. G. 2019. The Oxford Gothic grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedoma, R. 2010. Schrift und Sprache in den ostgermanischen Runeninschriften. NorthWestern European Language Evolution (NOWELE) 58/591. 1–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringe, D. A. 2017. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. 2nd edn. (A linguistic history of English, vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringe, D. A. & A. Taylor. 2014. The development of Old English. 1st edn. (A linguistic history of English, vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sen, R. 2012. Reconstructing phonological change: Duration and syllable structure in Latin vowel reduction. Phonology 29(3). 465–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stiles, P. V. 1995. Remarks on the “Anglo-Frisian” thesis. In V. F. Faltings, A. G. Walker & O. Wilts (eds.), Friesische Studien II 1, 177–220. Odense: Odense University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. The Pan-West Germanic isoglosses and the sub-relationships of West Germanic to other branches. North-Western European Language Evolution (NOWELE) 66(1). 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tischler, D. & R. Moosbrugger-Leu. 1982. Die Aufschriften auf burgundischen Danielschnallen: Mit Zeichnungen von R. Moosbrugger-Leu. Beiträge zur Namenforschung 17(2). 113–160.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, W. 1868. Sprache und Sprachdenkmäler der Burgunden. In K. Binding (ed.), Geschichte des burgundisch-romanischen Königreichs. Mit einer Beilage: Sprache und Sprachdenkmäler der Burgunden, von W. Wackernagel, vol. 11, 329–404. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Wiens, J. J. et al. 2008. Branch lengths, support, and congruence: testing the phyloge-nomic approach with 20 nuclear loci in snakes. Systematic Biology 57(3). 420–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, H. 2018. Das Römerreich und seine Germanen: Eine Erzählung von Herkunft und Ankunft. Cologne: Böhlau. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, I. 1990. Ethnicity and the ethnogenesis of the Burgundians. In H. Wolfram & W. Pohl (eds.), Typen der Ethnogenese unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Bayern, vol. 11, 53–69. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kim, Ronald I.
2024. On the Phylogenetic Status of East Germanic. In The Method Works, ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.